On 2 Sep., 09:52, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 at 12:28AM -0700, leif wrote:
> > The problem with Singular is the order of '-ldl' and '-lkernel'; the
> > latter uses the former, so the order has to be flipped. Haven't yet
> > checked whether this is already fixed in a *current* upstream
On 2 Sep., 22:00, jlh wrote:
> > > An ugly work-around is to set LDFLAGS='ldl'
>
> > I can confirm that by using the LDFLAGS workaround and fiddling with the
> > Symmetrica makefile, both spkgs compile, and the resulting Sage build
> > passes all tests on my Oneiric VM.
>
> > Dan
>
> My Singular (
> > An ugly work-around is to set LDFLAGS='ldl'
>
> I can confirm that by using the LDFLAGS workaround and fiddling with the
> Symmetrica makefile, both spkgs compile, and the resulting Sage build
> passes all tests on my Oneiric VM.
>
> Dan
My Singular (both the standalone and in Sage) still
b
Those might be relevant:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4446
http://www.sagemath.org/packages/optional/mpc-0.8.3-dev-svn793.txt
Regards,
Yann
On Sep 1, 11:02 am, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> During the coding sprints taking place at ECC2011 summer school, one
> of our p
On 9/2/11 2:47 AM, Maarten Derickx wrote:
Is there any one actually using this field for searching and really want
to keep that functionallity?
The use I've had for it was a reminder that I needed to report something
upstream. For example, I'd find a bug in an upstream package, put it on
tr
> So here my question to sage-dev: Is there any one actually using this field
> for searching and really want to keep that functionallity?
I don't use it for searching but find having a finite number of
options really saves time; otherwise I might take forever trying to
come up with the right nua
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 at 12:28AM -0700, leif wrote:
> For symmetrica, '-lm' has to be moved, but there's actually already a
> new spkg which removes the test executable completely, and thereby
> also the (need for the) '-lm'; see .
>
> The problem with Singular is the order of '-ldl' and '-lkernel';
Dear Leif,
thank you for the amazing and trivial suggestion
>> Adding your directory where m1.py and m2.py live to SAGE_PATH and
>> running (e.g.)
This link is related:
http://ask.sagemath.org/question/415/how-do-i-get-sage-to-honor-my-pythonpath
So this info could be in Sage Developers manual
On Friday, September 2, 2011 8:31:29 AM UTC+2, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> why don't we just have a text entry there,
That sounds like a really easy and elegant solution. I wonder how many
people use the upstream for searching tickets, since I guess thats the only
functionality that gets less
It seems that Julian Rüth found the cause of the problem, so no help needed
anymore :).
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://gr
Maarten and I discussed this issue in a chat yesterday and it seems
that we've found the source of the problem (described in the ticket).
I'm working on a fix now.
julian
* Maarten Derickx [2011-08-31 19:58:52 -0700]:
> At http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11751 I try to fix some problem
On 2 Sep., 08:31, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> why don't we just have a text entry there, and not that silly list of
> choices...
> Imagine , then one can do something like "Upstream threatens us with a legal
> action", or
> "Upstream reported the case to the Russian Mafia"...
> "Got beaten up by a g
12 matches
Mail list logo
