Hi Dan,
I want to focus on newer, and from-source, but until Friday I am only
working on
this from-binary. I want to add i686 today, and fix any bugs I may find.
I will perhaps also try add a bug-reporting mailing list to the PPA page,
it seems launchpad can host them. I may be back more often as
William Stein writes:
> Note that it is not obvious or documented how to effectively do this
> with the Sage library with other people, and still properly submit
> stuff for inclusion in Sage, but it should be possible.
>
> I setup something exactly like the above for trac #12545:
> http://tra
Jason Grout writes:
> On 2/28/12 7:04 PM, David Roe wrote:
>> Is there an easy way to collaborate on an experimental set of patches on
>> top of Sage? The sage-combinat model is very close to what I'm looking
>> for, but it seems difficult to set up all the infrastructure: we have to
>> have a se
Jason Grout writes:
> On 2/28/12 5:50 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> If we require a name in the reviewer field and designate that field as
>> "the person who should review the ticket," what will probably happen in
>> practice is that nobody will touch tickets with a non-empty reviewer
>> field, a
> See above. If the selected reviewer takes no action on a ticket after
> n days, then the ticket is changed back to "needs work" (and a message
> is sent) -- it is then the responsibility of the author of the ticket
> to choose an active reviewer.
>
Huh. In sum, this sounds like the whole idea
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 2/28/12 7:04 PM, David Roe wrote:
>>
>> Is there an easy way to collaborate on an experimental set of patches on
>> top of Sage? The sage-combinat model is very close to what I'm looking
>> for, but it seems difficult to set up all the infr
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:31 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Where is the field name "reviewer(s)" configured? I am going to change it
> to not have parens as soon as I can find it.
I've figured this out via grep.
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> On 2/28/12 5:16 PM, Wil
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:49 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> Some reasons for +1, in addition to Michael's (and I don't think that
> a git switch would help much with his reasons, unless everyone had
> access to the release manager's brain):
> * What about a first-time contributor to Sage of brand-new code
On Feb 27, 2:19 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:42 AM, William Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:31 AM, William Stein wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> Why is the default color for an ellipse (and circle) *black*, whereas
> >> the default color for (msot) everything else (
On Feb 28, 8:47 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Keshav Kini wrote:
> > Michael Orlitzky writes:
> >> On 02/28/2012 06:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
> >>> Incidentally, I think a ticket set to "needs review" that doesn't have
> >>> a specific *reviewer* chosen by the aut
Where is the field name "reviewer(s)" configured? I am going to change it
to not have parens as soon as I can find it.
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 2/28/12 5:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to make a query that lists all tickets that "needs revie
Also - Sage built fine with gcc 4.5.1 on my Linux installation (SuSE
11.4)
-drl
On Feb 28, 8:37 pm, deSitter wrote:
> Sun Enterprise 420R, gcc 4.6.2, Sun linker, LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/
> lib, Sun Studio 12 installed.
>
> There is a problem with inclusion of somewhere in the
> cvxopt-1.1.3
On 2/28/12 5:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to make a query that lists all tickets that "needs review",
but do not have anybody in the Reviewer field. I can't do this,
because the field is not "Reviewer" but "Reviewer(s)", and I can't
figure out how to use the query language of trac
On 2/28/12 5:50 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 02/28/2012 06:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
Incidentally, I think a ticket set to "needs review" that doesn't have
a specific *reviewer* chosen by the author of the ticket, should be
bumped back to "needs work". Perhaps the biggest reason we have 279
On 2/28/12 7:04 PM, David Roe wrote:
Is there an easy way to collaborate on an experimental set of patches on
top of Sage? The sage-combinat model is very close to what I'm looking
for, but it seems difficult to set up all the infrastructure: we have to
have a server analogous to http://sage.mat
On 02/28/2012 07:33 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
It's not much consolation right now, but this will become easier once we
switch to git, as branches can be automatically checked for whether they
are still mergeable into trunk or not. Well, the same could be done with
patches I guess but it would requi
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Michael Orlitzky writes:
>> On 02/28/2012 06:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> Incidentally, I think a ticket set to "needs review" that doesn't have
>>> a specific *reviewer* chosen by the author of the ticket, should be
>>> bumped back to "needs
On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 at 09:50PM +0100, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> The deb available below was not built from source on launchpad, instead
> it is the sage upstream binary built for Ubuntu 10.04.3 hammered into a
> PPA for lucid, maverick natty, oneiric, and precise in the ugliest possible
> way.
Three
Sun Enterprise 420R, gcc 4.6.2, Sun linker, LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/
lib, Sun Studio 12 installed.
There is a problem with inclusion of somewhere in the
cvxopt-1.1.3 package. Error:
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -g -O2 -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall -Wstrict-
prototypes -fPIC -I/root/Documents/sage
Is there an easy way to collaborate on an experimental set of patches on
top of Sage? The sage-combinat model is very close to what I'm looking
for, but it seems difficult to set up all the infrastructure: we have to
have a server analogous to http://sage.math.washington.edu:2144/, set up
the init
Michael Orlitzky writes:
> On 02/28/2012 06:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Incidentally, I think a ticket set to "needs review" that doesn't have
>> a specific *reviewer* chosen by the author of the ticket, should be
>> bumped back to "needs work". Perhaps the biggest reason we have 279
>> ticket
Dear All,
I just got my very first own server up and running, I installed debian
stable (squeeze 6.0.4) on it. And I saw that sage doesn't have a buildslave
for debian yet. I might want to make it available as a buildslave depending
on the answers of the following questions.
