I am using the following function from Tomas Oliveira e Silva
(converted by myself into Python). See
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8135
from math import log
#
# computation of li(x^{1/2+I t})+li(x^{1/2-I t})
#
# li(x^\rho) = x^\rho/u*(1+1/u+2!/u^2+3!/u^3+...),
# with \rho=1/2+it and
I have forgotten to note these are same errors I got from the
v4.3.1.alpha0 as I reported at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7773
On Feb 5, 6:59 pm, Gokhan Sever wrote:
> After make test:
>
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t "devel/sage/sage/modules/free_module.py" # Seg
Yep, we missed it. Thanks.
This is actually caused by Sage not using MPIR 1.4.0. (or possibly
1.3.2 if we decide to issue a service release to fix this particular
problem). OP is running now anyhow. See MPIR ticket #282.
Bill.
On Feb 5, 10:11 pm, mhampton wrote:
> I'm just bumping this up becau
I contacted the mpir mailing-list and Bill Hart in private. We have
work around for the compilation. I believe they will add a fix in the
next release of mpir.
On Feb 5, 5:11 pm, mhampton wrote:
> I'm just bumping this up because I think the people who can figure it
> out might have missed it.
>
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 at 09:07AM -0800, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> We should find a better solution --- a server option, perhaps?
> Unfortunately, I don't know the status of the notebook i18n and L10n
> efforts.
I was working a bit on this, but ran into a problem with the notebook
not using Unicode inter
Hi folks,
A recent news item: Mozilla announces that it would end support for
Firefox on Mac OS X 10.4 some time in 2011. See the following URL for
more details:
http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2010/020510-mozilla-ends-firefox-support-for.html
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--
To post to this grou
After make test:
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/modules/free_module.py" # Segfault
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/coding/code_constructions.py" # Segfault
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/coding/linear_code.py" # Segfault
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/group
I'm just bumping this up because I think the people who can figure it
out might have missed it.
-M. Hampton
On Feb 3, 6:53 pm, asd1815 wrote:
> I just tried to compile from source to get a 32-bit version running on
> my laptop.
>
> I have:
>
> $gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: i686-apple
On Feb 5, 3:29 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Gokhan Sever wrote:
>
> > On Jan 24, 10:59 am, gsever wrote:
> >> Hello,
>
> >> Am I getting the similar error of FC12 (i686) binaries not pushed in
> >> the download section?
>
> >> [gse...@ccn sage-4.3.1]$ uname -a
> >> Linux ccn 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.P
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
There used to be a lot file created automatically, called test.log.
I don't know what has happened to it.
"sage -t " never ever creates a log file and never has.
"make test" and "make testlong" always creates a logfile.
Gokhan Sever wrote:
On Jan 24, 10:59 am, gsever wrote:
Hello,
Am I getting the similar error of FC12 (i686) binaries not pushed in
the download section?
[gse...@ccn sage-4.3.1]$ uname -a
Linux ccn 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 06:04:56 UTC
2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[gse.
On Jan 24, 10:59 am, gsever wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Am I getting the similar error of FC12 (i686) binaries not pushed in
> the download section?
>
> [gse...@ccn sage-4.3.1]$ uname -a
> Linux ccn 2.6.31.9-174.fc12.i686.PAE #1 SMP Mon Dec 21 06:04:56 UTC
> 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
>
> [gse...@ccn
>> I did not know that was potentially expensive. If so, let the code be
>> as it is -- but then whenever a function has a "check-False" option
>> the exact correct input should be documented. Which it is NOT at
>
> Yes, I strongly agree with this. Please open a trac ticket. We can
> even inclu
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
If I run
./sage -t devel
where is the log file kept? In particular, where is it kept if you use a
global install of Sage, and so don't have write access to any
directories under $SAGE_ROOT?
just do ./sage -t devel 2>&1 | tee /tmp/testdevel.log
or so.
Jaap
I seem
Hi all,
Version 0.14 of mpmath is now available on the website:
http://code.google.com/p/mpmath/
It can also be downloaded from the Python Package Index:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mpmath/0.14
Mpmath is a pure-Python library for arbitrary-precision floating-point
arithmetic that implements an e
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 10:51 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Nils Bruin wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 5, 8:24 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>>>
>>> If I run
>>>
>>> ./sage -t devel
>>>
>>> where is the log file kept? In particular, where is it kept if you use a
>>> global
>>> install of Sage, and so don't ha
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 11:45 AM, YannLC wrote:
> Is this sandpile stuff going to be in Sage somehow? It might be worth
> asking the author.
>
> http://people.reed.edu/~davidp/sand/sage/sage.html
Here's the ticket: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7453
--Mike
--
To post to this group,
Is this sandpile stuff going to be in Sage somehow? It might be worth
asking the author.
http://people.reed.edu/~davidp/sand/sage/sage.html
On Feb 5, 7:44 pm, David Joyner wrote:
> Interesting. Thanks for this link Harald.
