On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
>
>>> And, let's be honest, no
>>> release cycle is really going to be much shorter than that.
>>
>> Are you sure? I personally did 100% of the releases for 3 years with
>> an average of 1-week for the release cycle.
>>
>
> Who knows -- maybe
On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:43 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
>
>>> And, let's be honest, no
>>> release cycle is really going to be much shorter than that.
>>
>> Are you sure? I personally did 100% of the releases for 3 years
>> with
>> an average of 1-week for the release cycle.
>>
>
> Who knows -- mayb
Marshall,
Limited Googling got me: http://www.sheet-labels.com/printing/
$35 for 500 stickers at 1" x 0.625" which was the smallest I could
find. Lots of options - rounded corners, different sizes, etc.
Rob
On Oct 13, 7:07 pm, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> I like the sticker idea too. I'm not
>> And, let's be honest, no
>> release cycle is really going to be much shorter than that.
>
> Are you sure? I personally did 100% of the releases for 3 years with
> an average of 1-week for the release cycle.
>
Who knows -- maybe I'm wrong? Do you want to test it? Try doing
sage-4.2 in a week.
It's been discussed before, but maybe it is relevant for this
discussion. Realize I have zero experience with release management
and an incomplete understanding of everything involved, so take this
for what it is worth.
I wonder if the "lieutenant" model used by Linux kernel development
might be
On Oct 13, 2009, at 9:30 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>> I was just about to compose a long email on this thread, but you've
>> essentially hit every point I wanted to make. In fact, I see no
>> advantage for long release cycles at all--it'
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Craig Citro wrote:
>
>> The question is what, exactly, makes actually
>> getting releases out so difficult? Is most of the time spent getting
>> things working on uncommon (presumably little-tested) systems? Are the
>> obstructions typically due to patches that we
> I wonder if it would also be good to archive bdists for one specific
> Linux release, e.g., 32-bit x86 Ubuntu 8.04 LTS? Since then one can
> easily get a virtual machine and drop our binary in it.
>
I think this would be a really good idea -- tar xjf on sage.math is a
*much* lower barrier to te
> The question is what, exactly, makes actually
> getting releases out so difficult? Is most of the time spent getting
> things working on uncommon (presumably little-tested) systems? Are the
> obstructions typically due to patches that were not actually ready to
> go in (despite positive reviews)
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I was just about to compose a long email on this thread, but you've
> essentially hit every point I wanted to make. In fact, I see no
> advantage for long release cycles at all--it's more work for the
> release manager, and it's not like u
Hi Luis,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:33 PM, louie wrote:
>
> I volunteered to translate some of the docs to Spanish and my first
> uploaded file "A Tour of Sage" was a failure since later I learned by
> mvngu that the acronym SAGE has been abandoned and which I used
> generously.
This happens a
On Oct 13, 2009, at 8:09 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
>>
>> I know we have had this discussion before, but I do not seem to be
>> alone
>> on my views on this one.
>>
>> It is not clear to me there needs to be very frequent releases. I
>> know
>> you say Apple itunes bri
libm4ri has two issues that I am aware of as soon as one tries to use a
non-GNU or non-86 environment.
I believe the developers hang out here, so I'll put a bit of information
here, on the hope they see it.
1) Despite the fact Sun's C compiler can compile thousands of lines of
Sage without a
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 at 07:38PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> That's weird because I tested on Ubuntu 9.04 (and 8.04) 64-bit and
> don't have this problem. Hmm... It makes me evily miss the days of
> "any input with random in it has output not checked".
>
> Can you open a ticket? I don't think th
I mostly agree. 2 months is acceptable. 6 months seems too long for
all the reaons Jason articulated.
-Marshall
On Oct 13, 10:09 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> As it is, there is a semi-major research code contribution I plan to
> make before Christmas that will be needed at a workshop in January,
On Oct 13, 8:47 pm, William Stein wrote:
> I'm not sure. Where is all this???
Oops, I forgot to mention the Trac, under ticket #7192
Thanks, professor.
- Luis V. -
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To u
William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you see any pattern in the access logs for IP addresses?
>> Yes, they are all 192.168.1.1. :-) Everything is proxied through
> I was trying to figure out what happened and realized today I had run
> the migration script to migrate to the new notebook format. It
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:43 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 7:22 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:13 PM, John H Palmieri
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Oct 13, 8:38 am, William Stein wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>>
>> >> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> I know we have had this discussion before, but I do not seem to be alone
> on my views on this one.
