Hi,
1. I rsynced all the servers from the old sagemath to the new virtual
machine. If you put a line like this in your /etc/hosts file
128.208.160.197 sagemath.org trac.sagemath.org cython.org # etc.
then you can see what the new website would look like if we switched
over now. Again, the s
Hello,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Simon King wrote:
> However, back to the question on pictures: I understood Robert's hint
> such that I do not need to explicitly produce (and save) a png. So, do
> I understand correctly that
> sage: show(B)
> will be a valuable doc test for an instance
> It does seem like the trac emails don't have the status in the subject;
> I don't know if this can be fixed.
>
That would be helpful.
> In the reports, the status is usually listed as a separate column.
Unfortunately, it's not very highlighted, unlike the ticket # and the
title. Maybe all t
kcrisman wrote:
> One thing I really liked about the old workflow was that it was
> immediately obvious whether a ticket had a patch, positive review,
> etc., because it was there in the description, which is what I usually
> read. Also, in emails that immediately pops up, so I knew to read
> tho
One thing I really liked about the old workflow was that it was
immediately obvious whether a ticket had a patch, positive review,
etc., because it was there in the description, which is what I usually
read. Also, in emails that immediately pops up, so I knew to read
those emails first (and that
On Oct 7, 5:46 pm, William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>
> > I suggest that before we release 4.1.2, we delete this part of the
> > tutorial until the file is fixed. (Alternatively, we could delete 2/3
> > of the file, but that might make it a bit sh
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:39 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> As of version 4.1.2.alpha2, the Sage tutorial has a section containing
> a guided tour of graph theory in Sage. In principle, this is a good
> idea, but the execution is severely flawed: about 2/3 of the tour
> focuses on the methods "g.
As of version 4.1.2.alpha2, the Sage tutorial has a section containing
a guided tour of graph theory in Sage. In principle, this is a good
idea, but the execution is severely flawed: about 2/3 of the tour
focuses on the methods "g.max_matching()", "g.edge_coloring()", and
"g.vertex_coloring()".
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jeff Gilchrist wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:04 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> VirtualBox is vastly better, so after this change I'll be able to
>> configure these virtual machines with more cores, RAM, and managing
>> them will be much easier.
>
> That is go
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> There is no doubt that especially on Solaris, the Sun compilers are
> better than the GNU ones in terms of speed.
I automatically doubt sentences that being "there is no doubt", so I
tried searching for any articles with benchmarks comp
Dear John,
On 8 Okt., 01:01, John H Palmieri wrote:
> > Very good. So I just copy-and-past the output of the Sage command line
> > and don't worry about the picture, then.
>
> But please make sure that if you save a png, it gets saved to a
> temporary directory. See #7059 for a related issue.
On Oct 7, 1:58 pm, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Robert!
>
> On 7 Okt., 22:46, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>
> > You can still doctest it. In doctest mode, show() should just produce
> > a png (or something like that) but not pop it up.
>
> Very good. So I just copy-and-past the output of the Sage comma
Simon King wrote:
>
>
> On 7 Okt., 23:44, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
>> Thank you, I see the point of saving SAGE64 now.
>>
>> Does the same not apply to ALL other variables like CC, CXX,
>> SAGE_FORTRAN .. etc too? I believe I have screwed up builds by mixing
>> compilers.
>
> Wouldn't it make
There is no doubt that especially on Solaris, the Sun compilers are
better than the GNU ones in terms of speed.
Sun have an interesting tool called 'Cool Tools - GCC for Sun Systems'
http://cooltools.sunsource.net/gcc/porting.html
which has has a GNU interface (and so takes GNU options), but
Hello,
Tomorrow evening (Thursday, October 8, about 7pm Pacific time) I plan
to shut down the sagemath.org and sagenb.org virtual machines for
about 3 hours to move the virtual machines from VMware on
"mod.math.washington.edu" to VirtualBox on
"boxen.math.washington.edu". During this time the D
On 7 Okt., 23:44, "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote:
> Thank you, I see the point of saving SAGE64 now.
>
> Does the same not apply to ALL other variables like CC, CXX,
> SAGE_FORTRAN .. etc too? I believe I have screwed up builds by mixing
> compilers.
Wouldn't it make sense to create a file that stor
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
> wrote:
>> I can see the above file is called from sage-env, but I'm trying to work
>> out exactly that the aim of it is. Do we really need the script at all?
>>
>> It seems to do 3 things.
>>
>> 1) If SAGE64 is yes, it pri
Some minutes ago, access worked fine for me, but right now, all I get
after some waiting is:
502 proxy error
Proxy Error
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /sage_trac/ticket/
7115.
Reason: Error reading from
Hi Robert!
On 7 Okt., 22:46, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> You can still doctest it. In doctest mode, show() should just produce
> a png (or something like that) but not pop it up.
Very good. So I just copy-and-past the output of the Sage command line
and don't worry about the picture, then.
Than
On Oct 7, 11:56 am, Burcin Erocal wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:17:32 -0700
>
> William Stein wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:27 AM, John Cremona
> > wrote:
>
> > > Isn't the second of those weeks the week of the planned Sage Days in
> > > Leiden? Which will specialise in Number Theory?
On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have a class with a show() method. How can this be doc tested?
>
> If there is no reasonable way to doc test a show() method: What can
> one do that it does not count negatively for the doc test coverage?
You can still doctest it. In doct
Hi!
I have a class with a show() method. How can this be doc tested?
If there is no reasonable way to doc test a show() method: What can
one do that it does not count negatively for the doc test coverage?
