On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason whatsoever to have g95 code in ATLAS, given we don't
>> build
>> ATLAS on OS X?
>
> No opinion - this sounds fine, but is beyond my knowledge.
>
>> > One more question about Mac --- how do you install gcc in there? Using
>>
> Is there any reason whatsoever to have g95 code in ATLAS, given we don't build
> ATLAS on OS X?
No opinion - this sounds fine, but is beyond my knowledge.
> > One more question about Mac --- how do you install gcc in there? Using
> > xcode? So I would just ship gfortran binary that is compatib
> On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
> > +1 to move to FC.
>
> I raised this back in November 2009 - William is against using FC.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg31854.html
>
I read the thread in question. I think more recent autotools don't check
fortra
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
>
>> +1 to move to FC.
>
> I raised this back in November 2009 - William is against using FC.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg31854.html
I read this, I think that
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal w
On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
+1 to move to FC.
I raised this back in November 2009 - William is against using FC.
http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg31854.html
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik wrote:
When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
these fortran issues as well. And I never understood
>>
On 09/12/10 01:07 AM, kcrisman wrote:
a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
it's not standard at all imho)
Agreed. I can't see the point of it.
Apparently because there was no gfortran for certain platforms. Now we
assume Linuces (?) have this, but as Dima d
On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik wrote:
When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
these fortran issues as well. And I never understood
a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
it's not st
> > a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
> > it's not standard at all imho)
>
> Agreed. I can't see the point of it.
>
Apparently because there was no gfortran for certain platforms. Now we
assume Linuces (?) have this, but as Dima demonstrates, with OS X
10.4, so
> On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> > When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
> > these fortran issues as well. And I never understood
> >
> > a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
> > it's not standard at all imho)
>
> A
On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
> these fortran issues as well. And I never understood
>
> a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
> it's not standard at all imho)
Agreed. I can't s
Just to be clear, I'm specifically talking about arithmetic by the
way. Anything for which the python overhead is completely irrelevant,
should of course be implemented in python.
Arithmetic really screws up almost every aspect of computing. There's
a group of related "full employment" problems wh
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> There's odd bits code scattered around in Sage that do tests for g95, which
> is an old Fortran 95 compiler that in any modern Linux or Unix systems.
>
> According to Wikipedia
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G95
>
> gfortran was
For really fast generics I think you may need some kind of jit.
Are generics handled by cython code or python code in sage? Does it
cache anything?
I recently encountered similar problems anyhow. A generic rref took 20
minutes to reduce a tiny (by my standards) matrix as part of a
factoring algor
On 9/11/10 1:27 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier.
On Sep 11, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 at 10:13AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
It is. I've also been testing this - you should try out the
very latest version:
http://boxen.math.washington.ed
I got stuck at scipy:
In the log below, the line beginning with
"sage_fortran -Wall -shared -Wall -shared -undefined dynamic_lookup -
bundle..."
definitely looks weird, as -shared option should not be there...
(I must also say that the error message looks weird, too, as there is
no option -dynamic
Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier.
On Sep 11, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 at 10:13AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
>> It is. I've also been testing this - you should try out the very
>> latest version:
>> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/
>> There are sti
Right now, the deprecation function (for giving deprecation warnings)
has an option to say when the deprecation took effect. Because of the
way release numbers are decided, and because patches can be delayed
getting in, saying when a deprecation took place is very hard, if not
practically im
Hi Rob,
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
> The
> sick green has always been a bit jarring to my eye. Maybe a light
> beige or cream? But not puce.
Done. Please see the latest patch to ticket #9850 [1]. A preview [2]
of what's to come is also attached with that ticket.
[1] htt
On Sep 11, 2:36 pm, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > Does current_randstate().set_seed_gap() actually sets GAP's random
> > seed, so that
> > subsequent GAP commands make use of the correctly set seed?
>
> Yep.
I see. Well, I am told that my GAP
21 matches
Mail list logo
