Yes. I do not speak English.
I use a translator of Google.
Why unpacking: sage-4.5-linux-32bit-ubuntu_10.04_lts-i686-
Linux.tar.lzma
I get the message about the impossibility of creating hard links?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this gr
> Is there any chance you could write an email explaining the basic
> ideas behind your new factorization implementation? I'm just curious
> what goes into it. Even something along the lines of this page would
> be nice:
>
> http://magma.maths.usyd.edu.au/magma/htmlhelp/text315.htm
>
> -- W
Gentle reminders:
* Please remember to include the ticket number in the first line of the
commit string of each Mercurial patch. This makes it much easier to
find the ticket for a particular changeset with 'hg log some_file.py'.
* Please remember to update ticket "Author(s)" and "Reviewer(s)".
Several people had the test
test_zlib
when testing Python with SAGE_CHECK=yes.
This appears to be a bug in the python test, and only the test,
http://bugs.python.org/issue8193
so there's no point making any patches to zlib or python.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@goog
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Gonzalo Tornaria
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 6:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:01 PM, 3DRaven <3dra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi.
>>> "Tar not create hard links"
>>> What is it?
>>> sage not work.
>>
>> Either write clear emails to sa
On 07/19/10 11:20 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Jul-19 00:15:34 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
Here's a new GNU Scientific library package.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/gsl-1.14.spkg
can someone confirm it works on Cygwin. It takes less than a minute to build on
a
On 07/19/10 11:20 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Jul-19 00:15:34 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
Here's a new GNU Scientific library package.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/gsl-1.14.spkg
can someone confirm it works on Cygwin. It takes less than a minute to build on
a
On 07/19/10 10:37 PM, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2010-Jul-17 08:52:49 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
I don't know if you have every written multi-threaded code, but it is
non-trivial and very easy to make a mistake. Experience shows me that those
mistakes show up on on one platform only. It's ha
On 2010-Jul-19 00:15:34 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>Here's a new GNU Scientific library package.
>
>http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/patches/gsl-1.14.spkg
>
>can someone confirm it works on Cygwin. It takes less than a minute to build
>on
>a half-reasonable machine, so it wont
On 2010-Jul-17 08:52:49 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
>I don't know if you have every written multi-threaded code, but it is
>non-trivial and very easy to make a mistake. Experience shows me that those
>mistakes show up on on one platform only. It's hard enough to track the bug if
>you wrot
I've created a proof-of-concept WebGL backend for Sage plot3d in the
notebook; if you have a WebGL-enabled browser, see
http://sagenb.org/home/pub/2263/ . And if you don't have a
WebGL-enabled browser, you should get one; see
http://learningwebgl.com/blog/?p=11 .
WebGL is an emerging standard for
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:01 PM, 3DRaven <3dra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi.
> "Tar not create hard links"
> What is it?
> sage not work.
Either write clear emails to sage-support that makes sense, or you
will be banned.
William
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegro
Hi.
"Tar not create hard links"
What is it?
sage not work.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-dev
--
| Sage Version 4.5.1, Release Date: 2010-07-19 |
| Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information.|
--
*** stack smash
On Jul 18, 4:51 pm, koffie wrote:
> I started this thread so people can
> share which IDE's they are using and what they like about it.
jEdit
> Which OS does it run on (linux/os x/windows)?
anything that runs java
> Is it open source/free but not open source/paid?
open source/free (GPL 2.0),
On 19 July 2010 20:53, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:50 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>>> Does this mean that singular and pari-2.4 will be included or pushed
>>> to 4.5.2? I think singular is ready but I am not sure about pari.
>>
>> Making good progress -- I am hoping to get it fin
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, François Bissey
>
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several
> >> problems in my sagemath package. I was in vacation during most of
> >> Mandriva 2010.1 freeze, and did not fully test the package for some
> >>
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:01 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, François Bissey
>> wrote:
Hi,
Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several
problems in my sagemath package. I
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, François Bissey
> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several
>>> problems in my sagemath package. I was in vacation during most of
>>> Mandriva 2010.1 freeze, and
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 3:21 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Newer sympy has a bundled copy of mpmath, what causes several
>> problems in my sagemath package. I was in vacation during most of
>> Mandriva 2010.1 freeze, and did not fully test the package for some
>> time, but I am worki
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:50 PM, John Cremona wrote:
>> Does this mean that singular and pari-2.4 will be included or pushed
>> to 4.5.2? I think singular is ready but I am not sure about pari.
>
> Making good progress -- I am hoping to get it finished in the next few
> days but cannot promise. S
> Does this mean that singular and pari-2.4 will be included or pushed
> to 4.5.2? I think singular is ready but I am not sure about pari.
Making good progress -- I am hoping to get it finished in the next few
days but cannot promise. Some bugs have taken hours to find so far;
I will upload all t
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:37 PM, parisse
wrote:
>> Why? You just have to:
>>
>> (1) install sage
>
> This is not easy because I have a low Internet connection (max 2.6K/s)
> and sage is huge.
I understand. I think this explains why it would also be hard for
you to work on another remote comp
> Why? You just have to:
>
> (1) install sage
This is not easy because I have a low Internet connection (max 2.6K/s)
and sage is huge.
> If you want me to be giac user, I hope it isn't too much to ask that
> you be a Sage user :-).
