On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I was reading through the Cygwin User's Guide today and decided to try
> again to try to get Sage to startup on Cygwin. I took my 4.1 build
> (see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743 for links to
> tickets and patches n
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:15 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mike Hansen and I have released sage-4.2.
>
> You can download the source here:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/src/sage-4.2.tar
> Binaries, official announcements, etc., will follow in a few days.
>
> You can also upgrade
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 9:36 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM, William Stein
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was reading through the Cygwin User's Guide today and decided to
>>> try
>>> again to try to get Sage to s
Hello,
Mike Hansen and I have released sage-4.2.
You can download the source here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/src/sage-4.2.tar
Binaries, official announcements, etc., will follow in a few days.
You can also upgrade with "sage -upgrade http://sagemath.org/packages";
(the url is only ne
On Oct 24, 2009, at 6:08 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 at 11:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> I don't know what PPA package means, but if we provide our own
>> repository, then certainly we can make a monolithic package as
>> described above. Moreover, there are genuine advantage
On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:10 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> mhampton wrote:
>
>> One thing that was mentioned on another thread is that the version
>> number for sage-4.1.2 was quite misleading. It would help a lot if
>> the version numbers were more grounded in reality. One simple change
>> might be to
On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM, William Stein
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was reading through the Cygwin User's Guide today and decided to
>> try
>> again to try to get Sage to startup on Cygwin. I took my 4.1 build
>> (see http://trac.sagema
+1 this is a very good idea
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> mhampton wrote:
>
>>
>> One thing that was mentioned on another thread is that the version
>> number for sage-4.1.2 was quite misleading. It would help a lot if
>> the version numbers were more grounded in reali
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Robert Dodier wrote:
> On 10/24/09, William Stein wrote:
>
>> I can't get Maxima--5.19.1 to build on Itanium on top of ECL. The
>> build fails with:
>>
>> ...
>> ;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-SYMM.
>> ;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-ASYM.
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 4:11 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reading through the Cygwin User's Guide today and decided to try
> again to try to get Sage to startup on Cygwin. I took my 4.1 build
> (see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743 for links to
> tickets and patches nee
mhampton wrote:
>
> One thing that was mentioned on another thread is that the version
> number for sage-4.1.2 was quite misleading. It would help a lot if
> the version numbers were more grounded in reality. One simple change
> might be to not pick the version number until a final release has
I agree. I think there are a number of people who feel this way and
to some extent have been ignored. Of course this is partly because of
the volunteer effort issue - if this is important than people need to
volunteer to work on it.
One thing that was mentioned on another thread is that the ver
On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 at 11:50AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> I don't know what PPA package means, but if we provide our own
> repository, then certainly we can make a monolithic package as
> described above. Moreover, there are genuine advantages, in that the
> Debian package system will search th
I gave it a positive review.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> There's an implementation of the dicyclic groups up now at
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7244
>
> Rob
> >
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an
On 2009-Oct-20 20:42:40 -0700, William Stein wrote:
>My remark about not hosting a FreeBSD virtual machine was inspired by
>Peter's remark that "Unfortunately, FreeBSD support in VirtualBox
>is still a work-in-progress and isn't production-ready." I don't know
>if that is really true though given
Hi all,
let me share with you some thoughts.
I know that this community likes a lot the strategy "release soon,
release often"; I tend to like this as well. What I don't like,
altogether, is the chance to have once in a while a quite buggy
release on our way, which is, in my opinion, not unlikely
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
>> Personally, I can not see anything wrong with adding it to the
>> configure script. One could add
>>
>> "If you only intend building Sage for use on your own computer, you
>> can safely ignore this warning."
>
> Irr
Hi,
I was reading through the Cygwin User's Guide today and decided to try
again to try to get Sage to startup on Cygwin. I took my 4.1 build
(see http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6743 for links to
tickets and patches needed to get this to build), and was able to get
it start up (finall
Instead of stripping Ubuntu, what about building up a minimal Debian?
Any command-line skills used in development work would transfer over
to a more-desktop oriented distribution based in Debian, such as
Ubuntu. The "testing" distribution of Debian, despite the name, has
always worked well for me
On Oct 24, 2009, at 10:36 AM, Dr David Kirkby wrote:
> On Oct 24, 5:52 pm, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Georg S. Weber wrote:
Hi,
>>
for the record, the (above mentioned) Wikipedia article:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wi
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> Interesting. Do you have some notes about your KVM setup? I want to
>> try it as well, as the ubuntu guys seem to prefer it over virtualbox:
I'm using kvm directly (not libvirt / vi
All tests passed on my somewhat flaky AMD Turion TL-50 laptop, on
Ubuntu 9.04.
