On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 11:36:00AM -0700, Nathann Cohen wrote:
>
> hmmm In everything I read, there are just mentions of out-
> neighbors and in-neighbors. I can give you a hundred references using
> these names,
Yup.
> and I would be much more alarmed to give you one reference using
> pre
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I tried to subscribe to the numpy discussion list at
>
> http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
>
> but the server is down.
>
> Likewise for the projects homepage. It's somewhat difficult to know
> where to report this.
>
> Perhaps if William or
I tried to subscribe to the numpy discussion list at
http://projects.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
but the server is down.
Likewise for the projects homepage. It's somewhat difficult to know
where to report this.
Perhaps if William or someone knows the email addresses of one of
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
> I've just tried the patch at
>
> http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6788
>
> It does not appear to have solved my problem, but it highlights one that
> has bugged me for some time - one where running doctests can bring the
> machine to an almost standstill.
I did n
Thanks, thats incredibly fast. I have now error when trying to
download the patch. I'll try it as soon as possible.
The last version od desolvers.py is
http://user.mendelu.cz/marik/temp/desolvers.py
Robert M.
On 9 říj, 18:25, kcrisman wrote:
> See patch at #385. Can you test it with your new
On Oct 9, 10:24 pm, Marshall Hampton wrote:
> One alternative would be to patch the test_Wise.py file so that
> instead of
>
> self.assert_(sys.stdout.getvalue().startswith("dnal -kbyte 10
> seq1.fna seq2.fna"))
>
> within test_dnal we'd have
>
> self.assert_(sys.stdout.getvalue().startswit
One alternative would be to patch the test_Wise.py file so that
instead of
self.assert_(sys.stdout.getvalue().startswith("dnal -kbyte 10
seq1.fna seq2.fna"))
within test_dnal we'd have
self.assert_(sys.stdout.getvalue().startswith("dnal -kbyte 10")
and similarly for test_psw. That wou
hmmm In everything I read, there are just mentions of out-
neighbors and in-neighbors. I can give you a hundred references using
these names, and I would be much more alarmed to give you one
reference using predecessors and successors...
Especially when for edges, you can type out and in to k
On Oct 9, 2009, at 9:55 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> Rob Beezer wrote:
>>> I'm able to log-in to Trac, but get
>>>
>>> Trac detected an internal error:
>>> TimeoutError: Unable to get database connection within 20 seconds
>>>
>>> when I try to view a ticket. Sounds like Minh is
On Oct 9, 2009, at 7:11 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 07:03:29PM -0700, Tom Boothby wrote:
>> +1 to deprecation
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jason Grout > s...@creativetrax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Nathann Cohen wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
Following
Jason Grout wrote:
> Rob Beezer wrote:
>> I'm able to log-in to Trac, but get
>>
>> Trac detected an internal error:
>> TimeoutError: Unable to get database connection within 20 seconds
>>
>> when I try to view a ticket. Sounds like Minh is having a similar
>> problem.
>>
>> Rob
>
> I can see ti
Rob Beezer wrote:
> I'm able to log-in to Trac, but get
>
> Trac detected an internal error:
> TimeoutError: Unable to get database connection within 20 seconds
>
> when I try to view a ticket. Sounds like Minh is having a similar
> problem.
>
> Rob
I can see tickets okay, but it's taking aro
On Oct 9, 9:26 am, kcrisman wrote:
> On Oct 9, 7:46 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello,
>
> > trying to fix desolve_laplace as described
> > athttp://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/b6f6b...
>
> > It is continuation of tickethttp://trac.sagemath.org/sag
Hi all,
I am playing around with the new biopython spkg (1.52). In particular,
I would like to have a spkg-check script to run the included tests.
This mostly works and the test skips testing modules that are not
installed. I am having one problem however. I get a failure with one
test.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 12:25:54AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> > Robert: What's your time line for:
> > - the review of categories-fixsagelib-nt.patch
> > - finalizing #5597 [with patch, needs work] rename coercion action
> > methods
>
> Rebased, has doctests, needs review.
Yep. Will rev
I'm able to log-in to Trac, but get
Trac detected an internal error:
TimeoutError: Unable to get database connection within 20 seconds
when I try to view a ticket. Sounds like Minh is having a similar
problem.
Rob
On Oct 8, 8:49 pm, William Stein wrote:
> OK, everything is done. Please repo
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 07:03:29PM -0700, Tom Boothby wrote:
> +1 to deprecation
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Jason Grout
> wrote:
> >
> > Nathann Cohen wrote:
> >> Hello everybody !!!
> >>
> >> Following
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/bfeb9b1828a0435
kcrisman wrote:
>
> I have to say, this output is not trivial to understand, though.
> - kcrisman
It takes a bit of reading and putting things together to understand it,
but it is the definitive answer to the question:
"Where can i dig out the string which actually is passed to Maxima?"
(tho
On Oct 9, 7:46 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> trying to fix desolve_laplace as described
> athttp://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/b6f6b...
>
> It is continuation of tickethttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6479
> which has been (hope) solved.
>
> T
On Oct 9, 7:13 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> > I was not able to find these informations in documentation. Should
> > this be documented? Or is this trivial thing for skilled programers in
> > Python?
>
> It should probably be documented somewhere (I don't know if it is).
Hello,
trying to fix desolve_laplace as described at
http://groups.google.cz/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/b6f6b6f056e80149/e2c0cf18cce9926c
It is continuation of ticket http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6479
which has been (hope) solved.
The temporary code is http://user.mend
ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> I was not able to find these informations in documentation. Should
> this be documented? Or is this trivial thing for skilled programers in
> Python?
It should probably be documented somewhere (I don't know if it is).
A google search for "sage log pexpect" yields t
On Sep 16, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
> Dear category fans,
>
> Thanks to Florent (and previous work by Anne, Jason, Franco, ...) all
> the sage-combinat related categories have a positive review. There
> remains just the mostly trivial categories listed below which would
23 matches
Mail list logo