> > If the owner forgot about the ticket (holidays and stuff), I think it > > is perfectly fine if the author him- or herself asks on one of the > > sage lists (probably sage-devel is a good choice, or a specialised > > list if that exists for the given topic).
I think that "owner" is little more than a random name of someone who has asked to receive notifications about this type of ticket. In the case of this ticket, there were some disagreements as well about how to structure things in this module. > > Perhaps I am glorifying the past, but it seems to me that the > > development process used to be "snappier" a few years ago. > > This might be partly my fault since I purposely have been working (a > lot) less directly on Sage during the last 2 years. I had to take a > break to avoid burnout, and get momentum back on some of my other > important work (e.g., research papers). I don't think you should blame yourself. I think there is a lot more ownership of Sage by people other than William Stein now, which is very positive. However, that said, having his energy is very helpful :) There's also the issue of people not having as much time to review as before? We definitely need more reviewers in the mix. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
