Craig Citro wrote:
Thank you for the very long email.
I got an email off-list from someone else, which I believe rather put
your email into perspective.
I'm really sorry if anything in my email was offensive -- I knew the
thread was already fairly heated, and definitely didn't want to add to
I got another complaint about the patch, so I made a new one. Go to
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8222#comment:7 and try the
new patch.
Btw, great work on the triangulation editor, I just tied it on your
server. I don't know anything about FEM to comment on that, but happy
the graph_ed
>
>
> How did you implement the Triangulation class, so that you can just
> use it in Sage? Did you just add it to the Sage library? Or installed
> it as some extra package (in this case, how exactly did you install
> it)?
>
> I usually just install packages as spkg, which means that I have to
> cr
On Mar 26, 12:42 pm, Gokhan Sever wrote:
> On Mar 26, 11:07 am, William Stein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > I just tried PyGSL -- I downloaded the tarball, change into the
> > pygsl-0.9.5 directory, and typed
>
> > sage -python setup.py
>
> > Unfortunately, the build fails for me under OS X and Ubuntu
Starting eclipse form a sage shell or modifing the LD_LIBRARY_PATH
provides works; however, I get a new but non critical warning in the
eclipse console.
Thanks
/work/usr/local/src/sage-4.3.4/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pytz/
__init__.py:29: UserWarning: Module pytz was already imported from
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote:
>> > I've noticed that the graph editor is viewable in published worksheets.
>> > Should this behaviour be disabled?
>>
>> Why?
> It's confusing. It looks like you can edit the page while you really
> can't. It'd better if the javascript were d
Hi Pablo!
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote:
> 1) I have updated the content at
>
> http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/pangulo/etc/te.zip
>
> with some corrections. It is still not recommended for installation,
> just for reading.
>
> 2) I have left a server in the machine:
> > I've noticed that the graph editor is viewable in published worksheets.
> > Should this behaviour be disabled?
>
> Why?
It's confusing. It looks like you can edit the page while you really
can't. It'd better if the javascript were disabled. But wait, interacts
are also alive on published works
On Mar 26, 3:10 pm, Scott wrote:
> Which paths need to be specified ...
I think something you should try is to start eclipse from inside the
sage environment:
1. ./sage -sh
2. start eclipse. then the paths are completely different and it might
work.
If you get it running, could you please write
On Mar 26, 11:07 am, William Stein wrote:
>
> I just tried PyGSL -- I downloaded the tarball, change into the
> pygsl-0.9.5 directory, and typed
>
> sage -python setup.py
>
> Unfortunately, the build fails for me under OS X and Ubuntu 8.10 Linux
> with Sage-4.3.4:
>
> In file included from tes
> Thank you for the very long email.
>
> I got an email off-list from someone else, which I believe rather put
> your email into perspective.
>
I'm really sorry if anything in my email was offensive -- I knew the
thread was already fairly heated, and definitely didn't want to add to
that. (And I s
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Pablo Angulo wrote:
> I've noticed that the graph editor is viewable in published worksheets.
> Should this behaviour be disabled?
Why?
William
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
I've noticed that the graph editor is viewable in published worksheets.
Should this behaviour be disabled?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this
1) I have updated the content at
http://www.uam.es/personal_pdi/ciencias/pangulo/etc/te.zip
with some corrections. It is still not recommended for installation,
just for reading.
2) I have left a server in the machine:
https://lavadora.mat.uam.es:8000/home/pub/1/
where you can browse the trian
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 8:35 AM, Gokhan Sever wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 30, 2:11 am, Gokhan Sever wrote:
>> On Jan 23, 3:04 pm, gsever wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>>
>> > Is there any plan to add some other distributions mentioned in:
>>
>> >http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/21efb0b3fc47/sage/gsl/probab
On Jan 30, 2:11 am, Gokhan Sever wrote:
> On Jan 23, 3:04 pm, gsever wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > Is there any plan to add some other distributions mentioned in:
>
> >http://hg.sagemath.org/sage-main/file/21efb0b3fc47/sage/gsl/probabili...
>
> > 50 #TODO: Add more distributions available in gsl
>
On Friday 26 March 2010, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Craig Citro wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > As one of the people William mentioned who'd complained about the
> > volume of Solaris email on sage-devel, I thought I should weigh in.
>
> Thank you for the very long email.
>
> I got an email off-list
Craig Citro wrote:
Hi David,
As one of the people William mentioned who'd complained about the
volume of Solaris email on sage-devel, I thought I should weigh in.
Thank you for the very long email.
I got an email off-list from someone else, which I believe rather things put
your email into
Which paths need to be specified in eclipse+pydev when using sage-
python as the interpreter?
eclipse+pydev finds sage-python and the python libs but not the
shared objects in numpy (liblappack.so and such).
V/R
Scott
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On 03/26/2010 06:10 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
(my favorite cached function), one still gets beside the doc of
super_categories, a lot of irrelevant documentation about
cached_functions, which is confusing. Ideally,
functools.update_wrapper would handle this; there was a discussion on
trac abou
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 09:01:35AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
> >> MORAL: If you care about speed, don't use the cached_method decorator
> >> yet. It entails massive overheard.
>
> I'm very sorry to says that Nicolas and I are well aware of this problem since
> a long time. We have been cursing
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:08:30 -0700 (PDT)
G B wrote:
> I don't seem able to edit my previous message to add this information,
> but the GiNaC team seems to have picked up the bug report and patched
> it:
> http://www.cebix.net/pipermail/ginac-devel/2010-March/001724.html
Great! Thanks for followi
Hi Willian, hi Jason
> On 03/25/2010 08:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> I was trying to understand why certain modular symbols code was too
>> slow, and ran across a method that looked like this (in
>> modular/modsym/element.py):
>>
[...]
>>
>> Of course, on multiple calls, the above is slow
23 matches
Mail list logo
