It's definitely supported in Firefox; Opera says it will implement it
in time, Webkit not for now.
The good news is that even if it is only supported in Firefox for now,
it has no adverse effect in other browsers.
See the link below to learn more. Note that support might have
progressed in other br
Hi Minh,
This is exactly what I was looking for! Thanks!
The reason we want to specify a different directory is we have a
special Sage installation which we don't want to interfere with the
system-wide one. This installation is likely only to be used by a
single user (the user who installed our l
The Goto Blas are now under BSD license.
http://www.tacc.utexas.edu/tacc-projects/gotoblas2/
This could be a replacement for Atlas (these blas are supposed to be
faster).
t.d.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
Hi folks,
I vaguely remember a thread started by Nathann Cohen about moving some
implementation of graph theoretic algorithms to some sort of algorithm
modules. From what I can recall, it had something to do with the bloat
of methods that each instance of a graph object has. For example, as
of Sag
On Dec 6, 10:53 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Robert (and whoever else is working on the buildbot [1]),
>
> First of all, THANK YOU!!! This is amazing! I love how it is hooked up
> to show the status on trac.
Indeed -- THANKS ! ! !
>
> Could we add building documentation to the things that it che
Robert (and whoever else is working on the buildbot [1]),
First of all, THANK YOU!!! This is amazing! I love how it is hooked up
to show the status on trac.
Could we add building documentation to the things that it checks for
each ticket?
Thanks,
Jason
[1] http://sage.math.washington.ed
On Dec 6, 11:15 am, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:01 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> > On 4 December 2010 05:32, William Stein wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, David Kirkby
> >> wrote:
>[*snip*]
> > It's fairly clear in the past that the "Expected" result from a test
>
On 12/05/2010 06:38 PM, Maxim wrote:
> I would like to know if it could be considered to add a feature that
> would allow one to disable spell-checking inside a worksheet. I often
> find my code all underlined in red, and need to disable spell-checking
> for every code block that I create (it's on
On 6 déc, 11:55, Adam Voss wrote:
> It may be by particular configuration, but spellcheck was not
> executing in workbook cells with Firefox 3 on Linux.
That's weird, I'm using Firefox 3.6 on Linux, too. As far as I can
tell, spell-checking was always
turned on in the workbook.
> I recently m
Hello Sebastian,
On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 at 08:50AM -0800, slabbe wrote:
> ==
> sage -rst2html
> ==
>
> It would be nice to implement the command:
>
> sage -rst2html input.rst output.html
>
> that would convert a rst file into a html file like does the usual
> command:
>
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> On 12/6/10 5:49 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>>
>>> We want to give a URL for some Sage library source code, for example:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/120c07be6358/sa
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 8:01 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> On 4 December 2010 05:32, William Stein wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>
>>> It's clear you have the ability to write decent tests, but I think its
>>> fair to say there are a lot of Sage developers who have les
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 4:08 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 12/6/10 5:49 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> We want to give a URL for some Sage library source code, for example:
>>
>>
>> http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/120c07be6358/sage/modular/cusps_nf.py
>>
>> but this link is specific to version 4
> [1]http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8395
Thanks - after applying the patches, it works!
Best, Christian
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, v
It may be by particular configuration, but spellcheck was not
executing in workbook cells with Firefox 3 on Linux. I recently made
the upgrade to Firefox 4 Beta and was extremely happy to see spell
check happening in cells. For me because my code is relatively
heavily commented and it always loo
Hi sage-devel,
I am more an more using .rst files for myself and I am thinking of
implementing new scripts that I think would be usefull. Below I
describe what are those commands. I still don't know exaclty how to
code them, so if you have any ideas, suggestions I'm interested.
==
sag
On 4 December 2010 05:32, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:40 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> It's clear you have the ability to write decent tests, but I think its
>> fair to say there are a lot of Sage developers who have less knowledge
>> of this subject than you [=Bradshaw].
>
> Tr
On 2010-12-06 12:13, Matthew Gwynne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are trying to build Sage on a 64-bit OpenSuse 11.0 machine and am
> getting the following error -
Can you try the development version of Sage at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.6.1.alpha3/sage-4.6.1.alpha3.tar
and report
Hi Matthew,
On 6 Dez., 12:22, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 12/6/10 5:09 AM, Matthew Gwynne wrote:
> > Is it possible when compiling Sage, or as an option when running it,
> > to force it to always take a particular given directory as the
> > configuration ".sage" directory rather than creating it in t
Thanks Jason, that works perfectly!
John
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 12/6/10 5:49 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>
>> We want to give a URL for some Sage library source code, for example:
>>
>>
>> http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/120c07be6358/sage/modular/cusps_nf.py
On 12/6/10 5:49 AM, John Cremona wrote:
We want to give a URL for some Sage library source code, for example:
http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/120c07be6358/sage/modular/cusps_nf.py
but this link is specific to version 4.6 and so will (presumably)
change for future releases. Is there any w
We want to give a URL for some Sage library source code, for example:
http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/120c07be6358/sage/modular/cusps_nf.py
but this link is specific to version 4.6 and so will (presumably)
change for future releases. Is there any way we can refer to this
file using a URL w
Hi Matthew,
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Matthew Gwynne wrote:
> We are trying to build Sage on a 64-bit OpenSuse 11.0 machine and am
> getting the following error -
Ticket #9523 is relevant to your build error regarding readline under
OpenSUSE. See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket
Hi Matthew,
I'm not sure I understand your question correctly, but here goes...
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:09 PM, Matthew Gwynne wrote:
> Is it possible when compiling Sage, or as an option when running it,
> to force it to always take a particular given directory as the
> configuration ".sage" d
On 12/6/10 5:09 AM, Matthew Gwynne wrote:
Hi,
We are building sage as part of a development environment which we'd
like to be isolated (as much as possible) from the rest of the system,
and on which users might have system-wide versions of sage other than
the one we installed in this special env
Hi,
We are trying to build Sage on a 64-bit OpenSuse 11.0 machine and am
getting the following error -
gcc version 4.3.1 20080507 (prerelease) [gcc-4_3-branch revision
135036] (SUSE Linux)
Building a 32-bit version of Readline
Deleting old rea
Hi,
We are building sage as part of a development environment which we'd
like to be isolated (as much as possible) from the rest of the system,
and on which users might have system-wide versions of sage other than
the one we installed in this special environment.
Is it possible when compiling Sag
Hi!
I can finally announce a new patch for trac ticket #8800, which is
ready for review (and depends on #8807, which already has positive
review).
The original purpose of the ticket was to raise the doctest coverage
of sage.categories.functor and sage.categories.pushout to 100%. But
when I tried
On 2010-12-05 15:28, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> It seems that sage -f sagenb-VERSION doesn't actually do anything. It
> does NOT change the devel/sagenb-main directory. This issue also breaks
> upgrading sage-4.6 to sage-4.6.1.alpha3 for me, because sagenb is not
> actually upgraded. Either I'm doi
29 matches
Mail list logo