>
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Harald Schilly
>
> wrote:
> > Life'
Harald Schilly wrote:
On Feb 5, 6:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
This should be put on the experimental page (Harald?) because it
installed fine.
Ok, together with a short description text, ... but ...
On Feb 5, 7:51 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
Last year I made a lot of experimental packages. They didn'
On Feb 5, 6:59 pm, kcrisman wrote:
> This should be put on the experimental page (Harald?) because it
> installed fine.
Ok, together with a short description text, ... but ...
On Feb 5, 7:51 pm, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Last year I made a lot of experimental packages. They didn't made it in
> for se
Nils Bruin wrote:
On Feb 5, 8:24 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
If I run
./sage -t devel
where is the log file kept? In particular, where is it kept if you use a global
install of Sage, and so don't have write access to any directories under
$SAGE_ROOT?
I do ./sage -t devel > /my/testlog/dir
kcrisman wrote:
On Feb 5, 5:47 am, Jaap Spies wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
It also says it needs Cmake
Cmake 2.4.8 is actually a current experimental spkg, but Dionysos says
it needs 2.6 or above.
You can find one here:http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/cmake-2.6.2.spkg
This should
Interesting. Thanks for this link Harald.
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
> Life's a Beach: Google Summer of Code and the Abelian Sandpile Model
>
> """... and an interface to the free open-source mathematical software,
> Sage, in particular with David Perkinson's Sage San
On Feb 5, 5:47 am, Jaap Spies wrote:
> kcrisman wrote:
>
> >> It also says it needs Cmake
>
> > Cmake 2.4.8 is actually a current experimental spkg, but Dionysos says
> > it needs 2.6 or above.
>
> You can find one
> here:http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/cmake-2.6.2.spkg
This should b
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 9:10 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> On 5 February 2010 16:18, William Stein wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:12 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>>> Here's the explanation. I had thought that check=False just stops the
>>> check that the equations are satisfied (I posted an examples
On Feb 5, 8:24 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> If I run
>
> ./sage -t devel
>
> where is the log file kept? In particular, where is it kept if you use a
> global
> install of Sage, and so don't have write access to any directories under
> $SAGE_ROOT?
I do ./sage -t devel > /my/testlog/dir/test.l
Life's a Beach: Google Summer of Code and the Abelian Sandpile Model
"""... and an interface to the free open-source mathematical software,
Sage, in particular with David Perkinson's Sage Sandpiles software."""
http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2010/02/lifes-beach-google-summer-of-code-and.ht
I don't think it would actually be that hard to add to the Mac Application
(though I haven't tried it) if there were such a command. To my knowledge
however there is not–I asked a few months ago. It would be nice if there were
a way to do this.
I won't have time to work on this for a while,
On 5 February 2010 16:18, William Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:12 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>> Here's the explanation. I had thought that check=False just stops the
>> check that the equations are satisfied (I posted an examples where
>> there were no equations which perhaps hid my poin
On 02/05/2010 08:33 AM, NoSyu wrote:
> I copied from SAGEROOT/devel/sage/doc/en folder to SAGEROOT/devel/sage/
> doc/ko to make Korean version.
>
> Then translating the index.rst file and edit SAGEROOT/devel/sage/doc/
> common/builder.py file like this.
> But When I build the doc and start the not
Hello.
I copied from SAGEROOT/devel/sage/doc/en folder to SAGEROOT/devel/sage/
doc/ko to make Korean version.
Then translating the index.rst file and edit SAGEROOT/devel/sage/doc/
common/builder.py file like this.
LANGUAGES = ['en', 'fr', 'ko']
class DocBuilder(object):
def __init__(self,
If I run
./sage -t devel
where is the log file kept? In particular, where is it kept if you use a global
install of Sage, and so don't have write access to any directories under
$SAGE_ROOT?
I seem to have spent a lot of time running tests, and have no record of the
result, which is annoyin
U.S. Scientists Given Access to Cloud Computing
New York Times, Feb. 4, 2010
The National Science Foundation and the Microsoft Corporation have
agreed to offer American scientific researchers free access to the
company's new cloud computing service.
Ed Lazowska, a University of Washington compu
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
I get some strange test failures on Solaris. The correct result is
issued, but a warning is given, which might indicate the test could be
better written, but I don't know what is intended.
Ignore these, i just realised these were from an older version of Sage.
Dave
--
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 8:12 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> Here's the explanation. I had thought that check=False just stops the
> check that the equations are satisfied (I posted an examples where
> there were no equations which perhaps hid my point; I found this
> while constructing points on a cur
Here's the explanation. I had thought that check=False just stops the
check that the equations are satisfied (I posted an examples where
there were no equations which perhaps hid my point; I found this
while constructing points on a curve in P^2). But in fact it checks
nothing at all.
All I wou
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 6:44 AM, John Cremona wrote:
> First example, nothing unexpected. Note that P is created with a
> tuple and Q with a list.
