Hello,
Clicking on the left of a cell in the notebook used to cycle wrapped-
unwrapped-hidden output for text and typeset-LaTeX code-hidden for
typeset output. After upgrade to 4.3.3 in the second case I get
typeset-typeset-hidden cycle. Is it a bug or a design decision? I
personally liked this wa
I sort of know the lead developer since he is my professor.
LOOK ITS A SIGNATURE CLICK IF YOU DARE---
http://www.google.com/profiles/zitterbewegung
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Joshua Herman
> wrote:
>> Link to http://www.math
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:13 PM, Joshua Herman wrote:
> Link to http://www.math.uic.edu/~jan/download.html
>
> On Feb 24, 2010 11:12 PM, "Joshua Herman" wrote:
>
> Are you guys interested in adapting phcpack for sage? Its a solver for
> polynominal homotopy?
phcpack is already an optional packag
On 02/24/2010 08:38 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
> When I run doctests on the file ell_rational_field.py, I end up with a
> small file called PRIMES in the current directory. This shouldn't
> happen: running doctests shouldn't produce files in a non-temporary
> directory. However, I can't figure out
Link to http://www.math.uic.edu/~jan/download.html
On Feb 24, 2010 11:12 PM, "Joshua Herman" wrote:
Are you guys interested in adapting phcpack for sage? Its a solver for
polynominal homotopy?
>
> On Feb 24, 2010 5:51 PM, "Nils Bruin" wrote:
>
> On Feb 24, 2:48 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Wh
Are you guys interested in adapting phcpack for sage? Its a solver for
polynominal homotopy?
On Feb 24, 2010 5:51 PM, "Nils Bruin" wrote:
On Feb 24, 2:48 pm, William Stein wrote:
> What happened last year, by the way, w...
I will be supervising a 3rd year mathematics/computer science student
th
When I run doctests on the file ell_rational_field.py, I end up with a
small file called PRIMES in the current directory. This shouldn't
happen: running doctests shouldn't produce files in a non-temporary
directory. However, I can't figure out how this file gets there. In
particular, if I delete
On Feb 24, 11:45 am, Martin Rubey
wrote:
> At least from one point of view it makes sense to make such a choice:
> when you do, the incidence matrix times it's transpose gives you the
> Laplace matrix of the graph.
That's a good point.
> Thus if you indeed change this behaviour, it may make sens
When the python 2.6.4 package builds, it gives this warning.
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --without-libpng
It was exactly the same with R recently - old options, which no longer work,
were left there.
Everyone has only a finite amount of time, so it is understandable if people do
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Craig Jones wrote:
I downloaded the source code for sage-4.3.2 (I tried sage 4.3.3 as
well and had the same issue). The make goes a long way through and
then has an issue:
mv: cannot create regular file `all.R': Permission denied
I am building
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
If the python web site is to be believed, there is a patch which will
resolve the issue with the Sage library not building properly on
4.3.3. i.e. it should hopefully solve
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7867
which is the most seriou
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Craig Jones wrote:
I downloaded the source code for sage-4.3.2 (I tried sage 4.3.3 as
well and had the same issue). The make goes a long way through and
then has an issue:
mv: cannot create regular file `all.R': Permission denied
I am building this on a linux box in my
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
If the python web site is to be believed, there is a patch which will
resolve the issue with the Sage library not building properly on 4.3.3.
i.e. it should hopefully solve
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7867
which is the most serious Solaris specific bug.
Craig Jones wrote:
I downloaded the source code for sage-4.3.2 (I tried sage 4.3.3 as
well and had the same issue). The make goes a long way through and
then has an issue:
mv: cannot create regular file `all.R': Permission denied
I am building this on a linux box in my own directory. The box
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_SOURCE
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
wh
I downloaded the source code for sage-4.3.2 (I tried sage 4.3.3 as
well and had the same issue). The make goes a long way through and
then has an issue:
mv: cannot create regular file `all.R': Permission denied
I am building this on a linux box in my own directory. The box is
RedHat Enterprise
If the python web site is to be believed, there is a patch which will resolve
the issue with the Sage library not building properly on 4.3.3. i.e. it should
hopefully solve
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7867
which is the most serious Solaris specific bug.
