[sage-devel] Re: Mathematica doctest

2010-03-09 Thread Felix Lawrence
Hi David, I haven't looked into these since #3587 rewrote MathematicaElement._sage_() for mathematica objects, but I did a bit of work getting the generic ExpectElement._sage_() to work with mathematica lists. Mathematica does return different results depending on whether it's running in 32-bit o

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-Combinat/Chevie meeting on Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras in Orsay in June

2010-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:31:30PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > Dear Sage-Combinat and Chevie developers, > > To build on the good work from Sage days 20, and make the best use of > Andrew Mathas's visit next June, I'd like to organize a focused > Sage-Combinat/Chevie workshop on Coxete

[sage-devel] Sage-Combinat/Chevie meeting on Coxeter groups and Hecke algebras in Orsay in June

2010-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Sage-Combinat and Chevie developers, To build on the good work from Sage days 20, and make the best use of Andrew Mathas's visit next June, I'd like to organize a focused Sage-Combinat/Chevie workshop on Coxeter groups, Hecke algebras, and related topics. If you are interested in att

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Documentation (was: Lie Methods and Related Combinatorics)

2010-03-09 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Jason, On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Jason Bandlow wrote: > 1) Remove the 'subtopics' from the current index. I.e., when opening > the reference manual, one would just see links: > > * The Sage Command Line > * The Sage Notebook > * Symbolic Calculus > ... > > Ideally, these would be so

Re: [sage-devel] Re: plot, plot3d and _latex_ consistency (graphs and others)

2010-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:18:57PM -0800, Vincent D wrote: > > I've looked at #7004.  There are parts I could safely review, but > > other parts I don't feel comfortable with.  Any chance it could be > > chunked up into a few coherent parts that might be easier to review? > > Thanks for your inter

Re: [sage-devel] Re: SAGE in abstract algebra class

2010-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Hi! First a quick note: all work on groups and integration with gap (especially libgap) will be very much appreciated! On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 08:43:25PM -0800, Rob Beezer wrote: > An implementation of finite abelian groups would be at the top of my > list. Folklore has it many have trie

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Documentation (was: Lie Methods and Related Combinatorics)

2010-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:58:53AM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote: > I've changed the topic, since the thread no longer has anything to do > with Lie theory or Combinatorics and I'd like to hear what other people > have to say about the documentation issues raised here. Thanks! > Nicolas M. Thiery wr

Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Fwd: [sage-devel] GSOC 2010 proposal

2010-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
Dear Carlos, On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 07:05:20AM +0100, Vincent Delecroix wrote: > I just answer few words about Automata. We talked with Jean Berstel > about it during Sage days 20 and he said that there was a lot of > software available around the world for dealing with them. The most > g

[sage-devel] Sage 4.3.4.alpha1 released!

2010-03-09 Thread Mike Hansen
Hello all, This release should fix many of the outstanding issues on Solaris as well as some more of the combinatorics code from Sage Days 20. Source tarball: http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/sage-4.3.4.alpha1/sage-4.3.4.alpha1.tar Binary for sage.math: http://sage.math.washington.

[sage-devel] tutorial: using @interact in the Sage library (or any Python library code).

2010-03-09 Thread William Stein
Hi, I was playing around with using @interact in the Sage library and it almost works... and with one small hack it seems to work fine. You just have to know how to use it. As an example, put the following (see below) in a file such as SAGE_ROOT/devel/sage/sage/a.py, then do "sage -br" and fina

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is there going to be a sage-4.4 stabilisation release ?

2010-03-09 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > Jason Grout wrote: >> >> On 03/08/2010 12:26 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: >> >>> If you want a stabilization release, volunteer to be a release manager >>> (perhaps partnering with someone else) and only merge "safe" bug fixes. >>> I don't t

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is there going to be a sage-4.4 stabilisation release ?

2010-03-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jason Grout wrote: On 03/08/2010 12:26 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: If you want a stabilization release, volunteer to be a release manager (perhaps partnering with someone else) and only merge "safe" bug fixes. I don't thing anyone would complain, as long as the release cycle wasn't too long so t

Re: [sage-devel] portable libm

2010-03-09 Thread Mike Hansen
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Jason Grout wrote: > Has anyone looked at http://lipforge.ens-lyon.fr/www/crlibm/index.html? That only provides double precision versions and is missing things like C99 complex support. For Cygwin, I've been playing around the packages at http://www.netlib.org/cep

Re: [sage-devel] Sage Documentation (was: Lie Methods and Related Combinatorics)

2010-03-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Jason Bandlow wrote: By the way, Jason: can you remind me what's the difference between 'primer' and 'tutorial'? * primer --- a mini tutorial that should get you started, up and running in a few minutes. * tutorial --- requires about half an hour (or more) to work through. Agreed. Cheers, J

[sage-devel] Re: Graph classes, ISGCI, and interesting improvements ...

