Hi, Mike,
On Nov 9, 2009, at 22:47 , Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Justin C. Walker
> wrote:
>> This is the portion of the upgrade log dealing with the maxima
>> package:
>>
>> sage-spkg maxima-5.19.1.p0 2>&1
>> Warning: Attempted to overwrite SAGE_ROOT environmen
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
>
> Dear category fans,
>
> Here is an updated short status report for the category code. All test
> pass now on 4.2! Here is what remains to be done:
>
> - A positive review on Rings (David K.? Javier?)
> - A positive review on ca
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Justin C. Walker wrote:
> This is the portion of the upgrade log dealing with the maxima package:
>
> sage-spkg maxima-5.19.1.p0 2>&1
> Warning: Attempted to overwrite SAGE_ROOT environment variable
> maxima-5.19.1.p0
> Machine:
> Darwin c-71-198
Hi, all,
On Nov 9, 2009, at 10:04 , Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> Sage 4.2.1.alpha0 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.2.1/alpha0/sage-4.2.1.alpha0.tar
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.2.1/alpha0/s
On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 02:33:49 David Kirkby wrote:
> Who created it?
>
It is quite possibly Tim Abbott from the time he
developed the debian port has everything that is
put in /usr/bin needs a man page by debian policy.
I remember he wrote basic man page for at least
one other program shipped with
Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sage 4.2.1.alpha0 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.2.1/alpha0/sage-4.2.1.alpha0.tar
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.2.1/alpha0/sage-4.2.1.alpha0-sage.math.washington.
> I do not think so. I installed this patch and the command
> sage: maxima("x#0").sage()
> gives still error: TypeError: unable to make sense of Maxima
> expression 'x#0' in Sage
>
> Anyway, I uploaded new patch and hope that problem related to parsing
> # will be solved in another patch.
>
Ah,
Dear category fans,
Here is an updated short status report for the category code. All test
pass now on 4.2! Here is what remains to be done:
- A positive review on Rings (David K.? Javier?)
- A positive review on categories-numberfield_homset-nt.patch
(David Roe??? William ???)
- F
> > * the maxima expression x#0 (x is not equal 0) has no meaning in
> > Sage. If the answer from Maxima contains x#0 and this answer is in
> > variable sol, then
> > sage: sol.sage()
> > fails. I have no idea how and where could fix it. Can somebody add
> > this feature to Sage? Thanks.
>
> Thi
> Also, try putting
> import sage.all
> right at the top of 1.py.
Thanks, William, this just worked.
1.py is a script that uses graphs.
--Pavel.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this g
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Gonzalo Tornaria
I ran notebook() from sage, iceweasel (3.0.14) launches, I tried to
upload a worksheet using a
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:28 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
wrote:
>
> This is with sage 4.2 notebook (both in the atom install mentioned
> above and with sagenb.org):
>
> 1. enter "def f(n): // return n+1" on a cell, evaluate
> 2. enter "f??" on the second cell, evaluate.
>
> the result is a box with "c
This is with sage 4.2 notebook (both in the atom install mentioned
above and with sagenb.org):
1. enter "def f(n): // return n+1" on a cell, evaluate
2. enter "f??" on the second cell, evaluate.
the result is a box with "could not get source code".
Docstrings do work.
Gonzalo.
--~--~---
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:20 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Upload from a URL can't upload from a published worksheet that is
> published as http or https, actually. It never occurred to me to
> implement that. It's meant for uploading sws files, which might be
> sitting on the web somewhere. Up
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Gonzalo Tornaria
>>> I ran notebook() from sage, iceweasel (3.0.14) launches, I tried to
>>> upload a worksheet using an url, and after hitting Up
Get well soon, Burcin.
On Nov 9, 2:06 pm, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:01:16 -0800
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > > Pynac doesn't depend on cln, and the library is named pynac not
> > > ginac. You will probably also need to add the python includes. Make
> > > sure that you do this
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 5:59 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Gonzalo Tornaria
>> I ran notebook() from sage, iceweasel (3.0.14) launches, I tried to
>> upload a worksheet using an url, and after hitting Upload Worksheet
>> the notebook crashes with the following error:
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 12:01:16 -0800
William Stein wrote:
> > Pynac doesn't depend on cln, and the library is named pynac not
> > ginac. You will probably also need to add the python includes. Make
> > sure that you do this in the Sage shell (by using "./sage -sh").
> > Maybe this will work:
> >
>
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:36 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:06:54 -0800 (PST)
> Tom wrote:
>
>>
>> > If you want to take a look at the pynac source code, go to your sage
>> > installation and do:
>> >
>> > ./sage -f -s spkg/standard/pynac-0.1.9.p0.spkg
>> >
>> > cd spkg/build
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 11:46 AM, Gonzalo Tornaria
wrote:
>
> I've just finished compilation of sage-4.2 on a netbook (atom N280) --
> 6h47m walltime.
>
> The OS is debian (testing, very minimal install).
>
> I ran notebook() from sage, iceweasel (3.0.14) launches, I tried to
> upload a worksheet
I've just finished compilation of sage-4.2 on a netbook (atom N280) --
6h47m walltime.
The OS is debian (testing, very minimal install).