I've created a tar file
Slow response, but here it is.
I'm working on the school computing cluster. It runs Rocks 5.1 (V.I),
which I believe is a RedHat derivative (/bin/rpm exists, for one...).
Here is the GCC version.
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/u
On Feb 24, 2:48 pm, William Stein wrote:
> What happened last year, by the way, was that several people wanted to
> write a GSOC application. However, nobody volunteered to mentor any
> Sage-related GSOC projects at all. As a result, we did not even apply
> to have Sage as a mentoring organizati
William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Arthur Gaer wrote:
William,
Curt was just asking me about Vpython cause I gather some of his undergrads
showed him some cool mathematical graphics utilizing it. He thinks they
might use it in a CS course or two here.
What's the deal with
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Arthur Gaer wrote:
> William,
>
> Curt was just asking me about Vpython cause I gather some of his undergrads
> showed him some cool mathematical graphics utilizing it. He thinks they
> might use it in a CS course or two here.
>
> What's the deal with Vpython? It
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_SOURCE
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
wh
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> On Feb 24, 12:01 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> Yes! But we should start organizing early this year.
>
> And since sage wasn't accepted 3 times in a row (afaik) we should be
> careful what we request. I think we have to drop all math-related
>
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_SOURCE
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
whe
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Jaap Spies wrote:
> There seems to be a lot of issues with _XOPEN_SOURCE and Solaris, see:
>
> http://bugs.python.org/issue1759169
>From this discussion, it seems that we should strip out
_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED
_XOPEN_SOURCE
_POSIX_C_SOURCE
when building Python
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Robert Miller wrote:
David,
I don't know how important #6583 it so Sage, or how important William
sees a Solaris port as important, but at the minute, these two
appear to be
mutually exclusive.
I don't know if I agree with that. Have you tried tinkering with the
build
Robert Miller wrote:
David,
I don't know how important #6583 it so Sage, or how important William
sees a Solaris port as important, but at the minute, these two appear to be
mutually exclusive.
I don't know if I agree with that. Have you tried tinkering with the
build flags on t2? We had seve
There are two tickets for making changes to 'twisted'
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7552
is an update to the latest twisted release.
Nobody has committed to giving that a positive review yet.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8352
is a small update to twist - basically rem
Hi all
On Feb 24, 2:24 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby"
wrote:
> Oscar Lazo wrote:
>
> > On 23 feb, 10:39, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> >> If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the opportunity for
> >> someone to publish worksheets, there is a section:
>
> >> "Browse published Sage workshee
On 2010-Feb-24 05:06:00 -0800, Harald Schilly wrote:
>On Feb 24, 12:01 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>> Yes! But we should start organizing early this year.
>
>And since sage wasn't accepted 3 times in a row (afaik) we should be
>careful what we request. I think we have to drop all math-related
>tasks
Rob Beezer writes:
> I would definitely expect the entries of an undirected graph to just
> be 0 and +1 for an incidence matrix.
>
> Doc string says:
>
> Returns an incidence matrix of the (di)graph. Each row is a vertex,
> and each column is an edge. Note that in the case of graphs, there
> is a
As a follow-up, Bondy and Murty in "Graph Theory with
Applications" [1] define the incidence matrix with entries 0, 1 and 2,
being "the number of times" vertex v_i and edge e_j are incident.
This will keep the sum of all the rows as twice the all-ones vector.
It doesn't seem to me that loops are be
I would definitely expect the entries of an undirected graph to just
be 0 and +1 for an incidence matrix.
Doc string says:
Returns an incidence matrix of the (di)graph. Each row is a vertex,
and each column is an edge. Note that in the case of graphs, there
is a choice of orientation for each edg
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Oscar Lazo wrote:
>>
>> On 23 feb, 10:39, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>>>
>>> If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the opportunity for
>>> someone to publish worksheets, there is a section:
>>>
>>> "Browse published Sage wo
On Feb 23, 10:55 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> We should also include a TikZ-exported graph. I don't know of any other
> major math software systems that export graphics in TikZ format, and the
> output looks lovely. It should definitely get on a calendar!
