Re: [sage-devel] building the reference manual faster

2011-07-25 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:42 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > The patches at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6495 should speed > up building the reference manual.  On sage.math, applying the patches made > the build time for the html version go from just under 18 minutes to 2.5 > minutes, wi

[sage-devel] Re: Review some tickets!

2011-07-25 Thread Rob Beezer
On Jul 25, 4:39 pm, John H Palmieri wrote: > To the Sage developers: > > There are 220 tickets on trac needing review right now.  Please review some > of them! John, thanks very much for putting out the call and reminding folks about reviews. At least 16 of those tickets waiting for reviews are

[sage-devel] Re: Sage & Pari

2011-07-25 Thread rjf
There seem to be two issues here. 1. It would be nice for Pari to get credit when Pari is used, even if the user gave credit to Sage. and 2. (Bill Hart's assertion) that citing an algorithm that you haven't studied is like citing a paper you haven't read. Regarding item 1. If you accept code und

[sage-devel] Re: Sage & Pari

2011-07-25 Thread Simon King
Hi Bill, let me comment on the "how to cite individual Sage components" topic. On 26 Jul., 00:18, Bill Hart wrote: > * Citing a Number Theory package you know nothing about in published > research is about as dubious as citing a paper you have never read. > Unless you are prepared to read the co

[sage-devel] building the reference manual faster

2011-07-25 Thread John H Palmieri
The patches at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6495 should speed up building the reference manual. On sage.math, applying the patches made the build time for the html version go from just under 18 minutes to 2.5 minutes, with similar speed-ups for the pdf version. It also allows you t

[sage-devel] Re: Sage & Pari

2011-07-25 Thread Bill Hart
Can we please be more precise and scientific when discussing this important issue. I find it confusing to try to think about the many issues raised without some precision. Some trivialities first. Please take care to distinguish: * finding a bug in Pari and contributing a bug report * finding a b

Re: [sage-devel] Re: memory leak

2011-07-25 Thread Jonathan Bober
Thanks! 11468 fixed the leak. While I was at it I gave 11495 a positive review also. On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: > I tested your function on my Sage 4.7.alpha? install with 11468 (not > 14468...) and 11495 and I do not seem tp get the leak: > sage: leak() > 0.46875 >

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage iPhone app

2011-07-25 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Jul 25, 2011, at 3:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote: > On 7/24/11 4:08 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: >> On Jul 24, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Jason Grout wrote: >>> On 7/23/11 2:50 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: Dear Sage iPhone users, >>> >>> Have you thought about using sagemath.org:5467 ? Two students and >>> I have

Re: [sage-devel] Adding new unit tests

2011-07-25 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 07/20/11 13:26, Burcin Erocal wrote: > > If you are adding tests only for integration, starting a new file > sage/symbolic/tests.py might be better. > > ... > > Don't forget to mention the ticket number in the test. > How's this looking? -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-dev

Re: [sage-devel] Sage & Pari

2011-07-25 Thread John Cremona
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2011-07-25 15:40, John Cremona wrote: >> A second point Karim made is that he would like to see more more cases >> (currently: 0)  in which a deficiency in a part of Pari used by Sage >> -- for example, some number field functionality --

Re: [sage-devel] Sage & Pari

2011-07-25 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
On 2011-07-25 15:40, John Cremona wrote: > A second point Karim made is that he would like to see more more cases > (currently: 0) in which a deficiency in a part of Pari used by Sage > -- for example, some number field functionality -- was fixed by > contributions to Pari itself, rather than by a

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage iPhone app

2011-07-25 Thread Ivan Andrus
On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:31 AM, Rado wrote: > I do have some other specific questions that might be easier to answer: > > - Where should I host the source code? as part of Sage or separately e.g. on > bitbucket? > > Sagenb is on google code. It makes sense to have a separate project for the > ap

[sage-devel] Sage & Pari

2011-07-25 Thread John Cremona
I had an interesting conversation with Karim Belabas, lead developer of the Pari project (which Sage relies on for many things, including most number field functionality). I specifically asked him how he saw the Sage/Pari relationship. I have CC'ed him to this email, and hope that if there is any

[sage-devel] Re: Sage iPhone app

2011-07-25 Thread Jason Grout
On 7/24/11 4:08 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote: On Jul 24, 2011, at 6:15 AM, Jason Grout wrote: On 7/23/11 2:50 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote: Dear Sage iPhone users, I finally took the time to fix the icons on the iPhone app I've been working on so that I'm not completely embarrassed by them. For those that w

[sage-devel] Re: where to put Sidon g-sets?

2011-07-25 Thread Martin Raum
Thank you for the help. This is now #11624. Martin On 25 Jul., 14:31, Nicolas Borie wrote: > Le lundi 25 juillet 2011 à 04:47 -0700, Martin Raum a écrit : > > > Hello all, > > Hello Martin, > > > I happened to think about Sidon g-sets and to do some computations I > > implemented a recursive enu

[sage-devel] Re: Sage iPhone app

2011-07-25 Thread Jason Grout
On 7/24/11 3:31 PM, Rado wrote: That's a really tricky question, probably people will have to play with it for a bit before they realize what will work best. I would leave it as a work in progress ;) One thing that comes to mind is having a "close the matching paren or quote" button (like CTRL+

Re: [sage-devel] where to put Sidon g-sets?

2011-07-25 Thread Nicolas Borie
Le lundi 25 juillet 2011 à 04:47 -0700, Martin Raum a écrit : > Hello all, Hello Martin, > I happened to think about Sidon g-sets and to do some computations I > implemented a recursive enumeration of such sets. Clearly, this would > go into the combinatorics tree. I am not an expert in combinato

[sage-devel] where to put Sidon g-sets?

2011-07-25 Thread Martin Raum
Hello all, I happened to think about Sidon g-sets and to do some computations I implemented a recursive enumeration of such sets. Clearly, this would go into the combinatorics tree. I am not an expert in combinatorics. Since the code doesn't seem to fit in any of the files in sage/ combinat, pleas

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Coxter Groups

2011-07-25 Thread Nicolas Borie
Le dimanche 24 juillet 2011 à 15:38 -0700, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > On Sunday, 24 July 2011 22:37:05 UTC+1, Rafael T wrote: > > The gap-system already has the ability to work with Coxeter > groups: > http://www.gap-system.org/Gap3/Manual3/C075S005.htm Maybe I >

[sage-devel] Re: memory leak

2011-07-25 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
I tested your function on my Sage 4.7.alpha? install with 11468 (not 14468...) and 11495 and I do not seem tp get the leak: sage: leak() 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875 0.46875

[sage-devel] Re: memory leak

2011-07-25 Thread Jean-Pierre Flori
Ticket 11521 which seems to be nothing but 715 looks similar, but does not seem related. You could also try applying 14468 and 11495 (patches but no reviews yet, one is just a very old bug which has been unfortunately rolled back). They affect multi polynomial rings used by elliptic curves. Final

[sage-devel] memory leak

2011-07-25 Thread Jonathan Bober
I just found the following memory leak: def leak(): K. = NumberField(x^2 - x - 1) m = get_memory_usage() for n in xrange(10): E = EllipticCurve(K, [3,4,5,6,7]) if n % 1000 == 0: print get_memory_usage() - m sage: leak() 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.5 3