On Jun 20, 2:01 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> Escaping a word is one solution, but to be honest I don't see anything wrong
> with what I did, which is to provide a link to a description of what a complex
> number is. Especially for more complicated terms, this would actually be
> useful
> to so
On 06/20/11 03:14 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Jun 18, 3:45 pm, leif wrote:
On Jun 17, 12:39 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
On 06/17/11 07:30 AM, Kelvin Li wrote:
On Jun 16, 3:05 pm, Keshav Kiniwrote:
I would say no, but it looks like it was created by David Kirkby, who
generally is someon
On 2011-06-20 17:53, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> What is the purpose of this milestone? Things that would be positive
> review, but you want the merge script to ignore them?
Essentially yes. Except that it's not the merge script but me personally.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-de
Indeed, this is very important. Mercurial patches are lossy by default.
Putting those lines in your .hgrc will make Mercurial use the lossless git
diff format for patches instead. Trac #11121 makes Sage's Mercurial use git
diff format by default - it's awaiting review ;)
-Keshav
Join us i
Note that this is the trac wiki, not the moinmoin wiki (i.e. the sage wiki).
The trac wiki uses trac linking syntax, including camelcase (akin to
wikiwikiweb). The sage wiki uses explicit wikilinks (akin to mediawiki).
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:02 PM, leif wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 14, 7:49 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>> On 2011-06-10 18:22, Robert Bradshaw wrote:> Maybe pending? Is this for
>> positively reviewed tickets?
>> [...]
>> > Is "needs-info" insufficient.
>>
>> I think that "needs_info" means something diff
Oops.. Sorry. This was meant for support.
On Jun 20, 10:11 am, Chris Seberino wrote:
> I created a little worksheet
> calledhttp://phil4.com/public/sage/Scientific_Notation.sws
> to illustrate the problem.
>
> The single cell with code has this...
>
> %hide
> %auto
> @interact
> def _(exponent=
I created a little worksheet called
http://phil4.com/public/sage/Scientific_Notation.sws
to illustrate the problem.
The single cell with code has this...
%hide
%auto
@interact
def _(exponent=(-6..6)):
html('The Number: $%f$'%(5 * 10**exponent))
html('In Scientific Notation: $5 \cdot 10^{%d}$
On Jun 18, 3:45 pm, leif wrote:
> On Jun 17, 12:39 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>
> > On 06/17/11 07:30 AM, Kelvin Li wrote:
>
> > > On Jun 16, 3:05 pm, Keshav Kini wrote:
> > >> I would say no, but it looks like it was created by David Kirkby, who
> > >> generally is someone who knows what