>
> It is not clear to me there needs to be very frequent releases. I know
> you say Apple itunes brings out a new release every couple of weeks, but
> this is quit
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:57 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>>
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> So there have been over *5000* new user accounts created on
>>> http://sagenb.org just this morning. The number of users has
>>> increased dra
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Wow, it has been a full 2 months since a Sage release.
>> How do I find source code for old releases of SAGE!?
>
> The reason I was looking is because it has been exactly 2 months since
> the last Sage release, to t
On Oct 13, 7:22 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:13 PM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 13, 8:38 am, William Stein wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>
> >>http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Marshall Hampton wrote:
>
>
>>
>> In many talks, etc., I have made a big stink about how every released
>> version of Sage is available, so if a paper uses sage-x.y.z, then it
>> is possible to get sage-x.y.z and try out the computation (unlike the
>> situation wi
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 at 08:38AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
>
> Built fine on Ubuntu 9.04 amd64, but doctesting has one r
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 2009, at 6:45 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Robert Bradshaw
>> wrote:
This thread is mainly about Gonzalo's proposal that we target
something like busybox (or my suggestion "python")
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 at 08:38AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
Built fine on Ubuntu 9.04 amd64, but doctesting has one repeatable
failure:
dr...@sagenb:~/s/sage-4.1.2.rc2$ ./sa
>
> In many talks, etc., I have made a big stink about how every released
> version of Sage is available, so if a paper uses sage-x.y.z, then it
> is possible to get sage-x.y.z and try out the computation (unlike the
> situation with magma, say).So I think making the old source easy
> to find
On Oct 13, 2009, at 6:45 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>>> This thread is mainly about Gonzalo's proposal that we target
>>> something like busybox (or my suggestion "python") instead of POSIX
>>> standard shell usage. Somehow it is amazing
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:13 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> On Oct 13, 8:38 am, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
>>
>> If nobody finds any serious problems with it, somethin
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:09 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Wow, it has been a full 2 months since a Sage release.
> How do I find source code for old releases of SAGE!?
The reason I was looking is because it has been exactly 2 months since
the last Sage release, to the day. According to
http://s
On Oct 13, 8:38 am, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
>
> If nobody finds any serious problems with it, something close to it
> will get released (though I'm not in a hurry).
Here
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>>> To be honest, if we have a configure script at the top level, we might
>>> as well move the stuff from prereq into it. It would look a lot more
>>> 'normal' if someone see the configure script was checking for
I like the sticker idea too. I'm not sure how to go about making them
- anyone know a good place to order custom tiny stickers? It would be
cool to use the sage logo if it could be printed small & crisply.
-Marshall
On Oct 13, 7:21 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 at 10:38PM -0700,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:33 PM, louie wrote:
>
> I volunteered to translate some of the docs to Spanish and my first
> uploaded file "A Tour of Sage" was a failure since later I learned by
> mvngu that the acronym SAGE has been abandoned and which I used
> generously.
Well I'm *sure* that does
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>> This thread is mainly about Gonzalo's proposal that we target
>> something like busybox (or my suggestion "python") instead of POSIX
>> standard shell usage. Somehow it is amazingly difficult to keep this
>> discussion on track!
>>
>> De
William Stein wrote:
>> To be honest, if we have a configure script at the top level, we might
>> as well move the stuff from prereq into it. It would look a lot more
>> 'normal' if someone see the configure script was checking for the
>> compilers, checking for perl etc. Just do not let the conf
I volunteered to translate some of the docs to Spanish and my first
uploaded file "A Tour of Sage" was a failure since later I learned by
mvngu that the acronym SAGE has been abandoned and which I used
generously.
Now I would like to either fix it onsite or upload again, what should
I do?
Next, I
On Oct 13, 2009, at 6:22 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, David Kirkby > wrote:
>>
>> 2009/10/13 William Stein :
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:53 AM, David Kirkby
>>> wrote:
On Oct 12, 8:27 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 200
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 at 01:54AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> Currently the top of the 'makefile' says:
>>
>> # WARNING: Unless you are certain that you want to use all the
>> cores/processors
>> # on your system for parallel doctesting, chan
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>
> 2009/10/13 William Stein :
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:53 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Oct 12, 8:27 pm, William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>>>
> Most of the problems in Sage
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
>> wrote:
>>> Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
On 10/13/2009 08:36 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> 2009/10/13 Ralf Hemmecke :
>> Would there be interest in the follow
On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 at 01:54AM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> Currently the top of the 'makefile' says:
>
> # WARNING: Unless you are certain that you want to use all the
> cores/processors
> # on your system for parallel doctesting, change the value of NUM_THREADS to
> # a (sensible) positive
On Oct 13, 2009, at 10:41 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
> 2009/10/13 William Stein :
>>
>>
>> That's a great argument. Unfortunately, you can make exactly the
>> same
>> argument with respect to asking Windows/Linux/OS X developers to
>> use a
>> POSIX-only environment. "Another issue to conside
Hi David,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
> It seems to me, that the default has been set to 10, which is probably
> not desirably in 99% of cases.
