+1 to Simon. I find ipython's behavior more reasonable than the notebook's.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
Fo
Hi!
On 16 Jun., 06:57, Kwankyu Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In Sage Notebook, entering shift-enter after typing
>
> E=EllipticCurve?
>
> shows correctly the doc
Is that "correctly"? I would either expect to get an error, or
alternatively that the doc string is assigned to E.
Cheers,
Simon
--
To post
I now see that this is IPython' fault.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 at 03:09PM -0600, Ceigh Boone wrote:
> Assuming that you always have your browser running, it
> is a good idea that your math software runs inside it also, instead of
> hogging resources of it own. Is this true for trivial reasons? Do you have
> any insights?
I would say one tr
Hi
On Jun 15, 5:09 pm, Ceigh Boone wrote:
> Assuming that you always have your browser running, it
> is a good idea that your math software runs inside it also, instead of
> hogging resources of it own. Is this true for trivial reasons? Do you have
> any insights?
(1) It is nice to be able to ta
Hi,
In Sage Notebook, entering shift-enter after typing
E=EllipticCurve?
shows correctly the doc, but on commandline, we get
sage: E=EllipticCurve?
Object `E=EllipticCurve` not found.
This different behavior seems a bug. I am using Sage 4.7.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-d
Hello!
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 15:09:55 -0600
Ceigh Boone wrote:
> Hi all,
> Just wanted to check some facts. I'm giving a small talk about Sage,
> and I'm planning to say (just because it seems to me) that using the
> sage notebook is really big advantage compared to other programs that
> have h
This is now trac #11492.
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.g
Also keep in mind that the Sage notebook can be run remotely without any
extra effort, I think this is a big advantage.
Jeroen.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For mor
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Ceigh Boone wrote:
> Assuming that you always have your browser running, it
> is a good idea that your math software runs inside it also, instead of
> hogging resources of it own. Is this true for trivial reasons? Do you have
> any insights?
All of the memory and
Hi all,
Just wanted to check some facts. I'm giving a small talk about Sage, and I'm
planning to say (just because it seems to me) that using the sage notebook
is really big advantage compared to other programs that have heavier
graphical interfaces. Assuming that you always have your browser runn
Hi William,
On 15 Jun., 21:24, William Stein wrote:
> I have updated sagenb.org to sage-4.7. I intend to keep sagenb more
> up to date these days...
>
> I may have broken something though,
> sincehttp://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/2813is empty.
It was I who broke it: I stopped publishing it after
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:19 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!,
>
> At http://www.sagenb.org/home/pub/2813, I have published a worksheet
> that aims at explaining how one can implement a new parent and take
> advantage of both the category framework and the coercion model
> (including construction func
Hi Marco,
On 15 Jun., 17:52, mmarco wrote:
> ...
> Yes, that was exactly what i had in mind. A list of all the methods
> (and also functions), sorted by the name of the method, and links to
> the help of the method in question.
... and as Minh pointed out, that is exactly what the existing index
> The reference manual should have an index. Go to this page [1] and
> click on the link "index" in the upper right corner of your web
> browser. Apart from that, no other document in the standard
> documentation [2] have indices as exhaustive as the reference manual.
> If you want index entries f
Hi Minh,
On 15 Jun., 15:37, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> The reference manual should have an index. Go to this page [1] and
> click on the link "index" in the upper right corner of your web
> browser.
I have not been aware of it. It is in a format similar to what I have
suggested in my previous post.
Bu
Hi Marco,
On 15 Jun., 15:05, mmarco wrote:
> Talking with some coleague he told be that he thought that sage
> documentation was very bad. The reason he presented was that it was
> very difficult to find if some function or procedure was implemented.
If I am not mistaken, there are not so many
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:05 PM, mmarco wrote:
> Talking with some coleague he told be that he thought that sage
> documentation was very bad. The reason he presented was that it was
> very difficult to find if some function or procedure was implemented.
What about searching the reference
> I could try to install the SelfDelete plugin but there is a ticket on plugin
> trac page that is about adding support for trac 0.11 so there is a high
> propability it will not work. (although on the ticket they don't mention what
> breaks, or even if something breaks).
>
> If people think it'
Talking with some coleague he told be that he thought that sage
documentation was very bad. The reason he presented was that it was
very difficult to find if some function or procedure was implemented.
So i have thought that it might be a good idea to have an index of
functions and procedures. Ju
I could try to install the SelfDelete plugin but there is a ticket on plugin
trac page that is about adding support for trac 0.11 so there is a high
propability it will not work. (although on the ticket they don't mention what
breaks, or even if something breaks).
If people think it's a good id
Hi!
On 13 Jun., 18:40, Simon King wrote:
> BTW, since the flask notebook seems more stable than sagenb, I moved
> the worksheet (after some slight modifications)
> tohttp://flask.sagenb.org/home/pub/82/
Meanwhile I opened trac ticket #11490 about adding thematic tutorials
on coercion and catego
>
> Yes, I agree that some detailed books on Sage in Russian can
> substitute the Russian help. Maybe having some consistent books even
> better. In such case, what is the actual situation with the books on
> Sage?
>
> Regards,
>Vladimir
>
I think that there is some nice book on Sage in Frenc
Hello!
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 23:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
Andrey Novoseltsev wrote:
>
> Usefulness of this work is somewhat questionable as we will not be
> able to maintain these translations and it may lead to discrepancies
> between detailed documentation and actual commands. In addition, it
> becom
Hi Vladimir!
Sorry for not adding your full name, I have filled the ticket with
information that I could gather from the comments.
On Jun 14, 10:03 am, v...@ukr.net wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 07:58:10 -0700 (PDT)
>
> kcrisman wrote:
>
> > On Jun 14, 9:14 am, v...@ukr.net wrote:
> > > Hello!
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
