[sage-devel] Re: A fork of Maxima aimed at embeddability

2012-01-04 Thread rjf
On Jan 4, 8:41 am, Juanjo wrote: > I think you do not get it: he is doing an effort for isolating Maxima > because the needs of his interface is multi-user. Currently, Maxima is very > ugly from this point of view: since it depends on many global variables, it > is difficult to isolate it as a l

[sage-devel] Re: A fork of Maxima aimed at embeddability

2012-01-04 Thread Juanjo
I think you do not get it: he is doing an effort for isolating Maxima because the needs of his interface is multi-user. Currently, Maxima is very ugly from this point of view: since it depends on many global variables, it is difficult to isolate it as a library that can be embedded in other pro

Re: [sage-devel] Question about the Notebook in the future Sage 5.0

2012-01-04 Thread Thierry Dumont
Le 04/01/2012 11:12, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > On 2012-01-04 10:43, Thierry Dumont wrote: >> 3 machines in the same network (linked with ethernet 1gb), sharing sage >> datas (user data) by nfs. > > In that case, you can simply solve your problem using the notebook() > server_pool option. No need

Re: [sage-devel] Integer Factorization: cunningham-tables-1.1 as a standard spkg

2012-01-04 Thread David Roe
Thanks to everyone for the input so far. I've changed the brent_tables spkg to use SQL, and updated the cunningham_tables spkg with some new factors. To get the latest versions, apply the following tickets: #12109, #12116, #12117, #7240, #12125, #12133, and install the following spkgs: * http://s

Re: [sage-devel] Question about the Notebook in the future Sage 5.0

2012-01-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-01-04 10:43, Thierry Dumont wrote: > 3 machines in the same network (linked with ethernet 1gb), sharing sage > datas (user data) by nfs. In that case, you can simply solve your problem using the notebook() server_pool option. No need to "distribute" users, everybody would log in to the sa

[sage-devel] Re: Executive decision needed

2012-01-04 Thread daveloeffler
On Jan 4, 5:26 am, William Stein wrote: > > I agree with you Michael,  though he expressed himself unclearly.   The > tickets was not about fixing doctests anywhere in sage (which your email > strongly suggested!) but about adding arbitrary checks to the doctest > framework. +1. If there are file

Re: [sage-devel] Question about the Notebook in the future Sage 5.0

2012-01-04 Thread Thierry Dumont
Le 04/01/2012 10:41, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > On 2012-01-04 10:37, Thierry Dumont wrote: >> I am currently running Sage on a server made of 3 independent machines, >> shared among the students of my University. > > You mean 3 different hardwares located in various parts of the network > or more

Re: [sage-devel] Question about the Notebook in the future Sage 5.0

2012-01-04 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2012-01-04 10:37, Thierry Dumont wrote: > I am currently running Sage on a server made of 3 independent machines, > shared among the students of my University. You mean 3 different hardwares located in various parts of the network or more like 3 equal machines within a fast local network? --

[sage-devel] Question about the Notebook in the future Sage 5.0

2012-01-04 Thread Thierry Dumont
Dear Sage developers, Some time ago, I could read that there was a project to store all user data in a data base, which could be independent of the computer on which Sage is running. Will this feature be included in 5.0? I am currently running Sage on a server made of 3 independent machines, shar