That is entirely my fault. Sorry about the confusion.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
--~--~-~--~~--
Currently the top of the 'makefile' says:
# WARNING: Unless you are certain that you want to use all the
cores/processors
# on your system for parallel doctesting, change the value of NUM_THREADS to
# a (sensible) positive integer. The default value is zero.
NUM_THREADS=10 # default is zero
Bu
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>>> On 10/13/2009 08:36 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
2009/10/13 Ralf Hemmecke :
> Would there be interest in the following workflow for installing sage.
>
> a) Get the sage tarbal
On Oct 13, 2009, at 5:09 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> The script prereq-0.3 script William wrote some time back checks the
> build environment is sane. I've updated this code to prereq-0.4
>
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7021
>
> but there is an issue which I did not address, which I th
On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:29 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> Dear Anne, Dan, William, Florent, Jason, ...
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Daniel Bump wrote:
>>> The next Sage version will be 4.2. Send me a list of technical
>>> patches with positive review related to categories
On Oct 13, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> Hi Robert, Craig,
>
> Any chances for you to review shortly:
>
> http://combinat.sagemath.org/patches/file/tip/categories-fixsagelib-nt.patch
500 - Internal Server Error
- Robert
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~
On Mon, 12 Oct 2009 at 10:38PM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I wonder if little stickers with a Sage logo might be an additional
> approach. Project NExT has their colored dots, department chairs are
> another colored sticker, Board of Governors have their pins, the
> Budapest study abroad program ha
The script prereq-0.3 script William wrote some time back checks the
build environment is sane. I've updated this code to prereq-0.4
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7021
but there is an issue which I did not address, which I think needs
addressing. But I'm not sure the best way to do it.
lutusp wrote:
> I'm aware there has been some discussion of this issue in the past,
> but I would like to renew it. I understand that canonical DE notation
> isn't on everyone's short list of high priorities, but I think
> students and those with little Sage exposure would appreciate the
> ability
I spent quite a bit of time updating some code which does some
preliminary checks of the Sage build.
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/7021
William thought it was such an improvement, he made it a blocker for
4.1.2, which I must admit pleased me.
I would be interested if anyone can try to
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:15 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>> On 10/13/2009 08:36 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>> 2009/10/13 Ralf Hemmecke :
Would there be interest in the following workflow for installing sage.
a) Get the sage tarball
b) extract the tarbal
Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> On 10/13/2009 08:36 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
>> 2009/10/13 Ralf Hemmecke :
>>> Would there be interest in the following workflow for installing sage.
>>>
>>> a) Get the sage tarball
>>> b) extract the tarbal to SOMEDIR
>>> c) cd SOMEDIR
>>> d) configure (with or without --pre
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 09:41:57AM +1000, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Terry Tao recently delivered a talk at Melbourne University,
> Australia. I didn't attend the talk. Perhaps Alex Ghitza did? Anyway,
> Terry has uploaded his talk slides at
>
> http://terrytao.wordpress.com/2009/08/27/mathematical-res
I will try to look at it in the next week or so. Hopefully by this weekend.
Thanks for working on it!
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:12 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> Hello all
>
> This is for developers interested in Calculus.
>
> Since the patch for #385 is available and seems to work for me, I
On Oct 13, 2:09 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I agree that this notation is nice. One issue with this approach is
> that the single quote is already used in Python. For example,
>
> sage: u'(x) + y'
> u'(x) + y'
>
> sage: type(_)
>
>
> sage: r'''(t)'''
> '(t)'
>
> How would one distingui
Hi folks,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
And here's a sage.math binary:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/release/upgrade/sage-4.1
On 10/13/2009 08:36 PM, David Kirkby wrote:
> 2009/10/13 Ralf Hemmecke :
>> Would there be interest in the following workflow for installing sage.
>>
>> a) Get the sage tarball
>> b) extract the tarbal to SOMEDIR
>> c) cd SOMEDIR
>> d) configure (with or without --prefix)
>> e) make
>> f) make ins
Hi!
On 13 Okt., 23:09, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
...