Best regards,
Simon
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> I can see the above file is called from sage-env, but I'm trying to work
> out exactly that the aim of it is. Do we really need the script at all?
>
> It seems to do 3 things.
>
> 1) If SAGE64 is yes, it prints we are building 64-bit on
I can see the above file is called from sage-env, but I'm trying to work
out exactly that the aim of it is. Do we really need the script at all?
It seems to do 3 things.
1) If SAGE64 is yes, it prints we are building 64-bit on Solaris or OS X.
2) Creates a file called SAGE_LOCAL/lib/sage-64.tx
I was told by Bart de Smit that the dates were July 5-9. I am CC'ing
Bart so that he can confirm. This is not flexible since the Lorentz
Centre in Leiden is otherwise booked up.
If Bart confrims, then someone should correct the wiki page.
John
2009/10/7 Burcin Erocal :
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:17:32 -0700
> William Stein wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:27 AM, John Cremona
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Isn't the second of those weeks the week of the planned Sage Days in
>> > Leiden? Which will specialise in
On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 06:17:32 -0700
William Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:27 AM, John Cremona
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Isn't the second of those weeks the week of the planned Sage Days in
> > Leiden? Which will specialise in Number Theory?
> >
>
> Good point -- there were so many possible
As you know, I believe the current sage-env could do with a bit of
improving in places. William agrees with that too. I have updated it
and whilst I don't think its a good idea to print the following
out every time sage-env is run, it needs to be documented. One can
print it out easily, by changin
On Oct 7, 5:07 am, "ma...@mendelu.cz" wrote:
> On 7 říj, 10:53, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> > On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:40 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> > By insecure, I assume you mean it returns bogus answers?
>
> Yes, if we substitute initial conditions and solve for constants %k1,
> %k2, then
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 1:27 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> Isn't the second of those weeks the week of the planned Sage Days in
> Leiden? Which will specialise in Number Theory?
>
Good point -- there were so many possible dates for Leiden that what is
posted in various places (e.g., http://wiki.sa
Vincent Labrecque wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Vincent Labrecque wrote:
>>
>> And as I'm writing this, with regards to optimization flags, maybe the
>> sage build system should provide an abstraction over -On. As I'm
>> sure you know, these have widely differing behaviors across com
Vincent Labrecque wrote:
> And as I'm writing this, with regards to optimization flags, maybe the
> sage build system should provide an abstraction over -On. As I'm
> sure you know, these have widely differing behaviors across
> compilers. Sometimes -O3 will do nothing, sometimes it wil
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Vincent Labrecque <
vincent.labrec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Vincent Labrecque wrote:
>
>
> And as I'm writing this, with regards to optimization flags, maybe the sage
> build system should provide an abstraction over -On. As I'm sure yo
On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:54 AM, Vincent Labrecque wrote:
>
> And as I'm writing this, with regards to optimization flags, maybe
> the sage build system should provide an abstraction over -On. As
> I'm sure you know, these have widely differing behaviors across
> compilers. Sometimes -O3 will
On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:58 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 at 03:23AM -0700, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>> Is there not a way to invoke a bash script in such a way that it
>> can't change the invoking environment?
>
> You sound like you want the `env' command:
>
>env FOO=bar command arg
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 4:11 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>
> Looking in sage-env I see:
>
> if [ "$MKDIR" = "" ]; then
> MKDIR="mkdir"
> fi
>
> if [ "$CHMOD" = "" ]; then
> CHMOD="chmod"
> fi
>
> if [ "$TOUCH" = "" ]; then
> TOUCH="touch"
> fi
>
> if [ "$MV" != "" ]; then
> MM="$MV"
Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 at 03:25PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
>> With Winter approaching, I was looking for a way to heat my garage
>> somewhat to stop the water freezing. (There's a small room in the
>> garage, which has water)
>>
>> I thought running my HP C3600 HP-UX worksta
Looking in sage-env I see:
if [ "$MKDIR" = "" ]; then
MKDIR="mkdir"
fi
if [ "$CHMOD" = "" ]; then
CHMOD="chmod"
fi
if [ "$TOUCH" = "" ]; then
TOUCH="touch"
fi
if [ "$MV" != "" ]; then
MM="$MV"
fi
if [ "$CP" = "" ]; then
CP="cp"
fi
I'm wondering if this is really nec
On 7 říj, 10:53, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:40 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
>
> By insecure, I assume you mean it returns bogus answers?
Yes, if we substitute initial conditions and solve for constants %k1,
%k2, then
%k1, %k2 may depend on x and y and thus substitution into g
Hi!
On Oct 7, 5:18 am, William Cauchois wrote:
[...]
> - Mouse movement is erratic (I noticed that rotation would continue
> to follow my mouse even after I released the button).
One remark: It seems to me that it is intended behaviour.
I just noticed
- If you hover over an image for the firs
On Oct 7, 2009, at 1:40 AM, ma...@mendelu.cz wrote:
> Dear developers of Sage
>
> I'm working on trac http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6479
Thanks! We're really lacking in this area, and better exposing all
that maxima has to offer will be a large step forward.
> adn
> the foloowing
Dear developers of Sage
I'm working on trac http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6479 adn
the foloowing enahancements of desolve
* with parameter show_method=True Sage returns pair [solution, string
describing method (e.g. linear)]
* with parametr ode_contrib=True Sage tries to use ode2 firs
Isn't the second of those weeks the week of the planned Sage Days in
Leiden? Which will specialise in Number Theory?
John
2009/10/7 William Stein :
> Hi,
>
> MSRI has decided to generously fund and host a 2-week graduate student
> summer Sage Days workshop on some area of number theory this com
43 matches
Mail list logo