-Marshall
On Oct 23, 5:14 am, Mike Hansen wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Sage 4.2.alpha1 is out. Source and binary areavailable at
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/release/4.2/alpha1/sage-...http://sage.mat
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Jan Groenewald wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
>> @debian experts: Is it easy to make a PPA package for Sage and put it on
>> launchpad?
>
> @debian experts:
>
> Does a PPA package have to follow debian rules, or can
Hi
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 11:30:46AM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
> @debian experts: Is it easy to make a PPA package for Sage and put it on
> launchpad?
@debian experts:
Does a PPA package have to follow debian rules, or can it be something
like a binary deb from checkinstall which prepares th
On 10/24/09, William Stein wrote:
> I can't get Maxima--5.19.1 to build on Itanium on top of ECL. The
> build fails with:
>
> ...
> ;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-SYMM.
> ;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-ASYM.
> ;;; Internal error: #
> ; - Loading binary file "binary-ec
On Oct 24, 5:52 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
> > Georg S. Weber wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> for the record, the (above mentioned) Wikipedia article:
> >>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29
> >> seems to be quite close
On Sep 22, 6:25 pm, Tom Boothby wrote:
> I spent a while thinking that I was going to be a mechanical engineer,
> and took a few of the ME intro courses. Engineering statics and
> dynamics can be phrased entirely in terms of linear algebra, though
> the courses I took didn't present them as su
On Oct 23, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Georg S. Weber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> for the record, the (above mentioned) Wikipedia article:
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Darwin_%28operating_system%29
>> seems to be quite close to the truth;
>> on MacPPC OS X 10.4.11 "uname -r" gives me:
The IRC logs show a recent conversation (again) about Sage packaging for
Ubuntu. We all know it would be a massive amount of work to update
things, which almost no one knows how to do.
@debian experts: Is it easy to make a PPA package for Sage and put it on
launchpad?
We tell people it's eas
Maurizio wrote:
>> I have been wondering whether we should start over and create a
>> (fairly minimal) ubuntu 9.10 install using squashfs and unionfs? What
>> do you think? There are a lot of good ideas in the approach of Puppy
>> Linux... but that doesn't mean we actually have to use it in the
Something Peter Jeremy said on sage-devel cause me to check what libraries the
libraries in Sage where opening.
My LD_LIBRARY_PATH was set to /usr/local/lib before running Sage.
drkir...@swan:[~] $ cd /export/home/drkirkby/sage-4.1.2.rc2
Set up the Sage environment:
drkir...@swan:[~/sage-4.1
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> Hi David,
>
> Thanks for the comments. The "Quaternion Group" Wikipedia page seems
> to differ substantially with the "Dicyclic Group" page:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dicyclic_group
>
> which says:
>
> "More generally, when n is a pow
On Oct 24, 11:38 am, Maurizio wrote:
> > I have been wondering whether we should start over and create a
> > (fairly minimal) ubuntu 9.10 install using squashfs and unionfs? What
> > do you think? There are a lot of good ideas in the approach of Puppy
> > Linux... but that doesn't mean we act
Hi Martin!
On Oct 24, 9:52 am, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
> sage: p.subs(**{'x2':x2})
> -7/2*x1*x2 + 1/2*x2^2 - x0*x3 + 1/165*x1 + 3
>
> Note the two stars. The reason why the subs function accepts a dictionary is
> that its signature is:
>
> p.subs(self, fixed, **kw=None)
>
> i.e. it also accep
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2009-Oct-23 00:45:00 +0100, "Dr. David Kirkby"
> wrote:
>> I had changed the wording somewhat anyway, but I would admit I had not
>> considered other applications.
>
> I suspect that most potential users won't be able to dedicate a host to
> Sage - especially if they a
> I have been wondering whether we should start over and create a
> (fairly minimal) ubuntu 9.10 install using squashfs and unionfs? What
> do you think? There are a lot of good ideas in the approach of Puppy
> Linux... but that doesn't mean we actually have to use it in the long
> run.
>
> I wo
> Isn't it the case that actually p.subs(x2=x2) is *equivalent* to p.subs
> ({'x2':x2}) in Python?
No, this isn't the same in Python. You are looking for:
sage: R.=QQ[]
sage: S = QQ['x0,x1,x2,x3']
sage: p=S.random_element()
sage: p.subs(x2=x2)
and
sage: p.subs(**{'x2':x2})
-7/2*x1*x2 + 1/2*x2^
Hi!
At
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/38dfa72aff118470
David Madore asked a question about substitution.
While I tried to answer it, I found the following behaviour of subs()
that, to my knowledge, is technically impossible, given how keyword
arguments are pass
An error happens while compiling clmacs:
;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-SYMM.
;;; Emitting code for DO-MERGE-ASYM.
;;; Internal error: #
; - Binary file binary-ecl/clmacs.fas is old or does not exist.
;Compile (and load) source file
/home/wstein/screen/cleo/build/sage-4.2.alpha1/spkg
39 matches
Mail list logo