>
Of course, I will certainly install it next time I have a g
Hello everyone,
The release note can be found here (I've folded 4.5 into 4.5.1):
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/sage-4.5.1.txt
The source tarball is here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.5.1.tar
Upgrading is slightly broken, but not terribly so like in sage-4.5
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:56 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, François Bissey
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We have noticed in sage-on-gentoo that the sage-4.5 tarball has
>> > been available for a few days but not the individual spkgs as far as
>> > we can see.
>>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, François Bissey
>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We have noticed in sage-on-gentoo that the sage-4.5 tarball has
> > been available for a few days but not the individual spkgs as far as
> > we can see.
> > Which means that sage -upgrade doesn't upgrade anything and
>
On 19 July 2010 19:04, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> Yes - see below.
>>
>> sage: quit
>> Exiting Sage (CPU time 0m0.29s, Wall time 0m3.52s).
>>
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x7e6627ec in _free_unlocked () from /l
It's also a good idea to name the package with
>> a version, e.g.,
>> giac-20100719.spkg, in which case it would extract to giac-20100719.
>>
>> I didn't expect your spkg to just work for me after the above rename,
>> so I wrote some stuff about debugging below.
I forgot to mention how to link it
g++ example_factor.cc -lgiac -lgmp -lpng
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.c
> Please remark the spkg so when you type
>
> tar jxvf giac.spkg
>
> you get a directory named "giac". This is a requirement of the spkg
> format, which
> I forgot to mention. It's also a good idea to name the package with
> a version, e.g.,
>
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 9:10 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> Yes - see below.
>
> sage: quit
> Exiting Sage (CPU time 0m0.29s, Wall time 0m3.52s).
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x7e6627ec in _free_unlocked () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x7e6627ec
On 19 July 2010 16:32, Alexander Dreyer
wrote:
> Hi!
>> Maybe, if the installation procedures makes use of python's distutils.
> In python 2.7 there the --no-user-config option to python setup.py.
> But backporting that would still need to add --no-user-config to 30+
> spkgs.
> (This is suggested
On 19 July 2010 16:36, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 04:33:59PM +0100, David Kirkby wrote:
>> I've tried under gdb.
>>
>>
>> kir...@t2:[~/sage-4.5-hacked-for-64-bit-solaris] $ ./sage -gdb
>
>>
>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>> 0x7e6627ec i
med "giac".This is a requirement of the spkg
format, which
I forgot to mention. It's also a good idea to name the package with
a version, e.g.,
giac-20100719.spkg, in which case it would extract to giac-20100719.
I didn't expect your spkg to just work for me after the above
Perhaps you could make a new function called something like
"find_fit_function" that returned an expression or function. This
could have optional arguments to force polynomial or trigonometric or
exponential fits.
Overall I agree that getting fits to data should be easier.
cheers,
Marshall Hampt
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 04:33:59PM +0100, David Kirkby wrote:
> I've tried under gdb.
>
>
> kir...@t2:[~/sage-4.5-hacked-for-64-bit-solaris] $ ./sage -gdb
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x7e6627ec in _free_unlocked () from /lib/64/libc.so.1
Do you get a gdb
I've built a 64-bit version of Sage on 't2', which behaves exactly the
same as one I built on my own SPARCs. It appears to work, but is quite
unstable. Whilst it can factor an integer, simply typing "quit" causes
a segfault. See below. On change I made before building was to save
the temporary file
Hi!
> Maybe, if the installation procedures makes use of python's distutils.
In python 2.7 there the --no-user-config option to python setup.py.
But backporting that would still need to add --no-user-config to 30+
spkgs.
(This is suggested in the case of rpms, for instance.)
An alternative would b
Hi
Re: jmol via SAGE on lucid using openjdk
Progress! The error has reduced. I still get:
2010-07-19 14:26:15+0200 [HTTPChannel,14,127.0.0.1] Request error: Connection
to the other side was lost in a non-clean fashion.
But no longer the rest of the errors. However, the end product, a jmol grap
Ok, I have added a link that should be updated when I make changes in
giac:
http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac/giac.spkg
(I also updated the benchmarks page
http://www-fourier.ujf-grenoble.fr/~parisse/giac/benchmarks/benchmarks.html).
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-
Paulo César Pereira de Andrade wrote:
2010/7/17 François Bissey :
As an aside, if two upstream packages include another upstream
package (e.g. both include GMP) what does Sage do? Are there
two copies of GMP? They could have different versions of the
same package since project 1 could have
On 19 July 2010 12:18, François Bissey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have noticed in sage-on-gentoo that the sage-4.5 tarball has
> been available for a few days but not the individual spkgs as far as
> we can see.
> Which means that sage -upgrade doesn't upgrade anything and
> we cannot push sage-4.5 ebuil
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, François Bissey
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have noticed in sage-on-gentoo that the sage-4.5 tarball has
> been available for a few days but not the individual spkgs as far as
> we can see.
> Which means that sage -upgrade doesn't upgrade anything and
> we cannot push sage
Hi,
We have noticed in sage-on-gentoo that the sage-4.5 tarball has
been available for a few days but not the individual spkgs as far as
we can see.
Which means that sage -upgrade doesn't upgrade anything and
we cannot push sage-4.5 ebuilds either as we rely on the individual
spkg to be available.
45 matches
Mail list logo
