Minor correction - 0.12 was released on 2010-06-13; 0.12.2 was released on
2011-01-31 (see http://trac.edgewall.org/browser/tags ).
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, sen
On 13 Aug., 03:34, leif wrote:
> On 13 Aug., 00:24, Jason B Hill wrote:
>
> > It actually doesn't appear to give an error then. Under both root and
> > sageserver users in the chroot, I get the
>
> > ... stuff + gap version + stuff ... 62+@&67542+@ngap>
>
> > prompt.
>
> How about /dev/pts ?
>
>
On 13 Aug., 00:24, Jason B Hill wrote:
> It actually doesn't appear to give an error then. Under both root and
> sageserver users in the chroot, I get the
>
> ... stuff + gap version + stuff ... 62+@&67542+@ngap>
>
> prompt.
How about /dev/pts ?
(/opt/sage/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sage/
On 13 Aug., 00:09, Keshav Kini wrote:
> Full release notes are
> here:http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/ReleaseNotes/0.12
(Brief excerpt, personal highlights:)
- *Editable* comments!1!!111! Yeah! (Wonder whether or when they'll
support concurrent posting... :P )
- Wiki pages can now be ren
Hi David,
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:35 AM, davidp wrote:
> I think it should be easier to find the Thematic Tutorials (http://
> sagemath.org/doc/thematic_tutorials/). I only learned about these
> tutorials by accident using Google.
>
> In fact, now that I look more closely at the Documentation
It actually doesn't appear to give an error then. Under both root and
sageserver users in the chroot, I get the
... stuff + gap version + stuff ... 62+@&67542+@ngap>
prompt.
> What if you do "sage -sh" and try to run "gap -r -b -p -T -o G
> /opt/sage/data//extcode/gap/sage.g" manually? What
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Jason B Hill wrote:
> RuntimeError: Unable to start gap because the command 'gap -r -b -p -T
> -o G /opt/sage/data//extcode/gap/sage.g' failed.
What if you do "sage -sh" and try to run "gap -r -b -p -T -o G
/opt/sage/data//extcode/gap/sage.g" manually? Wh
Leif: good point, though I imagine you know more about that than me :) Full
release notes are here:
http://trac.edgewall.org/wiki/TracDev/ReleaseNotes/0.12
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubs
I'm wondering if anyone has any pointers on an error I'm getting.
In a schroot+debootstrap environment using Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64, I can
extract and run the binary of Sage 4.7 as root. I can also extract,
build, and run sage from source as root. Both of these fail in the
same way when I chown a bui
I have communicated specific suggestions to the webmaster. I guess
that's the appropriate way of dealing with this.
On Aug 12, 11:36 am, davidp wrote:
> A "ticket", that is (not "trac").
>
> On Aug 12, 11:35 am, davidp wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I think it should be easier to find the Thematic Tu
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:54 AM, wrote:
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
> kcrisman wrote:
>
>>
>> Sorry, I misunderstood exactly what the problem was - though until
>> 4.7.1 comes out, the tutorial won't be "public". Anyway, this
>> explains why it's not available yet.
>
Hello!
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 10:53:12 -0700 (PDT)
kcrisman wrote:
>
> Sorry, I misunderstood exactly what the problem was - though until
> 4.7.1 comes out, the tutorial won't be "public". Anyway, this
> explains why it's not available yet.
>
That clears the situation. I was a bit worried be
The biggest change I remember was that they now support multiple
repositories, which might be interesting since we have multiple repositories
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegrou
A "ticket", that is (not "trac").
On Aug 12, 11:35 am, davidp wrote:
> I think it should be easier to find the Thematic Tutorials (http://
> sagemath.org/doc/thematic_tutorials/). I only learned about these
> tutorials by accident using Google.
>
> In fact, now that I look more closely at the Do
I think it should be easier to find the Thematic Tutorials (http://
sagemath.org/doc/thematic_tutorials/). I only learned about these
tutorials by accident using Google.
In fact, now that I look more closely at the Documentation page,
http://sagemath.org/help.html#SageStandardDoc, I see there is
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Julian Rüth wrote:
> I'm not sure if this discussion has been picked up in a different thread
> since February but the problem with zipimport seems to be that it can't load
> .so files. Since we have plenty of them, just loading the .py files from a
> zip file and
I'm not sure if this discussion has been picked up in a different thread
since February but the problem with zipimport seems to be that it can't load
.so files. Since we have plenty of them, just loading the .py files from a
zip file and the .so files from the file system might not be such a big
> > > So how can one access the Russian Tutorial on sagemath.org?
>
> This was already merged!
>
Sorry, I misunderstood exactly what the problem was - though until
4.7.1 comes out, the tutorial won't be "public". Anyway, this
explains why it's not available yet.
> > > And by the way, why isht
On Aug 12, 1:16 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:03 AM, wrote:
> > Hello!
> > I tried to access the Sage Tutorial in Russain today and went to the
> >http://sagemath.org/ru/page for this purpose. There is a link
> > "Documentation" on it which gives the following message:
On 12 Aug., 18:50, leif wrote:
>
> env MAKE="make -n" SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BUILD=yes make build | sed -n -e
> 's/.*} //' -e 's/ 2>&1.*//p'
>
> which just prints the names of the spkgs that would get rebuilt /
> reinstalled.
Missed one superfluous line, use:
env MAKE="make -n" SAGE_PARALLEL_SPKG_BU
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 5:03 AM, wrote:
> Hello!
