On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:02 PM, leif <not.rea...@online.de> wrote: > > > On Jun 14, 7:49 pm, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote: >> On 2011-06-10 18:22, Robert Bradshaw wrote:> Maybe pending? Is this for >> positively reviewed tickets? >> [...] >> > Is "needs-info" insufficient. >> >> I think that "needs_info" means something different and is actually >> quite close to "needs_work". For example, there might be something >> wrong with the patch but it's not completely clear that there is >> actually something wrong. I also use "needs_info" for missing >> Author/Reviewer names. > > Yep. To me "needs info" means either the reviewer or the author(s) > cannot further proceed with the ticket without some direct response > from the author(s) or the reviewer, respectively. It doesn't > necessarily imply the need for "real" work (on the patches, spkgs > etc.); often the ticket's status is simply reverted to "positive > review" or "needs review" after an answer has been given.
What is the purpose of this milestone? Things that would be positive review, but you want the merge script to ignore them? - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