+1. Maybe I should get back to making the expo
Hi folks,
I believe the following is a bug in the implementation of
incidence_matrix() in the module sage/graphs/generic_graph.py. Say I
define an undirected graph as follows:
[mv...@sage sage-4.3.3]$ ./sage
--
| Sage Version 4.3
David,
>>> I don't know how important #6583 it so Sage, or how important William
>>> sees a Solaris port as important, but at the minute, these two appear to be
>>> mutually exclusive.
I don't know if I agree with that. Have you tried tinkering with the
build flags on t2? We had several different
This is now ticket 8349.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Hi Joshua,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 3:01 AM, Joshua Herman wrote:
> I meant by a mobile edition
> 1. Make a mobile version of the notebook interface (Able to be used by
> a mobile browser)
See http://math1.skku.ac.kr/wap_html
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email
Also looking at that website a Wave robot would be fun to to also. I
would need help with writing the application document
https://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0AWHfMu95Txe_ZHRrNmNjY181MDFkZzVxNXBkMg&hl=en
LOOK ITS A SIGNATURE CLICK IF YOU DARE---
http://www.google.com/profiles/zitterbewegung
I meant by a mobile edition
1. Make a mobile version of the notebook interface (Able to be used by
a mobile browser)
2. Get it to compile on arm and work on an android (If I have time)
LOOK ITS A SIGNATURE CLICK IF YOU DARE---
http://www.google.com/profiles/zitterbewegung
On Wed, Feb 2
Take a look at this
http://t2nb.math.washington.edu:8000/home/pub/7/
which I took from an example here
http://www.sagemath.org/tour-quickstart.html
If the view you get is anything like what my browser shows (I could attach a
screen shot later if others browsers see it differently), then the
Oscar Lazo wrote:
On 23 feb, 10:39, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the opportunity for
someone to publish worksheets, there is a section:
"Browse published Sage worksheets
(no login required)"
But often those worksheets are bad examples, error
On Feb 24, 12:01 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Yes! But we should start organizing early this year.
And since sage wasn't accepted 3 times in a row (afaik) we should be
careful what we request. I think we have to drop all math-related
tasks. Just focus on things like "management", "server-
infrastru
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Håkan Granath wrote:
> Typesetting conjugates of variables (that has been passed to
> Maxima and back?) is strange. In e.g. Sage 4.2 this did not
> happen.
>
> --
> | Sage Version 4.
Hi Joshua,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 23:41:12 -0600
Joshua Herman wrote:
> Is sage doing GSOC?
Yes! But we should start organizing early this year.
Last year we started the planning too late and didn't manage to arrange
a proper list of tasks and mentors in time for the application. Things
have impr
On 24 February 2010 09:27, David Roe wrote:
> Go for it. Note that 8335 changes squarefree_decomposition (adding code for
> characteristic p; there are no material changes to the characteristic 0
> code. But there will be a merge conflict with any change you make.
> David
>
I'm excited about 83
Go for it. Note that 8335 changes squarefree_decomposition (adding code for
characteristic p; there are no material changes to the characteristic 0
code. But there will be a merge conflict with any change you make.
David
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:13 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> it's an easy to
On 24 February 2010 07:13, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> it's an easy to fix bug in squarefree_decomposition in sage/rings/
> polynomial/polynomial_element.pyx, line 1142
> I can fix it if there are no takers...
>
Please do. and while you are there, could you address the related
problem suggested by y
...and then we would want some way of testing that all the "good"
worksheets all still work with each new release?
John
On 24 February 2010 01:54, Oscar Lazo wrote:
>
>
> On 23 feb, 10:39, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>> If one sets up a Sage server for public use, there is the opportunity for
>>
On Feb 24, 12:47 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Can we put the md5 sums on the metalinks page [1]...
Uhm, not necessary, just like Dan said. You can look into the
metalinks file, it's just xml. There you will find many hashsums.
"aria2c -V" validates a file and downloads broken parts.
H
--
To post t
51 matches
Mail list logo