1. Will it be usef
On 02/28/2012 06:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
Incidentally, I think a ticket set to "needs review" that doesn't have
a specific *reviewer* chosen by the author of the ticket, should be
bumped back to "needs work". Perhaps the biggest reason we have 279
tickets (right now) that need review is tha
Hi,
I'm trying to make a query that lists all tickets that "needs review",
but do not have anybody in the Reviewer field. I can't do this,
because the field is not "Reviewer" but "Reviewer(s)", and I can't
figure out how to use the query language of trac (some sort of SQL) to
deal with a field na
On 02/28/2012 03:45 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
William Stein writes:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
It's not actually a fallback for b), though. If a file does exist with
the same name as a subcommand, b) makes it impossible to use that
subcommand without changing directory o
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012, Keshav Kini wrote:
> William Stein writes:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Keshav Kini
wrote:
>>> It's not actually a fallback for b), though. If a file does exist with
>>> the same name as a subcommand, b) makes it impossible to use that
>>> subcommand without
John H Palmieri writes:
> With the current setup, "foo.sage" needs to be preparsed into a Python file,
> and the way Sage knows to preparse it is to recognize its extension ".sage":
> see the script sage-run. I think if you do "sage foo", then it treats "foo" as
> a Python file. So I guess there i
On Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:45:08 PM UTC-8, Keshav Kini wrote:
>
> William Stein writes:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> >> It's not actually a fallback for b), though. If a file does exist with
> >> the same name as a subcommand, b) makes it impossible to use that
Hi
The deb available below was not built from source on launchpad, instead
it is the sage upstream binary built for Ubuntu 10.04.3 hammered into a
PPA for lucid, maverick natty, oneiric, and precise in the ugliest possible
way.
It is only 64bit at the moment.
To test it do this:
sudo apt-add-re
William Stein writes:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
>> It's not actually a fallback for b), though. If a file does exist with
>> the same name as a subcommand, b) makes it impossible to use that
>> subcommand without changing directory or deleting/moving the file. One
>> m
On Feb 28, 5:25 am, mhampton wrote:
> Scratch is great. Its been very successful for me in introducing my
> daughter to programming.
>
> I don't see much possible interaction with Sage, since Scratch is
> written in Squeak, and it has a custom (although quite permissive)
> license. It might pr
It's a bug in the eigenvalues() function in sage/matrix/matrix2.pyx.
It takes the chapr poly, factors it, and for any factor of degree > 1
it constructs the root-field and then finds all the Galois conjugates
of that in QQbar. The problem is that that gives all the conjugates
over QQ, not just the
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:43 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 23:54, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> On 02/27/12 15:51, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>> > 2) The standard solution has been brought up, and I think it is decent
>> > one; we use an escape mode with a double dash (e.g. sage --
>>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 23:54, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 02/27/12 15:51, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
> > 2) The standard solution has been brought up, and I think it is decent
> > one; we use an escape mode with a double dash (e.g. sage --
> > some_script.sage).
>
> This should probably be the fallb
On 02/27/12 15:51, R. Andrew Ohana wrote:
>
> 2) How would we handle sage scripts (or other things that are truly
> arguments and not subcommands)
> 2) The standard solution has been brought up, and I think it is decent
> one; we use an escape mode with a double dash (e.g. sage --
> some_script.s
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 14:59, Jan Groenewald wrote:
> xz-utils provides xz, and xz-lzma provides backwards compatible commands for
> lzma.
ok, so then if i don't forget, it will be .xz :-)
also, i just found out that fedora's rpm packages are xz compressed
now (similar for debs). good to know.
Hi
On 28 February 2012 14:50, Harald Schilly wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, February 27, 2012 3:40:50 PM UTC+1, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>>
>> Should sage prebuilt binaries move from lzma to xz?
>>
>
> When I started to do this, only lzma was installed as default on debian
> based and fedora systems. ins
On Monday, February 27, 2012 3:40:50 PM UTC+1, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Should sage prebuilt binaries move from lzma to xz?
>
When I started to do this, only lzma was installed as default on debian
based and fedora systems. installing xz would have removed lzma iirc. Is xz
now available on t
On Monday, February 27, 2012 2:25:58 AM UTC+1, rjf wrote:
>
>
> If Sage were to get
> GSOC approval to be a mentoring organization, would it
> match mentors and students to fix bugs in Maxima?
An hour ago I started a thread for project proposals. In this case I would
suggest that this needs
Hello!
Since the other GSOC thread got a bit hijacked, I'm starting a new
one. This one here is particularly only about project proposals and
possible mentors. There are still some viable proposals from last year
and I'll adopt them and contact the mentors directly, but it would be
great to get so
Scratch is great. Its been very successful for me in introducing my
daughter to programming.
I don't see much possible interaction with Sage, since Scratch is
written in Squeak, and it has a custom (although quite permissive)
license. It might provide some inspiration for making some sort of
vis
I also forwarded this to Maite Aranes who is a Catalan speaker who has
contributed to Sage.
John
On 28 February 2012 07:51, Georg S. Weber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> to my knowledge, Prof. Jordi Quer from Barcelona both speaks Catalan
> and knows Sage, so he might give valuable input. If the format/
> li
42 matches
Mail list logo
