[sage-devel] Re: Linear Programming -- First applications in Sage

Minh, thanks a lot for the detailed explaination. Maybe the problem is that i have to patch it against 4.1.1 rc1 instead of 4.1 ... On Aug 6, 10:54 pm, Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi Rado, > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Rado wrote: > > > r...@rado-desktop:~/sage-4.0.2/devel/sage-lp$ cat sage/numer

[sage-devel] Re: New ECL is released - a few issues to consider.

Robert Dodier wrote: > Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > >> I'm not a great user of CVS. Can you give me the command for getting >> that branch? > > cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@maxima.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/maxima > get -r RELEASE-5_19-BRANCH maxima > > grabs the branch version of the CVS module na

[sage-devel] Re: New ECL is released - a few issues to consider.

I have tagged version-5_19_0 in CVS and created tar.gz and rpms and uploaded them to SF. See: http://sourceforge.net/projects/maxima/files/ Likely there will be 5.19.1 and maybe .2 later this month. HTH Robert Dodier --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group,

[sage-devel] Re: New ECL is released - a few issues to consider.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I'm not a great user of CVS. Can you give me the command for getting > that branch? cvs -d :pserver:anonym...@maxima.cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/maxima get -r RELEASE-5_19-BRANCH maxima grabs the branch version of the CVS module named maxima (incidentally creating a n

[sage-devel] sage sprint at mathfest

Rob Beezer and I have been having a great time meeting with several people about Sage. Anybody at mathfest (ahem, boothby :) is welcome to join us for lunch. We're at Mill and 6th, 3 blocks south and 5 blocks west of the Marriott conference hotel. We'll be around until maybe 12:30, but send

[sage-devel] Re: New ECL is released - a few issues to consider.

Robert Dodier wrote: > Burcin Erocal wrote: > >> An spkg with the latest Maxima CVS would make it very easy to test what >> possible issues we'll face with the new release. A script to pull the >> code from the CVS, build it and install it into Sage would be even >> better. :) > > If someone is

[sage-devel] Re: New ECL is released - a few issues to consider.

Burcin Erocal wrote: > An spkg with the latest Maxima CVS would make it very easy to test what > possible issues we'll face with the new release. A script to pull the > code from the CVS, build it and install it into Sage would be even > better. :) If someone is going to pull from Maxima CVS, my

Fwd: [sage-devel] issue with OS X 10.5.8 (with solution?)

David, See below for some data related to allowed GCC versions. Basically, on OS X, "build 5465" is too old. This is the version I have on bsd.math.washington.edu, so I'll probably see the same problem as soon as I upgrade. I'll thus upgrade XCode as well there. William -- Forwarded

[sage-devel] issue with OS X 10.5.8 (with solution?)

In case anyone has the same problem: I just upgraded two Macs to OS X 10.5.8. On one of them, Sage built fine, but on the other, I got an error building Singular: g++ -O3 -g -fPIC -pipe -fno-implicit-templates -I. -I/Applications/ sage_builds/sage-4.1.1.rc0/local/include -I/Applications/sage_bui

[sage-devel] Re: Sage and medical imaging (i.e. pynifti) build problems

OK, thanks, I'll try to think about what the problem is. I won't have a lot of time for the next week, but hopefully after that I can work on a wider variety of machines. I'm going to re-cc this to sage-devel in the hopes that someone else might have some insight - I am not an expert on building

[sage-devel] Re: New ECL is released - a few issues to consider.

On Sat, 08 Aug 2009 10:48:01 +0100 "Dr. David Kirkby" wrote: > > I just got a note on the ECL list that a new ECL (9.8.1) has been > released. This should fix the Solaris issues for us. It will however > break Maxima, but there is a patch I can apply to Maxima. The patch > was developed again

[sage-devel] Question on partial derivative of "f(x, x)" w.r.t. "x"

Hi, If I compute partial derivative of f(x, x) w.r.t. x in Sage then I get - sage: f(x, x).diff(x) D[0](f)(x, x) + D[1](f)(x, x) - Now if I say "f(x, x) = x" then from the output above I would get "2". On the other hand, had I computed it directly, I would get "1" -- sage: (x).diff(

[sage-devel] Sage benchmark

Has anyone ever thought of developing a Sage benchmark, so allowing different hardware to be compared in running Sage? If people are setting up a Sage server, it would be sensible they have some idea of the performance of various hardware. Mathematica has one built in, which tests 15 things.

[sage-devel] Re: New ECL is released - a few issues to consider.

Dr. David Kirkby wrote: > I just got a note on the ECL list that a new ECL (9.8.1) has been > released. This should fix the Solaris issues for us. It will however > break Maxima, but there is a patch I can apply to Maxima. The patch was > developed against the latest CVS of Maxima, but I could

[sage-devel] New ECL is released - a few issues to consider.

I just got a note on the ECL list that a new ECL (9.8.1) has been released. This should fix the Solaris issues for us. It will however break Maxima, but there is a patch I can apply to Maxima. The patch was developed against the latest CVS of Maxima, but I could apply that. But a new Maxima is

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 4.1.1.rc2 released

Minh Nguyen wrote: > Hi folks, > > Sage 4.1.1.rc2 resolves issues caused by non-ASCII characters in a > patch at ticket #5793. So the only ticket that has been merged in this > release is > > #6674: Minh Van Nguyen: only use ASCII characters in patches [Reviewed > by Nathann Cohen, Alex Ghitza]