> sage: u'(x) + y'
> u'(x) + y'
>
> sage: type(_)
>
Very good example! Since ' is used for python strings, I guess the
only realistic chance is to look for different, but similar
characters. For example ` (backtick) or ´ (no idea how this o
Hi,
Currently I think trac.sagemath.org is setup to use the default
builtin Python webserver. This sucks performance wise. I discovered
that Microsoft's MSN search engine was pounding trac.sagemath.org, and
"ErwinJunge" on irc suggested we just completely block MSN (using
iptables -I INPUT -s
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
>>
>> If nobody finds any serious problems with it, something close to it
>> will get
On Oct 13, 2009, at 1:24 PM, lutusp wrote:
> I'm aware there has been some discussion of this issue in the past,
> but I would like to renew it. I understand that canonical DE notation
> isn't on everyone's short list of high priorities, but I think
> students and those with little Sage exposure
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> So there have been over *5000* new user accounts created on
>> http://sagenb.org just this morning. The number of users has
>> increased dramatically. Does anybody have any idea why?
>>
>
>
> Do you see a
i've no idea, i have seen that for example in brazil are presentations
(google docs) running that point to sagemath. so, only indirectly
through referrers. it would be a big help to include the analytics
code on the login page for sagenb.org .. then we know from where the
users are coming (country
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So there have been over *5000* new user accounts created on
> http://sagenb.org just this morning. The number of users has
> increased dramatically. Does anybody have any idea why?
>
Do you see any pattern in the access logs for IP addresses? Are all the
use
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
>
> If nobody finds any serious problems with it, something close to it
> will get released (though I'm not in a hurry).
>
> KNOWN PROBLEMS:
>
Hi,
So there have been over *5000* new user accounts created on
http://sagenb.org just this morning. The number of users has
increased dramatically. Does anybody have any idea why?
It's not some spambot -- I've been looking at accounts names and
content, and people are doing mainly standard u
I'm aware there has been some discussion of this issue in the past,
but I would like to renew it. I understand that canonical DE notation
isn't on everyone's short list of high priorities, but I think
students and those with little Sage exposure would appreciate the
ability to enter a textbook equ
Hi Robert, Craig,
Any chances for you to review shortly:
http://combinat.sagemath.org/patches/file/tip/categories-fixsagelib-nt.patch
Thanks!
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil"
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--~--~-~--~~~-
Dear Anne, Dan, William, Florent, Jason, ...
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 09:10:24AM -0700, Daniel Bump wrote:
> > The next Sage version will be 4.2. Send me a list of technical
> > patches with positive review related to categories, and they can be
> > the *first* to go in. I also see 4.2 a
2009/10/13 Ralf Hemmecke :
> Would there be interest in the following workflow for installing sage.
>
> a) Get the sage tarball
> b) extract the tarbal to SOMEDIR
> c) cd SOMEDIR
> d) configure (with or without --prefix)
> e) make
> f) make install
I would add
g) make test
I must admit, I would
> Is this question addressed to me, or ?
Yes.
Note that the root system patch depends on the category
patches, which why it came in this thread. Various other
long pending patches depend on it.
Dan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to
Hi all,
I started this project: http://code.google.com/p/fastfunlib/
I'm going to implement algorithms that I originally prototyped in
Python or Cython for mpmath earlier this year; I'm doing it in plain C
since the code mostly involves plain GMP/MPIR calls and additional
dependencies aren't rea
>> So there are three things
>> 1. "sage" should be the only entry point for any non-developer.
>> 2. $SAGE_ROOT/local/bin is not known to non-developers.
>> 3. Inside $SAGE_ROOT/local/bin scripts can assume a proper environment.
>
> I think this is a good suggestion.
Would there be interest in
2009/10/13 William Stein :
>
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:53 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Oct 12, 8:27 pm, William Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>>
>>> > Most of the problems in Sage are not at the shell level.
>>>
>>> Yes, but the problems that have
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
>> The "hottest" repository is the one you saw. :-)
>
> Probably not. I am using 4.1 not yet 4.1.1.
>
>> The script $SAGE_ROOt/sage is not under revision control.
>
> :-(
>
> And what is http://hg.sagemath.org/scripts-main/ ???
The latest r
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:53 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
>>> If the logic is that the only entry point to the local/bin scripts is
>>> through the "sage" shell script then why would there be ever SAGE_ROOT
>>> be unset (except in evil cases where someone removes it from the
>>> environment)?
