Hi Evans
On 21 August 2011 05:11, leif wrote:
> Looks like you have CPU throttling (a.k.a. power-save mode) enabled.
>
http://askubuntu.com/questions/30334/list-of-application-indicators/37997#37997
sudo apt-add-repository ppa:artfwo/ppa
sudo aptitude update
sudo aptitude -y install indicator
Hi
On 21 August 2011 00:56, Andrew Fleckenstein
wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 22:41 +, Evans Doe Ocansey wrote:
> > Dear all,
> > I was installing SAGE on an acer laptop on ubuntu 11.04 platform and
> > got the this error after the installation. To see the error, I click
> > on the link to d
On 12 Aug., 02:48, leif wrote:
> On 12 Aug., 02:15, leif wrote:
>
> > On 11 Aug., 23:21, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> > > I built a Sage binary distribution on redhawk with atlas-3.8.4.spkg and
> > > SAGE_FAT_BINARY=yes. It is at:
>
> > >http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/vbraun/Sage/sage-4.7.1.rc
> > Is this the thread?
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/70eb8b...
>
> Much
> older:http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/4986/import-audi...
I never saw this reply until Leif resurrected this thread. Is that
patch still workable? That is, sho
On 21 Aug., 00:41, Evans Doe Ocansey wrote:
> Dear all,
> I was installing SAGE on an acer laptop on ubuntu 11.04 platform and
> got the this error after the installation. To see the error, I click
> on the link to download the install.log file.
>
> http://users.aims.ac.za/~evans/sage-bugs/install
No, I haven't. And I'm off to sleep now since I have to catch an early
flight tomorrow ;-)
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http:
On 19 Aug., 23:18, Ivo Hedtke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have problems with it.
>
> I click on "Login" and use my username and password from trac. That works.
>
> But if I click on a link, say "Settings", I am not logged in anymore: "You
> must login to use this action: userprefs."
Now works for me (lo
On 6 Aug., 18:32, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 2:21 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
> > When I tried to remove the --disable-function-redefinition, I got lots of
> > failures from the Sage library. This is not unexpected, as the release notes
> > state. I tried to clean up some of the ci
On Sat, 2011-08-20 at 22:41 +, Evans Doe Ocansey wrote:
> Dear all,
> I was installing SAGE on an acer laptop on ubuntu 11.04 platform and
> got the this error after the installation. To see the error, I click
> on the link to download the install.log file.
>
> http://users.aims.ac.za/~evans/s
Dear all,
I was installing SAGE on an acer laptop on ubuntu 11.04 platform and
got the this error after the installation. To see the error, I click
on the link to download the install.log file.
http://users.aims.ac.za/~evans/sage-bugs/install.log.tar.gz
The following links gives some information
Also Rob, the real name for the field is M._NumberField_relative__gens
(or similar).
John
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 8:32 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>> Thanks for the sleuthing and ideas, John. Yes, I should have used a
>> monic polynomial in my
> [X] yes include it as standard
> [] yes but have it as optional SPKG first
> [] I don't care
> [] no don't include
Best,
Alex
--
Alex Ghitza -- Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne
-- http://aghitza.org
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
T
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
>> So:
>> [X] yes include it as standard
agreed, +1
>> [] yes but have it as optional SPKG first
>> [] I don't care
>> [] no don't include
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this
> So:
> [X] yes include it as standard
> [] yes but have it as optional SPKG first
> [] I don't care
> [] no don't include
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more opt
+1 from me for standard package.
H
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sage
[X] yes include it as standard
[ ] yes but have it as optional SPKG first
[ ] I don't care
[ ] no don't include
I agree in principle, though I haven't reviewed any of the spkg.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
One more thing: let's just have a formal vote now and not bent the rules. If
there's sufficient interest in this then it will survive an additional vote.
Here's the description again:
M4RIE is a library for dense linear algebra over GF(2^e). It is heavily based
on M4RI and is written by me. It
On Saturday 20 August 2011, Simon King wrote:
> Hi William, hi Martin,
>
> On 20 Aug., 21:56, William Stein wrote:
> > My impression is that this is *not* a totally new spkg, but simply
> > some additional code of a similar nature being included in an existing
> > spkg.If so, no formal vote i
Hi William, hi Martin,
On 20 Aug., 21:56, William Stein wrote:
> My impression is that this is *not* a totally new spkg, but simply
> some additional code of a similar nature being included in an existing
> spkg. If so, no formal vote is required for this, just positive
> review of the ticket
Hi,
In case there is confusion, my understanding is that the *flask*
version of the notebook doesn't use twisted web 2 at all. The whole
point of the flask rewrite was to get rid of the dependence on
twisted. However, so that we could run the flask notebook without
having to setup Apache as dep
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 06:48:02 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> A couple of days ago we had a hard to explain crash of sagenb (flask)
> webapp when it was hammered by 70 undergrads simultaneously during our lab.