> I tried to access the Sage Tutorial in Russain today and went to the
> http://sagemath.org/ru/ page for this purpose. There is a link
> "Documentation" on it which gives the following message:
>
> "Forbidden
> You don't have permission to
On 12 Aug., 14:51, Rita Morgan wrote:
> I have a spkg I would like to recompile with different parameters,
> what is the recommended way of doing it?
Depends on what parameters you want to change. You can usually set CC,
CFLAGS etc., and some packages recognize additional environment
variables to
On 12 Aug., 13:00, Keshav Kini wrote:
> What do you all think about upgrading our Trac server? We're currently on
> Trac version 0.11.5, which is more than two years old. The entire 0.11.x
> series (which went up to 0.11.7) is now deprecated. The latest version is
> 0.12.2.
Can you advertise some
On 12 Aug., 12:02, Harald Schilly wrote:
> FWIW, i just did a du -sch * on a recently built 4.7.1-rc2. The total is
> just 2.5G and the filesystem is ext3. devel: 1.1G, local: 1G.
Which might change over time... ;-)
> I have an additional idea. If you have a recent linux kernel and want to
> sa
On Friday, August 12, 2011 9:27:59 AM UTC-4, François wrote:
>
> \I think that's the only way that has a chance of working with a stock sage
> and
> sage's spkgs.
If a simple rename of the libraries doesn't work one could build a stub
library that translates the usual blas/lapack into intel MK
On 8/12/11 8:58 AM, kcrisman wrote:
See alsohttp://www.geogebra.org/trac/wiki/Gsoc2011 for some of the
long-range thinking - very interesting list of projects!
That page lists Wolfram Alpha as a possible CAS backend. Perhaps the
new Sage single-cell server would also be a good option!
Jaso
On 8/12/11 8:57 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
Jason wrote:
People might interested in knowing that GeoGebra 4.0 uses the Java
version of Reduce (http://reduce-algebra.sourceforge.net/) as its main
CAS.
The GeoGebra developers are also working on a JavaScript version of
GeoGebra and a JavaScript version
On Aug 12, 9:29 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 8/12/11 8:14 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > kcrisman wrote:
>
> >> I was as mentioning Geogebra to a student today, and decided to see
> >> what's up.
>
> >> In brief, a lot! So this is an FYI to the Sage community.
>
> > People might interested in
Jason wrote:
>> People might interested in knowing that GeoGebra 4.0 uses the Java
>> version of Reduce (http://reduce-algebra.sourceforge.net/) as its main
>> CAS.
>>
>> The GeoGebra developers are also working on a JavaScript version of
>> GeoGebra and a JavaScript version of Reduce has been cre
Hi,
I just uploaded a few patches to sage-trac:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3317
The design of this "new" citation system is - in short - the
following:
- "citable_items" holds citation information
- "@cite" is the decorator to mark functions to be using a citable
item
- Collected
I think you may need to do `sage -f newspkg`, for one thing, to get the
modified spkg itself to get rebuilt/installed. As for dependencies, I am not
aware of any dependency-tracking mechanism for SPKGs - am I missing
something? If what you're installing is using Python's distutils to install
a
On 8/12/11 8:14 AM, Ted Kosan wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
I was as mentioning Geogebra to a student today, and decided to see
what's up.
In brief, a lot! So this is an FYI to the Sage community.
People might interested in knowing that GeoGebra 4.0 uses the Java
version of Reduce (http://reduce-al
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:05:22 Volker Braun wrote:
> Looks like intel uses a completely different naming scheme instead
> of liblapack.so / libcblas.so / libf77blas.so. Francois' suggestion of
> renaming the intel MKL libraries to something standard is a good one, though
> it might not work. Since in
kcrisman wrote:
>I was as mentioning Geogebra to a student today, and decided to see
> what's up.
>
> In brief, a lot! So this is an FYI to the Sage community.
People might interested in knowing that GeoGebra 4.0 uses the Java
version of Reduce (http://reduce-algebra.sourceforge.net/) as its mai
Looks like intel uses a completely different naming scheme instead
of liblapack.so / libcblas.so / libf77blas.so. Francois' suggestion of
renaming the intel MKL libraries to something standard is a good one, though
it might not work. Since intel already went through the trouble of renaming
all
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 05:45:43 Rita Morgan wrote:
> I would like to compile sage so it can see our Intel MKL BLAS.
>
> During compilation has anyone successfully linked Intelś MKL with
> Sage?
>
> Here is how I would link
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-math-kernel-library-intel-mk
I have a spkg I would like to recompile with different parameters,
what is the recommended way of doing it?
I usually do this:
* untar the spkg
* make my changes
* recreate the spkg
* sage -i newspkg
Will this rebuild my dependencies because that would be the desired
behavior.
--
To post to thi
I would like to compile sage so it can see our Intel MKL BLAS.
During compilation has anyone successfully linked Intelś MKL with
Sage?
Here is how I would link
http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-math-kernel-library-intel-mkl-for-linux-linking-applications-with-intel-mkl-version-100/
Hello!
I tried to access the Sage Tutorial in Russain today and went to the
http://sagemath.org/ru/ page for this purpose. There is a link
"Documentation" on it which gives the following message:
"Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /ru/html/ on this server."
So how can on
What do you all think about upgrading our Trac server? We're currently on
Trac version 0.11.5, which is more than two years old. The entire 0.11.x
series (which went up to 0.11.7) is now deprecated. The latest version is
0.12.2.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To p
FWIW, i just did a du -sch * on a recently built 4.7.1-rc2. The total is
just 2.5G and the filesystem is ext3. devel: 1.1G, local: 1G.
I have an additional idea. If you have a recent linux kernel and want to
save space via the filesystem, you can try btrfs with its builtin
compression. Just add
41 matches
Mail list logo