I ran notebook() from sage, iceweasel (3.0.14) launches, I tried to
upload a worksheet using an url, and after hitting Upload Worksheet
the notebook crashes wi
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 09:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Tom wrote:
>
> > If you want to take a look at the pynac source code, go to your sage
> > installation and do:
> >
> > ./sage -f -s spkg/standard/pynac-0.1.9.p0.spkg
> >
> > cd spkg/build/pynac-0.1.9/src/ginac
> >
> I did this, but with
>
> cd spkg/build
Hello all,
Sage 4.2.1.alpha0 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.2.1/alpha0/sage-4.2.1.alpha0.tar
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.2.1/alpha0/sage-4.2.1.alpha0-sage.math.washington.edu-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
The up
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 9:25 AM, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Pavel Sutyrin wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After updating from 3.2 to 4.2 (both by sage -upgrade and rebuilding
>> from fresh tarball) I get following result, when trying to merely
>> import graphs.graph modul
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 1:32 AM, Pavel Sutyrin wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After updating from 3.2 to 4.2 (both by sage -upgrade and rebuilding
> from fresh tarball) I get following result, when trying to merely
> import graphs.graph module:
>
> ==
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
>
> Hi there !
>
> I've four different implementations of the same function that I compared for
> timing. Is there any policy in sage for keeping somewhere the timing
> comparison and the slow version in case something is re-optimized in Py
> If you want to take a look at the pynac source code, go to your sage
> installation and do:
>
> ./sage -f -s spkg/standard/pynac-0.1.9.p0.spkg
>
> cd spkg/build/pynac-0.1.9/src/ginac
>
I did this, but with
cd spkg/build/pynac-0.1.9.p0/src/ginac
instead.
I'm trying to write a small class to te
kcrisman wrote:
> This must be a matplotlib issue. Jason, have you noticed this? With
> the non-intersecting axes this is pretty important to have out fixed.
> Also, Henryk, can you give a reproducible example so we can track down
> what a best fix might be? Thanks.
>
> - kcrisman
>
> On Nov 8
This must be a matplotlib issue. Jason, have you noticed this? With
the non-intersecting axes this is pretty important to have out fixed.
Also, Henryk, can you give a reproducible example so we can track down
what a best fix might be? Thanks.
- kcrisman
On Nov 8, 3:02 pm, Henryk Trappmann wro
> > Despite the fact ther there is more elaborated interface to expansion
> > of trigonometric functions in expand_trig, simplify_full blindly
> > applies trigexpand.
>
> > I was not able to find in tracs, why has this bee added.
Just FYI, it was probably added simply to have some functionality
2009/11/9 Francis (Grizzly) Smit :
> David Kirkby wrote:
>> 2009/11/9 Francis (Grizzly) Smit :
>>> there is a sage man page under ubuntu
>>>
>>
>> Who created it? I do not run linux, but if someone can send me a copy,
>> I'll take a look.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
> see attached
Thank you.
--~--~---
David Kirkby wrote:
> 2009/11/9 Francis (Grizzly) Smit :
>
>
>> there is a sage man page under ubuntu
>>
>
> Who created it? I do not run linux, but if someone can send me a copy,
> I'll take a look.
>
> Dave
>
>
see attached
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To pos
2009/11/9 Francis (Grizzly) Smit :
> there is a sage man page under ubuntu
Who created it? I do not run linux, but if someone can send me a copy,
I'll take a look.
Dave
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
2009/11/9 Harald Schilly :
>
> On Nov 9, 11:59 am, David Kirkby wrote:
>> I must admit, I do not really know how to create man pages ...
>
> It might be useful,
I'll create one then. It is now http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7416
> but since sage isn't installed (and hence nothing
> i
Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Nov 9, 11:59 am, David Kirkby wrote:
>
>> I must admit, I do not really know how to create man pages ...
>>
>
> It might be useful, but since sage isn't installed (and hence nothing
> is installed in /usr/man/man1) by default, this might be more
> interesting fo
On Nov 9, 11:59 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> I must admit, I do not really know how to create man pages ...
It might be useful, but since sage isn't installed (and hence nothing
is installed in /usr/man/man1) by default, this might be more
interesting for distributors.
quick search gives many howto
On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 6:59 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>
> I know man pages are pretty useless for describing how to use complex
> bits of software, but they are at least useful for listing the
> options. Even Mathematica has a man page.
>
> I must admit, I do not really know how to create man pages
Hi there !
I've four different implementations of the same function that I compared for
timing. Is there any policy in sage for keeping somewhere the timing
comparison and the slow version in case something is re-optimized in Python ?
I mean : on different machines and different versions of p
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 at 10:46AM +0100, Harald Schilly wrote:
> hi, i have many google wave invites to share. do not hesitate to send
> me an email if you want to be invited. it's a bit offtopic, but there
> were already discussions about sage+google wave (in wave) and it might
> be useful for testin
ma...@mendelu.cz schrieb:
> Dear developers, I looked into sage/symbolics/expressions.pyx and the
> definition of simplify_trig().
>
> This funciton applies trigsimp and trigexpand from Maxima and as a
> result,
> sage: (tan(3*x)).simplify_full()
> gives terrible result
> (4*cos(x)^2 - 1)*sin(x)/(
I know man pages are pretty useless for describing how to use complex
bits of software, but they are at least useful for listing the
options. Even Mathematica has a man page.
I must admit, I do not really know how to create man pages - I always
seem to find one and edit that. I do not mind doing
> After updating from 3.2 to 4.2 (both by sage -upgrade and rebuilding
> from fresh tarball) I get following result, when trying to merely
> import graphs.graph module:
And yes, all unit tests for graphs do pass. :-/
--Pavel.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to thi
hi, i have many google wave invites to share. do not hesitate to send
me an email if you want to be invited. it's a bit offtopic, but there
were already discussions about sage+google wave (in wave) and it might
be useful for testing some time in the future ...
H
--~--~-~--~~-
Hi all,
After updating from 3.2 to 4.2 (both by sage -upgrade and rebuilding
from fresh tarball) I get following result, when trying to merely
import graphs.graph module:
==
pa...@pavelx:~$ uname -a
Linux pavelx 2.6.30-2-amd64 #1 SMP Fri Sep
44 matches
Mail list logo
