+1 !!!
On Nov 22, 5:49 am, mhampton wrote:
> That would be nice, and interesting. Soliciting at sage-edu will
> surely generate some responses.
>
> -Marshall
>
> On Nov 21, 9:28 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> > Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> > > There's a map here
>
> > >http://www.sagemath.org/developm
Hello all,
Sage 4.3.alpha0 is out! Sage 4.3 now contains much of the new
categories code from the sage-combinat team! It's been in development
for quite awhile, and it's great to finally get it in. There is one
known failure in sage/interfaces/maxima.py caused by #7401. This
issue will be fix
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 8:42 PM, rjf wrote:
> As I've pointed out,
> about 75% of them seem to involve Maxima.
Not even close. However, probably 75% of the messages that you are
able to understand involve Maxima.
> If you add to that the count of messages on
> the Maxima mailing list, is Maxim
On Nov 21, 2009, at 8:42 PM, rjf wrote:
> On Nov 19, 5:27 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
>>
>> I think *everybody* should read that, so people understand precisely
>> what sort of ego-maniac self-aggrandizing opponent the Sage project
>> is
>> up against.
>
> Mathematica is an opponent of Sage? Hu
On Nov 21, 7:27 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Nils Bruin wrote:
> > On Nov 21, 4:42 pm, ghtdak wrote:
> >> In particular, where I'm getting bitten hard is svn and git. Neither
> >> will run with sage's libgnutls.
>
> >> I "almost" had it beat by doing everything without the Sage
> >> environment wh
That would be nice, and interesting. Soliciting at sage-edu will
surely generate some responses.
-Marshall
On Nov 21, 9:28 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> > There's a map here
>
> >http://www.sagemath.org/development-map.html
>
> > showing the location of Sage developers.
>
>
On Nov 19, 5:27 pm, William Stein wrote:
>
> I think *everybody* should read that, so people understand precisely
> what sort of ego-maniac self-aggrandizing opponent the Sage project is
> up against.
Mathematica is an opponent of Sage? Huh? Maybe you mean competition
for Sage?
WRI presuma
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> There's a map here
>
> http://www.sagemath.org/development-map.html
>
> showing the location of Sage developers.
>
> A similar map showing universities/college where Sage is taught might be a
> nice
> feature. The developers seem to be clustered into certain geographic
Nils Bruin wrote:
> On Nov 21, 4:42 pm, ghtdak wrote:
>> In particular, where I'm getting bitten hard is svn and git. Neither
>> will run with sage's libgnutls.
>>
>> I "almost" had it beat by doing everything without the Sage
>> environment which uses general Ubuntu tools until it came to the
>>
ghtdak wrote:
> In particular, where I'm getting bitten hard is svn and git. Neither
> will run with sage's libgnutls.
libgnutls seems to be a problematic package. It will not even build properly on
HP-UX or OpenSolaris, though I can work around it on OpenSolaris.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sag
I've got two very simple trac tickets needing review.
1) One, allows the optional database_cremona_ellcurve to be installed on
Solaris.
Only a *single byte* has changed in spkg-install (removed the '-v' option to
the
'cp' command). The -v option can also be written as '--verbose', and does
On Nov 21, 4:42 pm, ghtdak wrote:
> In particular, where I'm getting bitten hard is svn and git. Neither
> will run with sage's libgnutls.
>
> I "almost" had it beat by doing everything without the Sage
> environment which uses general Ubuntu tools until it came to the
> Enthought suite's "ets" c
Hi,
There is an interesting article in the New York Times today about (1)
how "fat" the stats software SAS company is, as a result of lack of
fierce competition, (2) how R is starting to compete and make them
sweat, and (3) how IBM recently bought SPSS and is hence making SAS
sweat even more (part
There's a map here
http://www.sagemath.org/development-map.html
showing the location of Sage developers.
A similar map showing universities/college where Sage is taught might be a nice
feature. The developers seem to be clustered into certain geographical areas -
I
guess the same might be for
On Nov 19, 10:31 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Carlo Hamalainen
>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 6:14 PM, William Stein wrote:
> >> What happens if you type:
>
> >> sage: !sage-native-execute evincehttp://wiki.sagemath.org/bug18
>
> > Evince pops up with n
Fake submissions?? Huh? By people who want to sell you fake Rolex
watches?
My objection is that the obvious question -- do you "know" maxima is
not
asked. (Similarly Axiom, I guess). But see sci.math.symbolic for
further discussion
of statistics.
On Nov 20, 3:07 am, Harald Schilly wrote:
> O
William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> I just made a small fix to readline's spkg-install, so readline 6.0 builds
>> properly on HP-UX. With that fixed, the first point of failure when building
>> Sage 4.2.1 on HP-UX is with gnutls-2.2.1. Although HP-
Dear developers
The following LaTeX exporession is not nice
sage: latex(x*(1/(x^2)+sqrt(x^7)))
{(\sqrt{x^{7}} + \frac{1}{x^{2}})} x
far better would be
sage: latex(x*(1/(x^2)+sqrt(x^7)))
{\left(\sqrt{x^{7}} + \frac{1}{x^{2}}\right)} x
Is the following code from pynac from file mul.cpp respo
I'm not sure if there is a reason for this, or perhaps it only happens on SPARC
(unlikly), but I upgraded Sage from 4.2. to 4.2.1 and get:
drkir...@kestrel:~/sage-4.2$ ./sage
--
| Sage Version 4.2, Release Date: 2009-10-24
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> I just made a small fix to readline's spkg-install, so readline 6.0 builds
> properly on HP-UX. With that fixed, the first point of failure when building
> Sage 4.2.1 on HP-UX is with gnutls-2.2.1. Although HP-UX is not a supported
> plat
I just made a small fix to readline's spkg-install, so readline 6.0 builds
properly on HP-UX. With that fixed, the first point of failure when building
Sage 4.2.1 on HP-UX is with gnutls-2.2.1. Although HP-UX is not a supported
platform, I created a ticket for this.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sag
On Nov 20, 5:17 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> Has anyone applied for awolframalphaapi id for Sage?
>
Not that I would know of. I'll do it right now, let's see if i get a
response!
H
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
On Nov 20, 12:25 pm, William Stein wrote:
> How many people responded last year?
>
Last year 186 valid answers in nearly 2 weeks. We are now at 156
answers in 4 days.
H
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sag
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:51 AM, cool-RR wrote:
>
>
> On Nov 19, 5:55 pm, Harald Schilly wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 7:37 am, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>>
>> > Is VMWARE outdated
>> > and virtualbox recommended?
>>
>> There is no vmware image. The vmware instructions are just for
>> reference and they were
On Nov 19, 5:55 pm, Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Nov 19, 7:37 am, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> > Is VMWARE outdated
> > and virtualbox recommended?
>
> There is no vmware image. The vmware instructions are just for
> reference and they were used some time ago.
>
> But you do not need them at all. If
25 matches
Mail list logo