>>
>>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:10 AM, Daniel Bump wrote:
>
>
>> The next Sage version will be 4.2. Send me a list of technical
>> patches with positive review related to categories, and they can be
>> the *first* to go in. I also see 4.2 as being a relatively quick
>> release (compared to the extrem
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>>
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
>
> Here's an upgrade path:
>
> http://sage.math
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:38 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
>
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
Here's an upgrade path:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mvngu/release/upgrade/sage-4.1.2.rc2/
--
Regar
> The "hottest" repository is the one you saw. :-)
Probably not. I am using 4.1 not yet 4.1.1.
> The script $SAGE_ROOt/sage is not under revision control.
:-(
And what is http://hg.sagemath.org/scripts-main/ ???
Looks at least a bit more up-to-date than my .hg. Is that the hottest?
Ralf
--~
> The next Sage version will be 4.2. Send me a list of technical
> patches with positive review related to categories, and they can be
> the *first* to go in. I also see 4.2 as being a relatively quick
> release (compared to the extremely long 4.1.2).
Is it possible to conjecture a timetable f
>> If the logic is that the only entry point to the local/bin scripts is
>> through the "sage" shell script then why would there be ever SAGE_ROOT
>> be unset (except in evil cases where someone removes it from the
>> environment)?
>
> That is definitely not the case.
OK. But then I would sugges
Hi,
This is a release candidate for Sage-4.1.2:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.1.2.rc2.tar
If nobody finds any serious problems with it, something close to it
will get released (though I'm not in a hurry).
KNOWN PROBLEMS:
* doesn't work on itanium at all (we'll
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> The readline problem can be worked around by copying the system version of
> libreadline to $SAGE_ROOT$/local/lib/. Well, at least it worked on my
> machine.
Thanks. I'm trying rebuilding singular and readline to see what the
real cause
The readline problem can be worked around by copying the system version of
libreadline to $SAGE_ROOT$/local/lib/. Well, at least it worked on my
machine.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jason Grout
> > wrote:
> >>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 3:53 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 12, 8:27 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
>
>> > Most of the problems in Sage are not at the shell level.
>>
>> Yes, but the problems that have been discussed so far in this thread
>>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 4:16 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
>
>
>
> On Oct 13, 9:28 am, Christian Hilberg wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm experiencing instruction set issues with the SAGe Linux i686
>> binary tarball from
>>
>> http://mirror.switch.ch/mirror/sagemath/linux/32bit/\
>> sage-4.1.1-linux-Debian_GN
>> Can you please kill your build. I'm sure whatever problem happened with
>> readline (or whatever) can be easily fixed.
>>
>
>
> Actually, it died on its own, apparently:
No worries -- I actually got impatient and killed it.
William
>
>
>
> mv -f .deps/sig-check.Tpo .deps/sig-check.Plo
> /bi
On Oct 13, 10:12 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Hello all
>
> This is for developers interested in Calculus.
>
> Since the patch for #385 is available and seems to work for me, I
> finished my work on #6479
>
> You have to use 2 patches from #6479 and one patch from #385
>
> After this we have
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
wrote:
>
> Dear David, dear Javier, dear category fans,
>
> Yippee! the technical patches required by the category code are making
> their way into Sage, maybe even in 4.1.2.
Since I just finished build testing 4.1.2 on a million machines
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jason Grout
>>> wrote:
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> I have found having the up-to-date a
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jason Grout
>> wrote:
>>> William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> I have found having the up-to-date alpha/rc on alpha.sagenb.org to
William Stein wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
>> William Stein wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Jason Grout
>>> wrote:
I have found having the up-to-date alpha/rc on alpha.sagenb.org to be
extremely handy for testing to see if a certain patch
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:45 AM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> kcrisman wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Oct 13, 1:39 am, Rob Beezer wrote:
>>> On Oct 12, 5:29 pm, William Stein wrote:
>>>
Maybe we should throw together a Sage Days-style coding sprint? Sage
Days 18.5. We would just need a list of all S
On 13 říj, 16:08, rjf wrote:
> Is x^2+3 free of x^6?
> Ordinarily I would think that if E is free of v, then one could vary v
> in any way, and not affect the value of E.
> If one varies x^6, it is kind of difficult to keep x^2+3 constant.
>
> I suppose you could specify a program to search i
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> last night I got a real headache with "sage -sh" not just prepending to
> my current path but rather resetting it... Anyway, I looked into sage
> and sage-sage and sage-env and then wondered why in sage-env there
> appears somet
Hello all
This is for developers interested in Calculus.
Since the patch for #385 is available and seems to work for me, I
finished my work on #6479
You have to use 2 patches from #6479 and one patch from #385
After this we have the following enhancements in Sage:
* Fixed #6479 (bad solution
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