>
> sage: P2 = ProjectiveSpace(GF(2),2)
> sage: P = P2.point((0,0,1))
> sage: Q = P2.point([0,0,1])
> sage: P
> (0 : 0 : 1)
> sage: Q
> (0 : 0 : 1)
> s
I get some strange test failures on Solaris. The correct result is issued, but a
warning is given, which might indicate the test could be better written, but I
don't know what is intended.
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/modules/vector_modn_sparse_c.pxi"
[17.2 s]
Expected:
0.0
Got:
Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:00:00AM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
As indicated in the thread "4.3.2.rc0 failing on Solaris as R needs
iconv" we now need to add iconv. This is ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8191
This should also help resolve the i
I wanted to add that the Gurobi Optimizer is a high-end LP and MIP
solver whose command-line interface is through Python (Sage actually
provided inspiration for our interface). I'm guessing it would be
fairly easy to call Gurobi from Sage, although I haven't tried it
myself. Gurobi is free for a
First example, nothing unexpected. Note that P is created with a
tuple and Q with a list.
sage: P2 = ProjectiveSpace(GF(2),2)
sage: P = P2.point((0,0,1))
sage: Q = P2.point([0,0,1])
sage: P
(0 : 0 : 1)
sage: Q
(0 : 0 : 1)
sage: P==Q
True
sage: P._coords
[0, 0, 1]
sage: Q._coords
[0, 0, 1]
Now t
John H Palmieri wrote:
On Feb 3, 11:33 pm, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
Than you for finding this error John. It's strange, I never se this on
Solaris myself, though William says he has seen it before on Linux.
IHopefully, this bug can be squashed, though it is not as serious as
the one which is stop
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 6:38 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
I'd like to find the source, and see if I can work out
what went wrong between alpha2 and alpha3, and find out what is causing this
kpsewhich error.
See this directory:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/h
This is a good enough idea that I'm forwarding it to sage-devel (maybe
it even already works?). In principle this could also be done with
the current (optional) Mac app, but would require some nontrivial work
with app bundle preferences and this sort of command.
- kcrisman
On Feb 4, 9:41 pm, Osc
On Feb 5, 2010, at 2:44 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
If this is confirmed, I don't mind using a more sane parent for the
tests. On the other hand, getting a segfault with an (admittedly ill)
piece of pure Python code is not good. Could any expert of the
arcanes
of Integer comparison have a look?
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 11:00:00AM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> As indicated in the thread "4.3.2.rc0 failing on Solaris as R needs
> iconv" we now need to add iconv. This is ticket
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8191
>
> This should also help resolve the issue at
>
> http://tra
As indicated in the thread "4.3.2.rc0 failing on Solaris as R needs iconv" we
now need to add iconv. This is ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8191
This should also help resolve the issue at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7319
which is Cygwin issue.
I downloaded ico
(Sending again, since it doesn't seem to have gone through the first time.)
I'm working on a small class for representing sign matrices, which are
matrices having -1 or 1 entries which represent the class of real
matrices having the same sign pattern. These show up in communication
complexity
kcrisman wrote:
It also says it needs Cmake
Cmake 2.4.8 is actually a current experimental spkg, but Dionysos says
it needs 2.6 or above.
You can find one here:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jsp/cmake-2.6.2.spkg
Jaap
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googleg
I'm working on a small class for representing sign matrices, which are
matrices having -1 or 1 entries which represent the class of real
matrices having the same sign pattern. These show up in communication
complexity, for example. At other times, I've wanted to deal with
matrices having spec
On 02/04/2010 03:56 PM, Maurizio wrote:
Maybe I should not talk because I have no idea on how CodeMirror and
BeSpin work, but I would say that I'd think more than twice before
choosing CodeMirror instead of BeSpin, for this reason:
1) BeSpin is anyway sponsored (or at least hosted) by Mozilla, wh
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
Should I reopen #3381 for this, or create a new bug report?
Please open a new ticket. A golden rule is to refrain from re-opening
a ticket that is already closed.
OK, I've opened
http://trac.sagemath
> If this is confirmed, I don't mind using a more sane parent for the
> tests. On the other hand, getting a segfault with an (admittedly ill)
> piece of pure Python code is not good. Could any expert of the arcanes
> of Integer comparison have a look?
>
Yep, using ZZ as a parent for something whic
Some people in my dept. use Cadabra, a CAS developed with field-theory
in mind (i.e. lots of tensors):
http://cadabra.phi-sci.com/index.html
I have no experience with it so cannot advise on its usability.
However, it's written in C++ and released under GPL2, so ideally could
be wrapped up in Sage.
On 5 Feb, 04:07, John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Feb 3, 11:33 pm, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
> > Than you for finding this error John. It's strange, I never se this on
> > Solaris myself, though William says he has seen it before on Linux.
> > IHopefully, this bug can be squashed, though it is no
55 matches
Mail list logo
