Hi Leif,
On 17 Aug., 02:14, leif wrote:
> Well, you'd see that message if you were using some HTTP proxy as
> well.
>
> So looks like Mercurial is caching it. Perhaps also try the '-f'
> option,
Thank you, I didn't know about a -f option.
However, since wget isn't getting it either, I think it
I have not used matlab a lot, and not for some time, but I have
colleagues in
numerical optimization who use it heavily. I think there is
essentially no chance
that such people would move from matlab to sage. The only complaints I
have heard are
occasional mutterings about licensing. Matlab has ver
On 16 Aug., 22:41, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> On 16 Aug., 22:22, Volker Braun wrote:
>
> > But really it sounds like you are behind a transparent
> > http cache thats broken. You might want to ask your system admin...
>
> I just remember another detail that supports your conjecture: Usual
I'm cross-posting this to the Octave maintainers' mailing list in case
other maintainers also want to comment on it or correct anything I say
here.
On 15 August 2011 14:58, William Stein wrote:
> If somebody walked up to *you* and asked: "Is Sage now a viable
> alternative to MATLAB?" what would
> > If the owner forgot about the ticket (holidays and stuff), I think it
> > is perfectly fine if the author him- or herself asks on one of the
> > sage lists (probably sage-devel is a good choice, or a specialised
> > list if that exists for the given topic).
I think that "owner" is little more
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Volker,
>
> On 16 Aug., 22:22, Volker Braun wrote:
>> wget will by default not clobber the file with a newer version, and instead
>> save it as m4rie_for_sage.patch.1
>
> OK, but it was on a different directory, thus, no clobbering
> intende
Hi Volker,
On 16 Aug., 22:22, Volker Braun wrote:
> But really it sounds like you are behind a transparent
> http cache thats broken. You might want to ask your system admin...
I just remember another detail that supports your conjecture: Usually,
when I import a patch from trac then a message s
Hi Volker,
On 16 Aug., 22:22, Volker Braun wrote:
> wget will by default not clobber the file with a newer version, and instead
> save it as m4rie_for_sage.patch.1
OK, but it was on a different directory, thus, no clobbering
intended...
> Which mercurial version are you using?
The example ab
Hi Kresimir, hi all,
On 16 Aug., 21:49, Kresimir Kumericki wrote:
> ... I use sage for fast prototyping of a new project, but
> when stuff gets serious I export everything to python-numpy-vim because
> jumping around huge worksheet is just too awkward and slows me down.
My impression of the sage
wget will by default not clobber the file with a newer version, and instead
save it as m4rie_for_sage.patch.1
Things work for me:
[vbraun@volker-laptop-two ~]$ cd /tmp
[vbraun@volker-laptop-two tmp]$ mkdir test
[vbraun@volker-laptop-two tmp]$ cd test
[vbraun@volker-laptop-two test]$ hg init
[
Hi Simon,
Am 16.08.2011 um 22:01 schrieb Simon King:
> Hence, the patch that got downloaded does not contain the string
> "lmul". The same happens if you download it using wget.
>
> Now, visit
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/9562/m4rie_for_sage.patch
> and you will find t
Hi!
Here is a concrete example, that should suffice to demonstrate that I
did not mess up my own patch queue, and that it is really a problem of
trac (or of wget):
king@mpc622:~$ mkdir test
king@mpc622:~$ cd test
king@mpc622:~/test$ hg init
king@mpc622:~/test$ hg qinit
king@mpc622:~/test$ hg qimp
On Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:41:36 PM UTC+2, Pedro Cruz wrote:
> Sagenotebook has the advantage of shareable over the net worksheets but
> the editing 83 functions on it became hardwork because of those jumps on
> screen
>
> This is exactly my feeling. In my case (I do both symbolical and num
Yes and no. I know a largish community, people working on interior point
methods for nonlinear optimization, where it is rather hard to get around
without Matlab. Partly this is due to relative easiness of creating Matlab
interfaces to C and Fortran code, which makes experimenting easier
Ma
On 8/16/11 1:28 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi Sage Users,
The entire sagemath cluster will be off from 4am until 10am PST on
September 9, because the server room in the Univ of Washington
mathematics department is having major electrical repair work done,
and will have no power.