> We don't rule out that it could be a twisted bug. Twisted has meanwhile
> advanced to version 1
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
>> And I hope you don't mind that I asked here: I thought that the wish
>> to add it as a standard package was implicit in your opening the
>> ticket.
>
> I don't understand the question. Yep, I wanted it to become standard when I
> opened i
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Thanks for the sleuthing and ideas, John. Yes, I should have used a
> monic polynomial in my example since the original problem I have is
> with factors of a characteristic polynomial (and get similar
> behavior).
>
> I also get
>
> sage: M._g
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I find the preparser perilous. It does some great things, such as the
> "F. =" syntax. But every addition seems to come with a high cost.
> The *.sage/*.py dichotomy is confusing for new folks who want to write
> scripts immediately. And the
I find the preparser perilous. It does some great things, such as the
"F. =" syntax. But every addition seems to come with a high cost.
The *.sage/*.py dichotomy is confusing for new folks who want to write
scripts immediately. And then there is the whole Integer() quagmire.
On the flip side, I
On Aug 20, 7:11 am, Chris Godsil wrote:
> And if P is a graph then P.am().charpoly()
> works but P.charpoly() does not
> (but both A.characteristic_polynomial() and
> P.characteristic_polynomial() do).
Patch to enable P.charpoly() ready for review at:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1
Thanks for the sleuthing and ideas, John. Yes, I should have used a
monic polynomial in my example since the original problem I have is
with factors of a characteristic polynomial (and get similar
behavior).
I also get
sage: M._gens is None
True
The eigenspace code (and probably eigenvalues, to
> And I hope you don't mind that I asked here: I thought that the wish
> to add it as a standard package was implicit in your opening the
> ticket.
I don't understand the question. Yep, I wanted it to become standard when I
opened it and I still would like that to happen.
Cheers,
Martin
--
nam
Hi Martin,
On 20 Aug., 19:36, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> we did have some sort of vote before
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/1794b8985d788004/
>
> which left me with the impression that it was accepted.
I was not aware of that thread (I think you didn't mention
> IIRC, adding a standard spkg also requires someone in charge of its
> maintenance for at least two years; maybe ask Martin...? ;-)
This is new to me but it makes sense. Of course, I will look after maintaining
this library's SPKG.
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.e
On Saturday 20 August 2011, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Martin Albrecht had opened #9562 and proposed to use M4RIE as default
> for matrices over GF(2^e). If I understand correctly, the package
> builds fine on all supported platforms (including Cygwin).
>
> The ticket is almost getting a positiv
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 5:36 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I'm trying to compute some eigenspaces for matrices over number
> fields, mostly because I can, in order to build some doctests.
> Eigenspace routine uses the root_field() method on an irreducible
> factor of a characteristic polynomial to creat
On 20 Aug., 16:34, Simon King wrote:
> Martin Albrecht had opened #9562 and proposed to use M4RIE as default
> for matrices over GF(2^e). If I understand correctly, the package
> builds fine on all supported platforms (including Cygwin).
>
> The ticket is almost getting a positive review from me,
I am all for it, but shouldn't it become an optional package first?
Dima
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.c
PS:
I forgot to ask another question. Provided that we decide to make it a
standard package: Should the new module for matrices over GF(2^e) be
included in the reference manual?
Without any exception, all methods are either cdef resp. underscore
(hence, will not be in the reference manual anywa
On 8/20/11 10:07 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
I completely agree with you! Also, just adding this parsing of
matrix-strings doesn't change anything in terms of
adoption-friendliness. It might be nice for playing around or solving
some educational examples, but it's irrelevant for the average matlab
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 16:11, Chris Godsil wrote:
> The point being that consistency is more important than the details of
> syntax,
> in part because it makes the syntax easier to learn and to remember.
I completely agree with you! Also, just adding this parsing of
matrix-strings doesn't change
Hi!
Martin Albrecht had opened #9562 and proposed to use M4RIE as default
for matrices over GF(2^e). If I understand correctly, the package
builds fine on all supported platforms (including Cygwin).
The ticket is almost getting a positive review from me, modulo some
minor issues with documentatio
Simon
You raise a number of very good points. In my case, my matrices are
produced by some other routine or
will be read in from a file. When I do type in small matrices, I've
never found the syntax to be
a problem. The sort of thing that has annoyed me is that matrix() and
Matrix() both work, but
A couple of days ago we had a hard to explain crash of sagenb (flask)
webapp when it was hammered by 70 undergrads simultaneously during our lab.
We don't rule out that it could be a twisted bug. Twisted has meanwhile
advanced to version 11.0.0, and no longer includes twisted.web2.
The latter w
40 matches
Mail list logo
