On 6/17/11 11:05 PM, Kiran Kedlaya wrote:
(which lives on a 32-bit network and thus is a source of many bug
reports)
I'm curious: what is a 32-bit network?
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-deve
I succeeded in building 4.7 on my legendarily wonky 64-bit Fedora box
(which lives on a 32-bit network and thus is a source of many bug
reports). But as soon as I try to run doctests, I get the following
error on pretty much every file:
{{{
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/symbolic/constants.py"
Traceback
Hello,
There is a discrepancy between the documentation and behaviour of
partial sums of Fourier series:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8603
If the cut-off parameter is N, then the documentation says that N-th
term will be included, but it is not.
To fix it, one should either adjust t
Seems like it was fixed in 2008: revision
http://selenic.com/repo/hg/rev/9db24a36d182 fixing
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue1033
(?)
-Keshav
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@g
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Keshav Kini wrote:
> I asked some guys in #mercurial and they said they'd never heard of
> repository corruption from empty files or mercurial not being able to commit
> empty files. What's the reason for these comments? Or are they just FUD? :)
I believe patch is
What's up with these comments?
11870 Sat Mar 28 16:10:58 2009 -0700 sage/algebras/quatalg/__init__.py: #
quaternion algebra init file
14468 Sun Apr 25 12:04:13 2010 +0200 sage/coding/source_coding/__init__.py:
# Just a comment so that __init__.py is not an empty file.
9029 Sun Mar 23 19:08:49 20
Hi Rob and Javier,
Sorry I wasn't clear in my posting. I agree that the way things are
done now isn't correct, and what I'm suggesting is to have
elementary_divisors return the list of prime powers, and
invariant_factors return the m_i's. Rob's suggestion of doing this
within the finitely-genera
Hi Dan,
On 17 jun, 17:53, Dan Gordon wrote:
> Back in 2008 there was a discussion of the elementary_divisors
> function for abelian groups. While it's not universal, most group
> theory and algebra books define the elementary divisors of a finite
> abelian group G to be a list of prime powers su
As part of supporting Burcin Erocal's Sage booth in Germany next week,
I have a store of Sage stickers.
So, if you are running a Sage event or attending a local meeting, feel
free to request some stickers (with enough advance warning for me to
mail them to you via postal mail).
My contact info is
Hi Dan,
On Jun 17, 9:53 am, Dan Gordon wrote:
> I'd like to change the meaning of invariants and elementary_divisors
> for AbelianGroup. Are there objections to doing that?
I might be a bit slow, but I can't figure out exactly what you want to
change it *to*?
In any event, a (needs-work) patch
Back in 2008 there was a discussion of the elementary_divisors
function for abelian groups. While it's not universal, most group
theory and algebra books define the elementary divisors of a finite
abelian group G to be a list of prime powers such that G is isomorphic
to the direct product of cycli
On 06/17/11 07:30 AM, Kelvin Li wrote:
On Jun 16, 3:05 pm, Keshav Kini wrote:
I would say no, but it looks like it was created by David Kirkby, who
generally is someone who knows what he's doing...
... which is exactly what puzzles me, too. :-)
I did create it. There was some page on the Wi
12 matches
Mail list logo