This means of cou
Hi Sage Users,
The entire sagemath cluster will be off from 4am until 10am PST on
September 9, because the server room in the Univ of Washington
mathematics department is having major electrical repair work done,
and will have no power.
This means of course that you can't just ssh to
sage.math.wa
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Rolf,
>
> first of all, I am sorry that I can not review it, myself, since
> probability distributions are very far from my own field.
>
> More experienced developers may correct me, but I thought that one of
> the responsibilities of the own
Thanks for the useful comments. I'll try to make it to the interfaces
session tomorrow.
John
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:16 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 16, 7:39 am, John Cremona wrote:
>> I have just noticed that there's an international R users conference,
>> with over 400 participants, t
Hi Rolf,
first of all, I am sorry that I can not review it, myself, since
probability distributions are very far from my own field.
More experienced developers may correct me, but I thought that one of
the responsibilities of the owner of a ticket is to approach potential
reviewers, if it is appa
Hi!
Today, I observed a problem that has never occurred to me before.
I am currently working on reviewing #9562 and #11685. In both cases,
the author replaced a patch with an updated version.
What I did next was
hg qpop
hg qdelete `name of the patch`
hg qimport http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_tr
Sorry,
my mistake. It's here http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11572
I even added some notebooks to test the new capabilities.
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/2887
http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/2886
Waiting for further suggestions.
Best
On 16 Aug., 16:37, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Rolf,
>
Hi Rolf,
On 16 Aug., 13:56, Rolf wrote:
> Hello,
> some weeks ago I uploaded a patch adding new probability
> distributions. I even made the recommended changes immediatly. Nothing
> happend ever since. Did I miss something?
Where did you upload it? I.e., what trac ticket is it?
Best regards,
S
On 8/16/11 2:44 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
I have to be careful, because I would not claim to be a numerical
linear algebraist, so I am willing to be corrected - but I think an LU
decomposition would be the first choice for an alternative to rref.
It is basically what we used to call Gaussian elimina
On 8/16/11 1:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Aug 15, 12:58 pm, William Stein wrote:
If somebody walked up to *you* and asked: "Is Sage now a viable
alternative to MATLAB?" what would you say?
Good question.
If you consider "matrix algebra"
On Aug 16, 7:39 am, John Cremona wrote:
> I have just noticed that there's an international R users conference,
> with over 400 participants, taking place right now in my building
> (which houses both Mathematics and Statistics departments).
> Seehttp://www.warwick.ac.uk/statsdept/useR-2011/
Hello,
some weeks ago I uploaded a patch adding new probability
distributions. I even made the recommended changes immediatly. Nothing
happend ever since. Did I miss something?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
I have just noticed that there's an international R users conference,
with over 400 participants, taking place right now in my building
(which houses both Mathematics and Statistics departments). See
http://www.warwick.ac.uk/statsdept/useR-2011/
Any suggestions? Any readers of this list at the
Dear Sage project leader,
My experience is about Sage 4.6.2:
For numerical computations I have quieted of Sage/Sagenotebook and use only
scipy/numpy directly using vim and shell.
Sagenotebook has the advantage of shareable over the net worksheets but the
editing 83 functions on it became har
Hi Jeroen,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> I have "completed" milestone sage-4.7.1 on Trac but now all existing
> tickets still refer to sage-4.7.1, this should be changed to sage-4.7.2.
I just bumped all (or at least I think I have done so) tickets to
milestone 4.7.2. P
I have "completed" milestone sage-4.7.1 on Trac but now all existing
tickets still refer to sage-4.7.1, this should be changed to sage-4.7.2.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroup
MIT's online linear algebra course with Gilbert Strang
mentions rref as one of the very first functions in Matlab.
On Tue, 2011-08-16 at 00:44 -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
> On Aug 15, 11:38 pm, William Stein wrote:
> > It sound like it wouldn't be difficult for you to name one single
> > Matlab matr
On Aug 15, 11:38 pm, William Stein wrote:
> It sound like it wouldn't be difficult for you to name one single
> Matlab matrix function that engineers would actually use that
> Numpy/Scipy doesn't have? I wonder why it's not in numpy yet.
Sorry, I couldn't parse that. Did you mean "would" in
32 matches
Mail list logo
