That's on the current status of Boehm GC support on Apple's llvm-gcc
-- Forwarded message --
From: Asst. Prof. Dmitrii (Dima) Pasechnik
Date: 9 April 2011 12:21
Subject: Fwd: unable to compile GC using Apple's llvm-gcc (from XCode 4)
To: g...@linux.hpl.hp.com
Cc: Marius Schamschul
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> OS X comes with XCode, it's just not installed. It's just XCode 4 that
>>> costs $4.99. However, what happens if people install a
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> OS X comes with XCode, it's just not installed. It's just XCode 4 that
>>> costs $4.99. However, what happens if people install a
On 8 April 2011 21:17, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>> Or are you just arguing that XCode is
>> necessary because it's an easy way to a binary gcc.
>
> I don't know how to install GCC on OS X, except by installing XCode.
> There is a lot more to GCC t
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> OS X comes with XCode, it's just not installed. It's just XCode 4 that
>> costs $4.99. However, what happens if people install a binary gcc?
>
> How?
http://hpc.sourceforge.net/
>
>
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Tim Lahey wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> In order to use Cython on OS X, one currently needs XCode. Cython is
>> a really core feature of Sage.
>> E.g., I talk about it a lot in my Sage course for undergrads [1], and
>> on
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 3:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> In order to use Cython on OS X, one currently needs XCode. Cython is
> a really core feature of Sage.
> E.g., I talk about it a lot in my Sage course for undergrads [1], and
> on Wednesday I had some very confused
> students in class that
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 12:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:21 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> On 7 April 2011 02:52, Felix Lawrence wrote:
>>> For many people, this would make Sage no longer free - it would
>>> effectively cost $5 and none of that money goes to Sage.
>>
>> Well,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:21 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 7 April 2011 02:52, Felix Lawrence wrote:
>> For many people, this would make Sage no longer free - it would
>> effectively cost $5 and none of that money goes to Sage.
>
> Well, that's a bit of an exaggeration. We can give them a Sage bina
On Apr 9, 12:29 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> On 04/ 8/11 12:12 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> > I did a quick testing with llvm-gcc (renaming gcc and g++ --- on
> > MacOSX they are just symbolic links anyway)
> > and saw Sage 4.7.alpha3 installation choking on Boehm-GC spkg.
>
> > So this prob
Is anyone else chiming in here planning to be in Galway next week for
the De Brun workshop? I'm giving a talk related to doing such
computations on more modern hardware and architectures. (I've been
playing with a randomized parallel partition backtrack with C and
mpi/openmp/cuda.) There was also s
On 04/ 8/11 12:12 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
I did a quick testing with llvm-gcc (renaming gcc and g++ --- on
MacOSX they are just symbolic links anyway)
and saw Sage 4.7.alpha3 installation choking on Boehm-GC spkg.
So this probably means we'd need to upgrade this spkg at least, as it
is a coupl
Any chance you could get it working in a test installation of trac first? I
guess it's not a good idea to play around with the production environment,
as they say, or in this case the production trac server...
-Keshav
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To un
Well, it looks like someone has silently updated the website to point to
#sagemath instead of #sagedevel. Thanks, whoever it was!
As for info about the mailing lists, there seems to be a more comprehensive
list at http://sagemath.org/development.html , but I don't know after that
was updated af
I did a quick testing with llvm-gcc (renaming gcc and g++ --- on
MacOSX they are just symbolic links anyway)
and saw Sage 4.7.alpha3 installation choking on Boehm-GC spkg.
So this probably means we'd need to upgrade this spkg at least, as it
is a couple of years old
(but it's the latest stable ver
On Apr 8, 3:12 pm, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> Hi Dima!
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:55:32PM -0700, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > > - is there a Sage implementation of permutation groups, or only the
> > > gap implementation (it takes very long to go through the elements of a
> > > perm
Hi Robert,
On Apr 8, 2:54 pm, Robert Miller wrote:
> In another thread (finite complex reflection groups and matrices over
> the universal cyclotomic field), Christian wrote:
> > - is there a Sage implementation of permutation groups, or only the
> > gap implementation (it takes very long t
> Hi François,
>
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:08:57PM +1200, Francois Bissey wrote:
> > Following an initial post by Paulo from mandriva I started
> > to look at using sage with python-2.7 (2.7.1 in fact).
> > The news is two fold:
> > 1) sage seems to work ok. It starts.
> > 2) a good deal
Hi Pablo!
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:17:12AM +0200, Pablo Angulo wrote:
> I've found a very weird error trying to get some files pass the
> automated testing: I got the same "Expected" and "Got", but the test
> failed. Copy the following text to devel/sage/sage/misc/example.py:
>
> # -*-
Hi François,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 02:08:57PM +1200, Francois Bissey wrote:
> Following an initial post by Paulo from mandriva I started
> to look at using sage with python-2.7 (2.7.1 in fact).
> The news is two fold:
> 1) sage seems to work ok. It starts.
> 2) a good deal of the test s
I've found a very weird error trying to get some files pass the
automated testing: I got the same "Expected" and "Got", but the test
failed. Copy the following text to devel/sage/sage/misc/example.py:
# -*- coding: utf-8 -*
def f(text):
"""
EXAMPLES::
sage: from sage.misc.exampl
Hi Robert!
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:54:16PM -0700, Robert Miller wrote:
> Tom wrote:
> > Robert Miller has been hard at work implementing stabilizer chains for
> > permutation groups (see #10804). It should be fairly easy to
> > enumerate iterate over the elements of a permutation group
Hi Dima!
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:55:32PM -0700, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > - is there a Sage implementation of permutation groups, or only the
> > gap implementation (it takes very long to go through the elements of a
> > permutation group, even in small examples)?
> Could you provide an
23 matches
Mail list logo
