2009/11/7 Willem Jan Palenstijn :
>
> On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 11:02:07AM +, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> I built Sage 4.2 on Solaris 10 on a Sun Netra T1 running the first release of
>> Solaris 10.
>>
>> Whilst computing things like 1+1 work fine in command line mode, they do not
>> work in t
William Stein a écrit :
>> I'm not sure why, but the storage abstraction broke my multiple boxes
>> acting as compute nodes via NFS and server_pool. If I run the
>> notebook with a localhost login server_pool=['sa...@localhost'], then
>> it works. If I don't, server_pool=['sa...@node1'], then it
OK, sorry about that dupe. I've checked out your patch and given it a
positive review.
-Marshall
On Nov 8, 8:14 pm, William Stein wrote:
> > I'm maybe going to fix this right now.
>
> OK, patch up -- somebody should review it (it's quite short).
>
> -- William
--~--~-~--~~
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 6:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:17 PM, mhampton wrote:
>>
>> OK, I've made this ticket #7413:
>> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7413.
>>
>> -Marshall
>
> I've closed this as a dupe of #5324, and added a remark that any
> percent mode c
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 12:17 PM, mhampton wrote:
>
> OK, I've made this ticket #7413:
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7413.
>
> -Marshall
I've closed this as a dupe of #5324, and added a remark that any
percent mode causes problems:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5324
I
> I'm not sure why, but the storage abstraction broke my multiple boxes
> acting as compute nodes via NFS and server_pool. If I run the
> notebook with a localhost login server_pool=['sa...@localhost'], then
> it works. If I don't, server_pool=['sa...@node1'], then it appears
> that the server o
2009/11/9 Gonzalo Tornaria :
>
> David,
>
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:15 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>> If you look on the thread
>>
>> " Do we need "cp -a" - or would 'cp -pR' do ?"
>>
>> you may have noticed that Gonzalo Tornaria has discovered that
>> "local/bin/python" is a hardlink to "local
David,
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:15 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>
> If you look on the thread
>
> " Do we need "cp -a" - or would 'cp -pR' do ?"
>
> you may have noticed that Gonzalo Tornaria has discovered that
> "local/bin/python" is a hardlink to "local/bin/python2.6". From what I
> understand,
On Oct 14, 11:03 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Thierry Dumont
>
>
>
>
>
> wrote:
> > William Stein a écrit :
> >> Hi,
>
> >> Nearly two weeks ago I had the notebook stabilized and all known new
> >> bugs fixed (after separating it off from sage as a separate progr
If you look on the thread
" Do we need "cp -a" - or would 'cp -pR' do ?"
you may have noticed that Gonzalo Tornaria has discovered that
"local/bin/python" is a hardlink to "local/bin/python2.6". From what I
understand, this is the only hard link in Sage. It would be better if
this could be repl
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 9:31 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> Hopefully, -pR may work for any POSIX system if the reason for the
> hard link is known. I can't see what creates that link myself. You
> clearly have a much greater understanding of the issues than me.
Just to clarify, the option "-pR" is no
2009/11/8 Gonzalo Tornaria :
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> But how did you find out these two were hard links? I'm not aware of any way
>> to
>> find if A is a hard link of B, unless one finds the inodes and compares them,
>> which would be next to impossible
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> Gonzalo Tornaria wrote:
>> Is it really necessary for sage-bdist to preserve hardlinks?
>>
>> [ ... checking a bdist tarball of 4.1.1 ... ]
>>
>> there is exactly one hardlink in this bdist tarball:
>> "local/bin/python" is a hardlink to
Hi,
let me give a quick reference for starting with ppa:
http://blog.bodhizazen.net/linux/launchpad-ppa-tips/
regards
Maurizio
On Oct 24, 5:30 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> The IRC logs show a recent conversation (again) about Sage packaging for
> Ubuntu. We all know it would be a massive amount
Hi
> I think the design problem comes from the fact the "category of
> enumerated sets" is not real "category" from the mathematical point of
> view, although you can embed it inside the category of totally ordered
> sets with the "enumeration order", that point of view might solve some
> o
OK, I've made this ticket #7413: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7413.
-Marshall
On Nov 7, 11:22 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Nov 7, 2009, at 5:57 PM, mhampton wrote:
>
> > Someone reading a tutorial I wrote on cython was quite confused
> > because the header "%cython " in a cell g
Did anyone notice that the plot scale sometimes does not contain any
number or sometimes only contains one number? Unfortunately I have no
simple example to reproduce. But its not a problem with too small or
too big numbers.
I think the plot function should guaranty that at least two numbers
are
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:01 PM, Gonzalo Tornaria
wrote:
> This doesn't happen in "sage -python", but it does happen in "sage
> -ipython", so I guess is ipython related. However, both versions seem
> to be using ipython 9.1...
This is the pprint (pretty print) module. From ipython's man page:
-[
Dear developers, I looked into sage/symbolics/expressions.pyx and the
definition of simplify_trig().
This funciton applies trigsimp and trigexpand from Maxima and as a
result,
sage: (tan(3*x)).simplify_full()
gives terrible result
(4*cos(x)^2 - 1)*sin(x)/(4*cos(x)^3 - 3*cos(x))
Despite the fact
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> But how did you find out these two were hard links? I'm not aware of any way
> to
> find if A is a hard link of B, unless one finds the inodes and compares them,
> which would be next to impossible where there are a lot of files. I assum
On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 2:29 AM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
>
> This is a bit disconcerting:
>
> sage: Set(['a', 'b', 'c'])
> {'a', 'c', 'b'}
I am surprised by the following:
sage: s = set(['a', 'b', 'c'])
sage: repr(s)
"set(['a', 'c', 'b'])"
sage: str(s)
"set(['a', 'c', 'b'])"
s
Hi there,
On Nov 8, 9:36 am, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> There are some design questions which prevented me to do it at first. Let's
> start with the simple one:
>
> - on mathematical sets we have the notion of intersection, union, symmetric
> difference. When dealing with EnumeratedSets, does some
Hi Alex,
By the way, I think this is a good moment to advertise for a very good idea
Nicolas had a few years ago, that is to implement and use the very common and
basic notion of family:
A Family is an associative container which models a family
`(f_i)_{i in I}`. Then, f[i]
Hi there,
> And another example, where I (would like to) follow the example of the
> constructor for multivariate polynomials:
>
> sage: FreeGroup('x', 10)
> Expected:
> Free Group on the Set {x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, x8, x9}
> Got:
> Free Group on the Set {x8, x9, x2, x
24 matches
Mail list logo
