[sage-devel] Re: only-optional

2010-06-18 Thread John H Palmieri
On Jun 18, 5:38 pm, Robert Miller wrote: > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, John H Palmieri > wrote: > > > Is the proper syntax documented anywhere?  I can't find it. Okay, see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9270 for documentation. I hope I have it right. See http://trac.sag

Re: [sage-devel] Re: only-optional

2010-06-18 Thread Robert Miller
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 5:21 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > Is the proper syntax documented anywhere? I can't find it. I could only find mention of it here: $ ./sage -advanced ... -t [-verbose] [-long] [-optional] [-only-optional=list,of,tags] -- test examples in .py, .pyx, .sa

[sage-devel] Re: only-optional

2010-06-18 Thread John H Palmieri
On Jun 18, 3:21 pm, Robert Miller wrote: > Learning about the sage -t -only-optional argument, I'm noticing that > there are quite a few modules which don't use the proper syntax. Is the proper syntax documented anywhere? I can't find it. (I might even suggest that if it's not documented, it is

[sage-devel] Re: only-optional

2010-06-18 Thread Robert Miller
On Jun 18, 3:21 pm, Robert Miller wrote: > Right now I'm fixing this in the graphs directory... See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9269 -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@goo

[sage-devel] Re: [Ecls-list] OpenSolaris issue : Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/18/10 01:41 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: Use of the dynamic foreign function interface is discouraged unless you have libffi around. Use --without-dffi or install the previously mentioned library in a place where ECL's configuration program can find it. I am not going to fix that ass

[sage-devel] only-optional

2010-06-18 Thread Robert Miller
Learning about the sage -t -only-optional argument, I'm noticing that there are quite a few modules which don't use the proper syntax. If the doctest is followed by a # optional -- pkg1, pkg2, pkg3 and the tester calls sage -t [...] -only-optional=pkg4,pkg5,[...]pkg6 then the doctest will be ru

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Ecls-list] Build of ECL breaks for parallel builds.

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/18/10 08:56 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: If one attempts to build ECL 10.4.1 (latest available stable release) in parallel, so the build goes wrong Yes, this is known, but I do not have time / skills to track the dependenci

Re: [sage-devel] Re: [Ecls-list] OpenSolaris issue : Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/18/10 08:50 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Is this dynamic foreign function interface needed for Maxima? Would you advise us to disable this on all platforms, or just OpenSolaris, given we do not have libffi in Sage? I frankl

[sage-devel] Re: [Ecls-list] Build of ECL breaks for parallel builds.

2010-06-18 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > If one attempts to build ECL 10.4.1 (latest available stable release) in > parallel, so the build goes wrong Yes, this is known, but I do not have time / skills to track the dependencies that break this. In general I run away from parall

[sage-devel] Re: [Ecls-list] OpenSolaris issue : Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'

2010-06-18 Thread Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 7:58 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Is this dynamic foreign function interface needed for Maxima? Would you > advise > us to disable this on all platforms, or just OpenSolaris, given we do not > have > libffi in Sage? > I frankly do not know. I suspect Maxima just uses stan

[sage-devel] Re: [Ecls-list] OpenSolaris issue : Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/18/10 01:41 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: Use of the dynamic foreign function interface is discouraged unless you have libffi around. Use --without-dffi or install the previously mentioned library in a place where ECL's configuration program can find it. I am not going to fix that ass

[sage-devel] Re: axiom.py

2010-06-18 Thread Adam Webb
A ticket should probably be opened for both axiom.py and fricas.py (or one for each). The parsing of the output is very simplistic and buggy. I would guess that some simple code was done to get the interface started but has not been developed further. Adam -- To post to this group, send an email

Re: [sage-devel] ECL/ maxima. We are in a bit of a mess.

2010-06-18 Thread William Stein
On Friday, June 18, 2010, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > On 06/18/10 05:08 PM, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Jun 18, 8:12 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" > wrote: > > > Sorry, it was the original purpose of #8951, but now #8951 has been expanded - > perhaps too much, as now it has a whole new version of ECL which se

Re: [sage-devel] Re: ECL/ maxima. We are in a bit of a mess.

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/18/10 05:08 PM, Nils Bruin wrote: On Jun 18, 8:12 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: Sorry, it was the original purpose of #8951, but now #8951 has been expanded - perhaps too much, as now it has a whole new version of ECL which seems to be stalled because of maxima http://trac.sagemath.org/

[sage-devel] Build of ECL breaks for parallel builds.

