Right now, there are several parts of the Sage scripts having support
for doing things in parallel:
- Building Sage itself with SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD (which is now the
default)
- Source files in the same spkg
- Sage library (sage -b)
- Doctesting (sage -tp, make ptestlong)
- With #6495, building
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:59 PM, frosty wrote:
> > I have just discovered Sage & want to know if there are any folks here
> > working on making a Debian version that would work without having to
> > compile all the parts. i.e. use the needed files, apps & libraries
> > that are already packaged
On 2011-11-11 21:59, frosty wrote:
> Secondly I have downloaded the binary for Linux and have it installed
> & runnimng: I want to actually compile Sage for my server which is an
> AMD 6 core based server with 8Gb of ram running Debian stable. I
> tried , but it errored out, error 1 showing a segme
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:59 PM, frosty wrote:
> I have just discovered Sage & want to know if there are any folks here
> working on making a Debian version that would work without having to
> compile all the parts. i.e. use the needed files, apps & libraries
> that are already packaged in Debian
On Friday, November 11, 2011 2:45:08 PM UTC-8, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> I am considering removing the "doc" dependency from the test targets
> (like ptestlong). I am regularly annoyed by the long time it takes to
> rebuild the docs
>
>
> How about reviewing #6495 instead? It cuts down the time
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I am considering removing the "doc" dependency from the test targets
> (like ptestlong). I am regularly annoyed by the long time it takes to
> rebuild the docs when doing "make ptestlong". It is true that a few
> doctests would fail if no
I am considering removing the "doc" dependency from the test targets
(like ptestlong). I am regularly annoyed by the long time it takes to
rebuild the docs when doing "make ptestlong". It is true that a few
doctests would fail if no documentation has been built. But if the
documentation has been
Welcome to Sage!
There was an effort a couple years ago to get Sage as a debian
package. It was successful for a while, but then the maintainer left
academia and founded a startup, so it hasn't been upgraded.
I think one of the problems is getting a fairly current version of
Sage into Debian. I
Dear all,
I encountered some undesirable behavior when trying to contract an edge in a
bipartite graph:
sage: G = graphs.CompleteBipartiteGraph(3,3)
sage: G.merge_vertices([1,4])
Yields:
RuntimeError: Edge vertices must lie in different partitions.
sage: G.num_verts()
5
I'm ok with not being
I have just discovered Sage & want to know if there are any folks here
working on making a Debian version that would work without having to
compile all the parts. i.e. use the needed files, apps & libraries
that are already packaged in Debian.
Secondly I have downloaded the binary for Linux and hav
Is there a requirement that all Sage .py files should be ASCII or is
UTF8 also accepted?
It seems that Sphinx 1.1.2 (#10620) cares more about this: at #10112
there is a patch with a 0xd0 byte (which is neither ASCII neither UTF8)
which is rejected by Sphinx 1.1.2.
Jeroen.
--
To post to this gro
Le 08/11/2011 17:04, Michael Orlitzky a écrit :
In any case, the "do them both" approach is fine until one is so
obviously superior that the other side can be convinced.
Just to make my position clear again ; I'm for the "do them both"
approach. And I don't call for breaking anything at once,
For the record, I found a way that works for me quite well now:
udict = {}
cdict = {}
docdict = {}
def var2(name,doc='',units='',domain1='real',latexname='',value =
-1234):
'''
Creates a symbolic variable in the given domain (standard:'real')
and with the given
latexname. Further, it
Have to put my vote in for the virtual image. Except for R graphics (which
I have issues with on Linux :P), it does everything I want to do. Volker
Braun does awesome work.
Joal Heagney
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
On 10 Nov., 13:33, Maarten Derickx
wrote:
> I like your ideas about guest distributions Georg.
>
Thanks!
> The missing thing you describe: "a way to tell the host distrubution on
> what packages we depend" is not really the missing thing. I think a way to
> make sage configurable to use other
15 matches
Mail list logo
