On 3 March 2011 19:26, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 20:16, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> > wrote: >> IIRC we have not been successful in recent times. Do we get any feedback >> why? > > No, one vague guess is that there is a limit for each topic and we are > - obviously - in a small "math software" topic. Let's see, trying > again doesn't hurt. > > H
Perhaps a very different approach is needed. One thing I feel Sage lacks is engineering applications. How about basing the applications upon building engineering applications on the top of maths software, rather than adding more maths? It may be seen by Google that their injection of money will make little difference if it just adds yet more maths skills to a project which is primarily built by mathematicians. Just a thought. It's probably worth having a rethink, as recent applications have been unsuccessful, so unless the formula is changed, it is quite likely we will fail again. dave -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
