Hi,
I re-enabled creation of accounts on sagenb.org.
I used symlinks and divide the directories into some subdirectories.
Let me know if there are suddenly mysterious problems.
-- William
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
To post to this
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
>> > [1] http://wiki.wstein.org/10/480b
>> > [2] http://wstein.org/edu/2010/480b/projects/
>>
>> Thanks.
>> What distribution license is used for the lecture notes and projects?
>>
>
> As far as the notes/assignments/anything else I wrote up th
> > [1] http://wiki.wstein.org/10/480b
> > [2] http://wstein.org/edu/2010/480b/projects/
>
> Thanks.
> What distribution license is used for the lecture notes and projects?
>
As far as the notes/assignments/anything else I wrote up there, it's
cc-by-sa.
-cc
--
To post to this group, send an e
Built with no problems and all tests ( ptestlong ) passed on Fedora 11
32 bit.
Cheers,
Doug Nadworny
On Jun 8, 4:39 pm, "Georg S. Weber"
wrote:
> On 8 Jun., 10:21, John Cremona wrote:
>
> > Built fine and all (ptestlong) tests passed on 32-but Suse and 64-bit
> > ubuntu.
>
> > John
>
> Same fo
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In case people are interested, the materials from the final projects
> for the Python/Sage course [1] that Craig Citro and I just taught are
> here [2]:
>
> [1] http://wiki.wstein.org/10/480b
> [2] http://wstein.org/edu/2010/480b/p
Hi folks,
MPIR 2.1.0 was released on 08th June 2010.
* source tarball: http://www.mpir.org/mpir-2.1.0.tar.gz
* documentation: http://www.mpir.org/mpir-2.1.0.pdf
* full changelog: http://www.mpir.org/changes.html
See the MPIR website (www.mpir.org) for known issues and a list of
supported platfor
Hi,
In case people are interested, the materials from the final projects
for the Python/Sage course [1] that Craig Citro and I just taught are
here [2]:
[1] http://wiki.wstein.org/10/480b
[2] http://wstein.org/edu/2010/480b/projects/
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of
Hi all,
is it on purpose that the method LazyFamily does not check membership
when calling __getitem__?
sage: a = Family( range(10), lambda i:i+2)
sage: a[4]
6
sage: a[100]
KeyError: 100
sage: b = Family( range(10), lambda i:i+2, lazy=True)
sage: b[4]
6
sage: b[100]
102
Do you also think that t
On 8 Jun., 10:21, John Cremona wrote:
> Built fine and all (ptestlong) tests passed on 32-but Suse and 64-bit ubuntu.
>
> John
>
Same for MacIntel OS X 10.4 (32bit).
Cheers,
Georg
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an em
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Mariah wrote:
> Would a kind person explain to me (or point me at documentation that
> explains) what the following two spkgs contain and are supposed to do:
>
> examples-4.4.3.spkg
This contains the files found under $SAGE_ROOT/examples/
> extcode-4.4.3.spkg
Thi
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Mariah wrote:
> Would a kind person explain to me (or point me at documentation that
> explains) what the following two spkgs contain and are supposed to do:
>
> examples-4.4.3.spkg
This is the directory SAGE_ROOT/examples.I think it should be
removed from Sage
On Jun 8, 2010, at 11:05 AM, leif wrote:
On 8 Jun., 19:25, Bill Hart wrote:
Flint for example, uses C99. However, use of C99 has caused problems
for porting to Windows.
Windows... ;-)
My recommendation would be to stick with ANSI C as much as
possible. I
doubt comments // will be a prob
On 06/08/2010 07:50 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
> Can PPL find integral points in polyhedra with not necessarily
> integral vertices (mixed integer programming)? I'm somewhat familiar
> with the library but I don't see how to do that. Code sample?
To be honest, I've only used it to compute linear desc
Would a kind person explain to me (or point me at documentation that
explains) what the following two spkgs contain and are supposed to do:
examples-4.4.3.spkg
extcode-4.4.3.spkg
(I am trying to get a better understanding of Sage by looking at
each of the spkgs.)
