On 3/4/11 12:52 AM, Simon King wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 3 Mrz., 22:48, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
I think allowing letters like ç is just fine, what I'm opposed to is
letting our definition of valid symbol names vary from platform to
platform and local to local.
So, a useful definition would be to re
Hi Robert,
On 3 Mrz., 22:48, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I think allowing letters like ç is just fine, what I'm opposed to is
> letting our definition of valid symbol names vary from platform to
> platform and local to local.
So, a useful definition would be to restrict to ASCII identifiers (no
uni
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:12 PM, luisfe wrote:
> The difference is with sage.all
>
> $ sage -ipython
> Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Jan 15 2011, 11:46:28)
> Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>
> IPython 0.9.1 -- An enhanced Interactive Python.
> ? -> Introduction a
On 3 March 2011 19:26, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 20:16, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> IIRC we have not been successful in recent times. Do we get any feedback
>> why?
>
> No, one vague guess is that there is a limit for each topic and we are
> - obviously - in a small "math s
We've seen this before and if memory serves correctly it is due to an
old assembler or compiler version. I can only recommend upgrading
them.
On Mar 1, 3:16 pm, Jan Raasch wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> so I'm running Mac OS X 10.6 (Snow Leopard) on a first generation
> MacBook (Yeah, the one with the ol
The difference is with sage.all
$ sage -ipython
Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Jan 15 2011, 11:46:28)
Type "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
IPython 0.9.1 -- An enhanced Interactive Python.
? -> Introduction and overview of IPython's features.
%quickref -> Quick referen
On Mar 2, 8:29 pm, Jonathan Hanke wrote:
> Help out a fellow colleague with his promotion file. Have you ever
> used quadratic forms in Sage? If so, please send me an email at
> letting me know, or just respond to this email.
I have used them to help me figure out examples for a grad number
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Robert,
>
> On 3 Mrz., 20:02, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Simon King wrote:
>> > Hi Burcin and all,
>>
>> > On 2 Mrz., 17:36, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> >> People might want to use utf-8 strings which won't be v
Yes, and I can chime in to having used them in:
(1) computing Heegner points
(2) computing Kolyvagin classes, where finding representation
numbers of ternary quadratic forms is important
(3) computing Brandt matrices, i.e., Hecke operators on the free
abelian group on right ideal classes i
Hi Robert,
On 3 Mrz., 20:02, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Simon King wrote:
> > Hi Burcin and all,
>
> > On 2 Mrz., 17:36, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> >> People might want to use utf-8 strings which won't be valid under that
> >> condition. See #7496:
>
> >>http://trac.sa
On Mar 3, 1:25 pm, mmarco wrote:
> I have been trying to build a proof of concept of a class that would
> handle the geogebra integration in the worksheet.
>
> My basic idea was to have a .show() method that would create the
> applet itself, and then define some methods that use the javascript
>
> > What is needed to do in order to "localize" a regular expression?
>
> -100 for valid identifiers/sage variable names to be a function of the
> users locality.
Yeah, that could make sharing worksheets and/or code really tough.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroup
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 20:16, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> IIRC we have not been successful in recent times. Do we get any feedback
> why?
No, one vague guess is that there is a limit for each topic and we are
- obviously - in a small "math software" topic. Let's see, trying
again doesn't hurt.
H
On 03/ 3/11 06:19 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
I'm in charge this year. I'll write something up and everybody how wants to
be a possible mentor please contact me (I'll also contact some usual
suspects).
greetings Harald
IIRC we have not been successful in recent times. Do we get any feedback why
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Harald Schilly wrote:
> I'm in charge this year. I'll write something up and everybody how wants to
> be a possible mentor please contact me (I'll also contact some usual
> suspects).
>
> greetings Harald
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:52 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Burcin and all,
>
> On 2 Mrz., 17:36, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> People might want to use utf-8 strings which won't be valid under that
>> condition. See #7496:
>>
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7496
>
> I was reading in the Python
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:08 AM, luisfe wrote:
> Could someone highlight why the following happens?
>
> from a sage session, the names that can be imported from
> sage.rings.integer_ring are:
>
> {{{
> EuclideanDomains Z factor
> is_IntegerRing
> IntegerRing ZZ
On Wednesday, February 23, 2011 10:56:10 PM UTC+1, robertwb wrote:
>
> And this is with the directory presumably in the FS cache.
... just because I read this, you can flush the disk cache via:
sudo sh -c "sync && echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"
H
--
To post to this group, send an email
I'm in charge this year. I'll write something up and everybody how wants to
be a possible mentor please contact me (I'll also contact some usual
suspects).
greetings Harald
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Could someone highlight why the following happens?
from a sage session, the names that can be imported from
sage.rings.integer_ring are:
{{{
EuclideanDomains Zfactor
is_IntegerRing
IntegerRing ZZ factorizationring
IntegerRing_classari
Hi Burcin and all,
On 2 Mrz., 17:36, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> People might want to use utf-8 strings which won't be valid under that
> condition. See #7496:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7496
I was reading in the Python docs of the re module that the meaning of
\w depends on the lo
On 3 Mrz., 09:21, Simon King wrote:
> If it would work, I think the test above should be implemented as a
> function in sage.misc.defaults. In that way, it could also be used by
> normalize_variable_names.
I meant "used by sage.structure.parent_gens.normalize_names".
--
To post to this group, s
Hi Nils and all,
On 3 Mrz., 08:25, Nils Bruin wrote:
> A possibly somewhat heavyhanded approach:
>
> sage: import tokenize,StringIO
> sage: S="QQ['t'], a, a_2, for"
> sage: list((a[0],a[1]) for a in
> tokenize.generate_tokens(StringIO.StringIO(S).readline))
> [(1, 'QQ'), (51, '['), (3, "'t'"), (5
23 matches
Mail list logo
