On 08/10/10 01:28 AM, William Stein wrote:
* Cephes Mathematical Library. Not in Debian. I cannot find any licensing
statement upstream nor in Sage's SPKG. I think it is free, but
debian-{policy,legal} will complain if we try to package this.
Maybe we should lobby for its removal f
-1
I am hoping the two of them are equal :-D
Nathann
On Aug 10, 10:55 am, Ben Edwards wrote:
> Just because there are a number of mathematicians on the list there is
> a potential proof of P!=NP out there that is being taken fairly
> seriously.
>
> http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/a-pro
Nathann Cohen schrieb:
Hello Everybody !!
I am currently writing a small patch to expose the write_graphml/gml
methods from the NetworkX library, and I noticed while testing he
docstrings that if write_gml worked perfectly, the read_gml was not
working at all (yes, I wrote the whole patch before
Just because there are a number of mathematicians on the list there is
a potential proof of P!=NP out there that is being taken fairly
seriously.
http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/08/a-proof-that-p-is-not-equal-to-np/
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On Aug 7, 2010, at 17:26 , kcrisman wrote:
Upgraded from .rc1 which was in turn upgraded from .rc0, on Mac OS X,
10.5.8 (Dual Quad Xeon), w/o problems.
One test failed (ptestlong):
devel/sage/sage/plot/plot3d/base.pyx
4 instances of "_imaging C module is not installed".
Try a searc
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 5:17 PM, CJ Fearnley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 05:44:32PM -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>> But now the situation is a bit different. Are we sure that we have all
>> the deps of sagemath packaged into Debian? If the answer is yes, then
>> I am happy to start with 4
Oh wow!! That shows a potentially really major speedup to
fmpz_poly_pow. Thanks Fredrick (for suggesting it) and Sebastian for
implementing it!
This one is going straight to the pool room (Australian slang), hence
the CC to sage.devel.
I'm also copying this to my student Daniel Woodhouse who is c
On Aug 7, 2010, at 14:13 , Mitesh Patel wrote:
Hi folks,
We're releasing Sage 4.5.2. Many thanks to everyone for their
contributions, including numerous patches, packages, reviews,
troubleshooting, emails & posts, and build & test reports!
Source archive:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/hom
Nathan, does this help?
Below my Sage root:
./local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/matplotlib/pyparsing.py
Rob
On Aug 9, 8:15 am, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Hello Everybody !!
>
> I am currently writing a small patch to expose the write_graphml/gml
> methods from the NetworkX library, and I noticed w
Hello, Carl.
You wrote 9 августа 2010 г., 19:58:12:
> Add this line at the top of check.py:
> import sage.all
Thanks!
I've added it on top of _alglib.py because
a) check.py, as every other file, explicitly imports _alglib.py
b) I prefer to modify one file instead of two
Apparently, it works
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Sergey Bochkanov
wrote:
> It is somehow connected to patch by Carl Witty which adds ability to
> work with Sage matrices/vectors. This patch works OK when package is
> used from Sage. But when we run test suite from spkg-check with
> "python check.py",
Hello Everybody !!
I am currently writing a small patch to expose the write_graphml/gml
methods from the NetworkX library, and I noticed while testing he
docstrings that if write_gml worked perfectly, the read_gml was not
working at all (yes, I wrote the whole patch before actually trying to
use t
On 8/3/10 7:52 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 03 Aug 2010 at 07:28AM -0700, Jason Grout wrote:
I just updated my MacTeX installation, and it said sagetex was
"deleted on server". I thought sagetex was included in the TeXLive
distribution (which is I believe what MacTeX is based on); was it
remove
On Friday 16 July 2010, Martin Albrecht wrote:
> I've opened a ticket at
>
>http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9515
>
> about creating an optional PyCryptoPlus package.
I've uploaded an SPKG and attached a link to that ticket. Happy reviewing.
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp:
Hi David,
On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Would it be sensible to suggest how to install these?
Yes, but not listing all possible commands.
> But I've no idea what distributions that would work on, and what it would
> not. I can't be bothered to go trying to find the d
I've just installed a few virtual Linux machines (32-bit Debian, 64-bit Debian
and 64-bit Mint). In each case prereq exits due to missing g++, gfortran or in
the case of mint, 'm4' too. So all these packages needed to be installed. I
think on Debian, gcc did too.
Would it be sensible to sugges
On 08/ 9/10 10:41 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
If anyone has a minute and could review the following, it would be good.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9643
Francois Bissey beat you all to it!!
Thank you Francois.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegr
If anyone has a minute and could review the following, it would be good.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9643
Apart from comments, the only change is
if [ "x`uname -rsm`" = "xSunOS 5.11 i86pc" ] && [ "x$SAGE64" = xyes ] ; then
to
if [ "x`uname -sm`" = "xSunOS i86pc" ] && [ "x$SAGE6
Hello!
New version of ALGLIB spkg is released. It can be downloaded from
http://www.alglib.net/share/2010-08-09-alglib-for-sage/
New version of spkg:
* compiles under OS X, SPARC/Solaris, Linux
* was tested wuth 2.7 and 3.1.2 branches of Python
* includes patch by Carl Witty whi
19 matches
Mail list logo
