[sage-devel] Re: XCode 4

2011-05-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
This is now trac #11280 On May 2, 11:23 am, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > On May 2, 9:03 am, amaseam wrote: > > > > > > > 2011/4/30 Dima Pasechnik : > > > > On Apr 30, 12:54 pm, William Stein wrote: > > >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Dima Pasechnik > > >> wrote: > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > I tried

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Users of older OS X versions (< 10.6): please test

2011-05-01 Thread D. S. McNeil
Build succeeded and passed testall long for me on 10.5.8, xcode 3 (921.0/893.0), i686-apple-darwin9-gcc-4.0.1/i686-apple-darwin9-g++-4.0.1. Quad-Core Intel Xeon. Doug -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-d

[sage-devel] Re: XCode 4

2011-05-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On May 2, 9:03 am, amaseam wrote: > 2011/4/30 Dima Pasechnik : > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 12:54 pm, William Stein wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> > Hi, > > >> > I tried XCode 4 and came to conclusion that it is buggy as hell > >> > - I can't build working

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-release] sage-4.7.rc1 released

2011-05-01 Thread Francois Bissey
Hi Michael, I now think it is in fact a sage bug. Harald schilly had a slightly different version of that a month ago or so (with ecl or ecls in Gentoo speak). The problem is that you are in the sage environment and LD_LIBRARY_PATH set by sage is hiding the system libgd. If you look at the system

Re: [sage-devel] Re: XCode 4

2011-05-01 Thread amaseam
2011/4/30 Dima Pasechnik : > On Apr 30, 12:54 pm, William Stein wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> > Hi, >> >> > I tried XCode 4 and came to conclusion that it is buggy as hell >> > - I can't build working Sage (due to startup-time segfaults, as >> > described her

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Someone is spoofing my email address.

2011-05-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 05/ 1/11 04:08 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote: David, it's pretty usual to have this. Spammers harvest addresses on the net and use them in the From field. (my addresses are used like this for the last 15 years :)) It appears this was not simply that. I have a gmail account (drkir...@gmail.com),

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestions for Puiseux Expansion Implementation Location

2011-05-01 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Hi, I would like to see Puiseux series in Sage, implemented as an exact ring (in particular over the algebraic closure QQbar). I recommend you to examine the Puiseux series implementation in Magma as a benchmark. Kwankyu -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.co

[sage-devel] Re: Users of older OS X versions (< 10.6): please test

2011-05-01 Thread François
On May 2, 10:06 am, François wrote: > On May 1, 10:01 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:> It would > be useful if everybody who is running OS X 10.5 or older could > > report whether sage-4.7.rc1 builds and passes doctests.  Be sure to > > mention your gcc version (output of gcc --version), OS X versio

[sage-devel] Re: Users of older OS X versions (< 10.6): please test

2011-05-01 Thread François
On May 1, 10:01 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > It would be useful if everybody who is running OS X 10.5 or older could > report whether sage-4.7.rc1 builds and passes doctests.  Be sure to > mention your gcc version (output of gcc --version), OS X version and > whether you have an Intel or PPC proces

[sage-devel] Re: Can we afford a new attribute of sage.structure.element.Element?

2011-05-01 Thread Nils Bruin
On Apr 30, 1:51 pm, Simon King wrote: > I don't understand that. Can you elaborate? Perhaps on the ticket? I did, and I included some striking timings. The final effect for sage elements will be much smaller because there are so many other factors, but the timings do show that not having the data

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestions for Puiseux Expansion Implementation Location

2011-05-01 Thread Chris Swierczewski
Hello Marshall, It would be great to have Puiseux series in Sage. > I agree! > Hierarchically it seems it might make sense as a seperate module in > rings/polynomial, just as laurent_series_ring.py. It seems a little > categorically confusing (but perhaps convenient?) to add these as a >

[sage-devel] Re: Someone is spoofing my email address.

2011-05-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
David, it's pretty usual to have this. Spammers harvest addresses on the net and use them in the From field. (my addresses are used like this for the last 15 years :)) On May 1, 12:27 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > If you get an email that appears to come from me, that looks silly, then > pleas

[sage-devel] Re: Suggestions for Puiseux Expansion Implementation Location

2011-05-01 Thread mhampton
It would be great to have Puiseux series in Sage. Hierarchically it seems it might make sense as a seperate module in rings/polynomial, just as laurent_series_ring.py. It seems a little categorically confusing (but perhaps convenient?) to add these as a method to polynomials. Are you reusing any

[sage-devel] Users of older OS X versions (< 10.6): please test

2011-05-01 Thread Jeroen Demeyer
It would be useful if everybody who is running OS X 10.5 or older could report whether sage-4.7.rc1 builds and passes doctests. Be sure to mention your gcc version (output of gcc --version), OS X version and whether you have an Intel or PPC processor. Source archive for sage-4.7.rc1: http://boxen