>From what I've heard,
The available open-source packages that could form a basis for tensor
calculus and Differential geometry in Sage are:
Axiom (FriCAS, OpenAxiom)
Reduce (used alot by physicists, and has some specialized toolboxes
that could serve the purpose)
Cadabra
This would be a good a
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:27 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> On 02/12/2010 06:32 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Lately it seems like Sage has gotten more bugs rather than less. I
>> think it's time for a stabilization release -- say Sage-4.4 -- that
>> fixes the absolutely most annoying of t
On 02/12/2010 06:32 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Lately it seems like Sage has gotten more bugs rather than less.I
think it's time for a stabilization release -- say Sage-4.4 -- that
fixes the absolutely most annoying of these bugs.
Just curious---do you see this as the next release, bui
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Lately it seems like Sage has gotten more bugs rather than less.I
think it's time for a stabilization release -- say Sage-4.4 -- that
fixes the absolutely most annoying of these bugs.
I think your idea is excellent.
What are *your* top 4 bugs that are in sage-4.3
Hi,
Lately it seems like Sage has gotten more bugs rather than less.I
think it's time for a stabilization release -- say Sage-4.4 -- that
fixes the absolutely most annoying of these bugs.
What are *your* top 4 bugs that are in sage-4.3.2 that you really wish
were fixed?? If you care, respon
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm in Kaiserslautern, at a workshop on connecting mathematical
> software for polyhedral geometry with software packages for Gröbner
> basis (polymake, gfan, singular).
>
> I tried to code a small example demonstrating how to call Sa
All tests passed on an intel mac running 10.6.2.
-Marshall
On Feb 12, 7:59 am, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi kcrisman,
>
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>
> > Will it also always have upgrade and
> > sage.math binary paths?
>
> I think so. Release managers would deposit alpha
Option 2: the goal is to eventually eliminate ParentWithGens and
ParentWithBase, and rewrite all classes in Sage that use their functionality
to instead use the functions defined by sage.structure.parent.Parent and
sage.structure.category_object.CategoryObject.
This transition will take quite a bi
Hello,
I have started writing a class for Fano toric varieties, and as I
understand it should inherit from AmbientSpace. Going further,
AmbientSpace derives from ParentWithGens and in the beginning of the
corresponding file we see
.. note::
This class is being deprecated, see
``sage.struct
On Feb 12, 11:38 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> Hi, I got this from the "report a problem" report link.
>
> I confirmed this with 4.3.2, I think this would at also make a nice
> doctest if it is already known...
>
> reset(); forget(); n=var('n'); assume(n>0); bool(n>0)
> => True
>
> After that, typ
and a bit more on that:
I compute some E.sha().an() in a family,
and get a wrong output when the rank of the curve is 2.
For instance,
t=43,
(1, 2, '11825l2', 1.00), no problem here
(1, 2, '11825l1', 5.00)), 5.000 is supposed to be the
order of the Tate-Sha of the curve 11
Hi, I got this from the "report a problem" report link.
I confirmed this with 4.3.2, I think this would at also make a nice
doctest if it is already known...
reset(); forget(); n=var('n'); assume(n>0); bool(n>0)
=> True
After that, type:
reset(); n=var('n'); assume(n>0); bool(n>0)
=> False
E
Hi, I got this problem reported via the "report a problem" link. I
don't know how valid it is, but at least there is some confusion about
it.
Sage Version 4.3.2,
Description:
I compute E.sha().an() in a series of parametrized computations.
I get strange results when the curve has rank 2:
t=-25,
Hi kcrisman,
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Will it also always have upgrade and
> sage.math binary paths?
I think so. Release managers would deposit alpha and rc releases
there, including sage.math binaries and upgrade paths.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to
> William recently created a directory called "release/" for depositing
> alpha and rc releases. From now on, you can get the latest alpha/rc
> releases from any of these URLs:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/release/http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/release/
>
This is a great idea.
Hi folks,
Pat volunteered to put together Sage 4.3.3.alpha0. Unfortunately, Pat
is feeling unwell at the moment, so I'm announcing this alpha release.
I'll be also taking over managing the release of Sage 4.3.3.alpha1.
William recently created a directory called "release/" for depositing
alpha and
Bill Hart wrote:
You can't get around requiring LD_LIBRARY_PATH to be set on Solaris
Sparc. similarly for LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64. The libgcc is required by
some binaries gcc generates, and your linker has to be able to find
it. After all, you could have put it anywhere and the linker doesn't
have any
I just opened the file include/NTL/config.h in the Sage 4.3.2 tarball
and it contains the lines:
#if 1
#define NTL_STD_CXX
This is perfectly valid C++. So it looks like you have some file
corruption.
The C++ code you posted is not valid.
C++ programmers frequently use #if 1 to specifically incl
François Bissey wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:00:02 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
François Bissey wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:29:22 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I've tried to build sage-4.3.2 on Solaris 10 using gcc 4.4.3 (the latest
version). It is complaining about some code in NTL, specicially the u
You can't get around requiring LD_LIBRARY_PATH to be set on Solaris
Sparc. similarly for LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64. The libgcc is required by
some binaries gcc generates, and your linker has to be able to find
it. After all, you could have put it anywhere and the linker doesn't
have any guidelines on wher
Hi David,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> There is another one, which can be found on all the mirrors
I created the said binary at Alex's request, as can be found in a
recent thread on sage-release [1].
> If you want, and with Williams permission, I'll create you
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
I have built Sage 4.3.0.1 on t2.math. The binary tarball can be found at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/t2.math-bin/sage-4.3.0.1.tar.gz
There is another one, which can be found on all the mirrors - e.g.
http://modular.math.jmu.edu/solaris/index.html
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 22:00:02 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> François Bissey wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:29:22 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> >> I've tried to build sage-4.3.2 on Solaris 10 using gcc 4.4.3 (the latest
> >> version). It is complaining about some code in NTL, specicially the use
> >> of '
On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:50 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I agree in this case, something went wrong, but on other occasions,
I've seen this problem without lots of modules failing. Here is one
section of a previous build failure on SPARC:
Failed to find the necessary bits to build these mod
François Bissey wrote:
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:29:22 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I've tried to build sage-4.3.2 on Solaris 10 using gcc 4.4.3 (the latest
version). It is complaining about some code in NTL, specicially the use of
'if' and 'define' include/NTL/config.h.
I'm not a C++ programmer. It i
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Feb 11, 2010, at 6:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
To see what would happen, I went and grabbed the OpenSolaris image at
http://virtualbox.wordpress.com/images/opensolaris/ , installed gcc,
moved the openssl directory out of /usr/include, and b
Done !
But I have absolutely no idea how to deal with such a ticket... I only
know how to create patches ;-)
Nathann
On 12 February 2010 09:37, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Nathann,
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Nathann Cohen
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> Besides, everything that is
>> inside is also
Hi Nathann,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:34 PM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
> Besides, everything that is
> inside is also in glpk 4.38, so we should be fine removing it :-)
Could you please open a ticket for this?
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@goo
Hello !!!
Well, I definitely remember having sent the same kind of post to this
mailing list or on IRC, where it was acknowledged that no one really
knew who first created this GLPK package. Besides, everything that is
inside is also in glpk 4.38, so we should be fine removing it :-)
Nathann
--
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:29:22 Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I've tried to build sage-4.3.2 on Solaris 10 using gcc 4.4.3 (the latest
> version). It is complaining about some code in NTL, specicially the use of
> 'if' and 'define' include/NTL/config.h.
>
> I'm not a C++ programmer. It is normal to put
30 matches
Mail list logo