Mariah
--
To post to this grou
On 8 Jun., 20:33, William Stein wrote:
> It will be back soon...
Yes, it is up again.
Thanks,
-Leif
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this gro
It will be back soon...
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> Sagenb seems like it has been down for an hour or so. Does anyone know if
> it is a bigger problem than just a simple restart?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
> --
> To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegr
On 8 Jun., 19:57, Jason Grout wrote:
> Sagenb seems like it has been down for an hour or so. Does anyone know
> if it is a bigger problem than just a simple restart?
No idea. sagenb.org is "down" since at least a few hours (503 -
service temporarily not available, from boxen, which is up).
-Lei
On 8 Jun., 19:25, Bill Hart wrote:
> Flint for example, uses C99. However, use of C99 has caused problems
> for porting to Windows.
Windows... ;-)
> My recommendation would be to stick with ANSI C as much as possible. I
> doubt comments // will be a problem.
Though many compilers (and preproce
Sagenb seems like it has been down for an hour or so. Does anyone know
if it is a bigger problem than just a simple restart?
Thanks,
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegrou
Can PPL find integral points in polyhedra with not necessarily
integral vertices (mixed integer programming)? I'm somewhat familiar
with the library but I don't see how to do that. Code sample?
Volker
On Jun 8, 12:13 pm, Robert Schwarz wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
On 8 Jun., 14:21, Sergey Bochkanov
wrote:
> Hello, SAGE developers!
>
> I have a question about C standard which SAGE packages should conform
> to. Is it C99? Plain ANSI C? "Modern ANSI C", i.e. ANSI C which
> borrowed several features from C99?
I think you should *either* use ANSI C89, I
Flint for example, uses C99. However, use of C99 has caused problems
for porting to Windows.
My recommendation would be to stick with ANSI C as much as possible. I
doubt comments // will be a problem. The inline sematics are different
in c99 and in general cause a screwup across compiler versions.
On 8 June 2010 17:17, Matthew Gwynne wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As some additional points of interest/questions for this problem:
>
> 1. Version 2.7.2 was the last Sage version which could be installed.
> We tried most versions since then (latest 4.4.2), and they all failed
> with the same error.
Looking a
Hi,
As some additional points of interest/questions for this problem:
1. Version 2.7.2 was the last Sage version which could be installed.
We tried most versions since then (latest 4.4.2), and they all failed
with the same error.
2. It is always the same package which fails. We don't have any ot
Hello, SAGE developers!
I have a question about C standard which SAGE packages should conform
to. Is it C99? Plain ANSI C? "Modern ANSI C", i.e. ANSI C which
borrowed several features from C99?
I am working on Python<=>ALGLIB interface with intention to make it
usable from SAGE. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/08/2010 11:30 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> A long, long time ago there had been some discussion going on about the
> possible enumeration of the integer points of a polytope... By sheer
> luck, I learned today of such a software named PORTA :
>
>
Hello everybody !!!
A long, long time ago there had been some discussion going on about the
possible enumeration of the integer points of a polytope... By sheer luck, I
learned today of such a software named PORTA :
http://www.iwr.uni-heidelberg.de/groups/comopt/software/PORTA/
So if anyone is i
Built fine and all (ptestlong) tests passed on 32-but Suse and 64-bit ubuntu.
John
On 8 June 2010 03:50, leif wrote:
> Ubuntu 9.04 x86 (Pentium4 Prescott, gcc 4.3.3):
>
> make build: OK
> make doc: OK
> make ptestlong: OK (All tests passed.)
>
> (Built with CFLAGS="-march=native -fno-strict-alia
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:12:55PM -0700, Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On Jun 7, 2010, at 06:12 , Florent Hivert wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I've question concerning handling of hash value vs portability. Is sage
>> developer guide manual one can read:
>>
>>Here is the definition of __has
On 6/7/10 4:47 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:23 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
Well, there's a technical and legal question here. On a technical note,
it's
better to put the C files in an spkg and then link to them from the Sag
30 matches
Mail list logo