2010-03-09 Thread Jason Grout
On 03/08/2010 02:24 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote: Hello everybody !!! This is the copy of several mails concerning ISGCI and what we could do with it in Sage. ISGCI (Information System on Graph Class Inclusions) can be seen ass a Java software, a Website, or an amazing database of graph classes. It c

[sage-devel] Re: Vote on bugs to be fixed for sage-4.4 "stabilization release".

2010-03-09 Thread Jason Grout
On 03/08/2010 12:05 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: On Mar 7, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Florent Hivert wrote: Hi there, Note that I've no idea how hard it is to implement in trac, neither if we have the necessary hardware to support this load. From reading the Sage merge script, I think one could use t

[sage-devel] Re: Is there going to be a sage-4.4 stabilisation release ?

2010-03-09 Thread Jason Grout
On 03/08/2010 12:26 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote: If you want a stabilization release, volunteer to be a release manager (perhaps partnering with someone else) and only merge "safe" bug fixes. I don't thing anyone would complain, as long as the release cycle wasn't too long so that people knew thei

[sage-devel] Sage Documentation (was: Lie Methods and Related Combinatorics)

2010-03-09 Thread Jason Bandlow
Hi all, I've changed the topic, since the thread no longer has anything to do with Lie theory or Combinatorics and I'd like to hear what other people have to say about the documentation issues raised here. Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:57:31AM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote: >>>

[sage-devel] portable libm

2010-03-09 Thread Jason Grout
On the GSOC page, there is this item: Sage relies on a fairly complete C99 libm. In particular, it expects the "long double" and "complex" variants of most functions to be present. Not all these functions are present on Cygwin, FreeBSD or older Solaris, causing porting problems on those plat

Re: [sage-devel] Re: Is there going to be a sage-4.4 stabilisation release ?

2010-03-09 Thread John Cremona
On 9 March 2010 16:23, Simon King wrote: > Hi! > > On 9 Mrz., 15:37, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > [...] >> I don't know if there is a way of searching in 'trac' for tickets that >> >> * Need review >> * Are just bug fixes > > Probably there isn't, yet. But I think one may consider to introduce a >

Re: [sage-devel] Mathematica doctest

2010-03-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Nick Alexander wrote: On 8-Mar-10, at 6:03 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote: I'm a bit puzzled by this one: sage: def math_bessel_K(nu,x): ... return mathematica(nu).BesselK(x).N(20).sage() ... sage: math_bessel_K(2,I) # optional - mathematica 0.180489972

[sage-devel] Re: Is there going to be a sage-4.4 stabilisation release ?

2010-03-09 Thread Simon King
Hi! On 9 Mrz., 15:37, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: [...] > I don't know if there is a way of searching in 'trac' for tickets that > > * Need review > * Are just bug fixes Probably there isn't, yet. But I think one may consider to introduce a new label (in addition to "needs review", "needs work" an

Re: [sage-devel] Is there going to be a sage-4.4 stabilisation release ?

2010-03-09 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Nick Alexander wrote: Okay, then you tell people that their hard work will not be packaged in the next iteration. Maybe that's life, but it will certainly discourage me from contributing when I'm told in advance that my changes will not be

[sage-devel] Re: Groups in Sage, libgap

2010-03-09 Thread Dima Pasechnik
PS. Also, please advertise this project on gap-forum and gap-support mailing lists. I am sure there will be more people interested in helping out if you explain that potentially one would be able to seamlessly call GAP functions from Python... Dima On Mar 9, 7:58 am, Mike OS wrote: > I have som

[sage-devel] Re: Groups in Sage, libgap

2010-03-09 Thread Dima Pasechnik
Mike, if you need something specific for your goals implemented on GAP side, please email gap-support and/or me. Few further remarks: I also noticed and reported here a while ago that Sage's functionality for matrix group is not quite consistent with this functionality for permutation groups (pro

Re: [sage-devel] Raw string in notebook

2010-03-09 Thread Pat LeSmithe
On 03/09/2010 12:24 AM, Kwankyu Lee wrote: > But in the notebook of Sage 4.3.3, the same input produces > > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "", line 1, in > File "_sage_input_37.py", line 9, in > open("___code___.py","w").write("# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-\n" + > _support_.preparse

[sage-devel] Re: [sage-combinat-devel] Re: Lie Methods and Related Combinatorics

2010-03-09 Thread Nicolas M. Thiery
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:57:31AM +1100, Minh Nguyen wrote: > > To summarize, and as was previously vaguely discussed on > > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel/msg/18c3926662cf5033, > > we would love to aim progressively at: > > > >sage: sage? # quickref

[sage-devel] Raw string in notebook

2010-03-09 Thread Kwankyu Lee
Hi, There is no problem on the command line: sage: r"\use" '\\use' But in the notebook of Sage 4.3.3, the same input produces Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "_sage_input_37.py", line 9, in open("___code___.py","w").write("# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-\n" + _supp