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
If one attempts to build ECL 10.4.1 (latest available stable release) in parallel, so the build goes wrong Here it is on a Sun Ultra 27 with a quad core hyper-threaded (8 threads) Xeon processor. I've set 12 threads running, using 'make -j 12'. This is on OpenSolaris, but it's clearly been ex

[sage-devel] Re: ECL/ maxima. We are in a bit of a mess.

2010-06-18 Thread Nils Bruin
On Jun 18, 8:12 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > Sorry, it was the original purpose of #8951, but now #8951 has been expanded - > perhaps too much, as now it has a whole new version of ECL which seems to be > stalled because of maxima http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8645 has a minimally

Re: [sage-devel] ECL/ maxima. We are in a bit of a mess.

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/18/10 03:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: There are a number of tickets "active" for updates to ECL. Several have positive review, but are based on different versions of ECL, Some of the fixes that supposed to be applied are not. Issues are * The new code to implement building SPKGs in para

[sage-devel] Re: Sage crossref...

2010-06-18 Thread Andrey Novoseltsev
Is it actually possible to build local Python documentation in addition to Sage one and link to it? Because even if all links are correct and everything is working nicely, it means that one has to have an active internet connection for *browsing* the documentation and I think it would be good to av

[sage-devel] Re: 2d hyperbolic geometry, homogeneous spaces, plot

2010-06-18 Thread Jason Grout
On 6/17/10 10:23 AM, Greg Laun wrote: Our geometry lab has a good deal of existing code for hyperbolic geometry, and one of my goals this summer is to port it to Sage. I spoke with Bill Goldman, who heads the lab, and he's on board with GPLing the code and releasing it into the Sage code base i

[sage-devel] Re: Sage crossref...

2010-06-18 Thread Jason Grout
On 6/16/10 4:44 AM, Florent Hivert wrote: A few questions / requests for a vote: - do we want this feature ? - do you think it is the right way to go or is it Ok to let sage access to Python site when compiling ? -1 to requiring access to the internet when compiling. - if Python updat

[sage-devel] ECL/ maxima. We are in a bit of a mess.

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
There are a number of tickets "active" for updates to ECL. Several have positive review, but are based on different versions of ECL, Some of the fixes that supposed to be applied are not. Issues are * The new code to implement building SPKGs in parallel needs a minor change to the the spkg-i

[sage-devel] axiom.py

2010-06-18 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
The last few lines in the _eval_line function of devel/sage/sage/interfaces/axiom.py look like outs = out.split("\n") i = 0 outline = '' for line in outs: line = line.rstrip() # print "'%s'"%line if line[:4] == ' (':

Re: [sage-devel] trac #2048 while humorous could be closed

2010-06-18 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 06/18/10 01:17 PM, Mariah Lenox wrote: trac #2048 while humorous could be closed Mariah Agreed, I've done it. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options,

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Sage-Notebook file format

2010-06-18 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
On 06/18/2010 01:55 PM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote: > Hi, sws it is gzipped (or bzipped) tar fille. Unzip, untar and bzipped and tarred... ;-) OK that helps. Thanks. > you should see text version and directories, one subdirectory for each > output cell. Yes. But the output cell directories are empt

[sage-devel] trac #2048 while humorous could be closed

2010-06-18 Thread Mariah Lenox
trac #2048 while humorous could be closed Mariah -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: h

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-Notebook file format

2010-06-18 Thread ma...@mendelu.cz
Hi, sws it is gzipped (or bzipped) tar fille. Unzip, untar and ypou should see text version and directories, one subdirectory for each output cell. Robert On 18 čvn, 12:02, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > Hello, > > I realized that the .sws File of a notebook is not a text file. > Would it be hard to als

[sage-devel] Sage-Notebook file format

2010-06-18 Thread Ralf Hemmecke
Hello, I realized that the .sws File of a notebook is not a text file. Would it be hard to also provide a text format that one could edit with any editor? What I see, when I press the "Edit" button already doesn't look too bad. Also when pressing the "Text" button, the notebook shows nice txt. (A

[sage-devel] Re: WorldMap graph

2010-06-18 Thread Nathann Cohen
> Why is it that we have the World graph hard-coded? Wouldn't it be > better to get an up-to-date world graph? Because it took me several hours of bash scripts, and bash scripts are often ugly, and even some python code, to build it :-D > (There are 100 more countries > on the CIA factbook---refe