> I would have thought python was pretty critical, but I can'f find a
> way of testing python. Although python is built with the usual
>
> configure
> make
> make install
>
> there is no 'make check'.
try 'make test'.
Francois
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.
.
>
> OK, but that doesn't fully answer my question. From appearance they look
> similar. Do they have the same codebase? Was sagenotebook developed from
> codenode or vice versa?
>
They have different code bases. I was one of the original creators of the
Sage Notebook (which came first)
and I'm
On Mon, 21 Jun 2010 01:40:06 +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> > It does not support interacts
>
> Can you explain what you mean by "interacts"?
http://wiki.sagemath.org/interact
Best,
Alex
--
Alex Ghitza -- http://aghitza.org/
Lecturer in Mathematics -- The University of Melbourne -- Australia
>> What is the relation between sagenotebook and codenode.org?
> My understanding is that Codenode was supposed to be a generalized
> Sage Notebook.
OK, but that doesn't fully answer my question. From appearance they look
similar. Do they have the same codebase? Was sagenotebook developed from
c
I reported yesterfay that only 19 of the 98 or so standard packages
have an spkg-check file, making it possible to test the packages as
Sage is built. None of the list below have any way of running
self-tests on the packages, though in many cases the upstream packages
have no test suites.
I've jus
If anyone has a minute or two,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9286
should be a trivial review.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this
Il 20/06/2010 23:25, Michele Comignano ha scritto:
But since python implementation doesn't reveal an error, it must be in
a backend implementation in some of the backends in
http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/2cffe66bd642/sage/graphs/base
that are extensions written in cython and it's too la
Seems to be related to #9086 - LaTeX representation of negative
symbolic fractions broken (http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/
9086).
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups
Il 20/06/2010 22:26, Nathann Cohen ha scritto:
Could you please give us an example of such a "strange behavior" when
using dictionaries as labels in Sage ?
Try the attached file. It creates a graph, then adds nodes and edges.
After, assigns a new element (a growing integer) to the label dict
Hello !!
Could you please give us an example of such a "strange behavior" when
using dictionaries as labels in Sage ?
Thanks !
Nathann
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co
Hi Florent,
I agree that this is a significant improvement on the old way of doing
it and it is almost functionally equivalent to what I am proposing.
There is one difference, however, in that the current method for
depreciating [sic] will not work if the syntax of the new version of
the function
Networkx, sage's graph structure backend permits to mantain a dictionary
of attributes associated to edges and vertices, but sage only permits to
associate a label to each edge.
Modeling a problem I needed to mantain such attributes externally to the
graph but this can be the way to errors if
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Andrew Mathas wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 20, 8:23 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
>> Important quibble: the word is deprecate.
>
> Only in north America!
In Python/Sage it is "deprecate".
William
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wste
On Jun 20, 8:23 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
> Important quibble: the word is deprecate.
Only in north America!
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit th
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> What is the relation between sagenotebook and codenode.org?
>
Here's a good explanation:
http://groups.google.com/group/codenode-devel/browse_thread/thread/9541cfc34db09a61
-Alex
>
> Ralf
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email t
Important quibble: the word is deprecate.
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Mathas wrote:
> Our current way of depreciating functions requires quite a bit of
> surgery on the departing functions. If we use decorations instead we
> could streamline this so that functions could be depreciate
Hi Andrew,
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:26:48AM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
> Our current way of depreciating functions requires quite a bit of
> surgery on the departing functions. If we use decorations instead we
> could streamline this so that functions could be depreciated by just
> puttin
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> What is the relation between sagenotebook and codenode.org?
My understanding is that Codenode was supposed to be a generalized
Sage Notebook. The project is inactive. It does not support interacts
and can not be used within Sage like Sage No
Our current way of depreciating functions requires quite a bit of
surgery on the departing functions. If we use decorations instead we
could streamline this so that functions could be depreciated by just
putting a @depreciation line before their definition.
A rough model of what I am thinking of i
What is the relation between sagenotebook and codenode.org?
Ralf
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/s
On Jun 20, 1:25 am, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> If anyones got a minute or two, the following package needs review. It should
> not take long, or be difficult, as there are only 4 lines changed (excluding
> comments).
Jaap Spies has kindly done this.
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an em
On Jun 10, 2010, at 11:08 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Jun 9, 2010, at 11:53 PM, Georg S. Weber wrote:
>>> On 10 Jun., 02:37, Jason Grout wrote:
Karl-Dieter just showed me how to get the OSX App built using sage
-bdist:
22 matches
Mail list logo
