On Jun 8, 7:37 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> The latex() command does different things in the notebook and the
> command line.
>
> Command line:
>
> sage: var('a, b, c')
> (a, b, c)
> sage: eqn = [a+b*c==1, b-a*c==0, a+b==5]
> sage: s = solve(eqn, a,b ,c)
> sage: latex(s[0])
>
>
Rob Beezer wrote:
> Currently, eigenspaces of graphs are computed by constructing the
> adjacency matrix, then converting to a matrix over RDF, and finally
> computing the eigenspaces of this matrix. When the graph has integer
> eigenvalues of high multiplicity, numerical inaccuracy is leading to
The latex() command does different things in the notebook and the
command line.
Command line:
sage: var('a, b, c')
(a, b, c)
sage: eqn = [a+b*c==1, b-a*c==0, a+b==5]
sage: s = solve(eqn, a,b ,c)
sage: latex(s[0])
\left[a = \frac{{(\left(25 I\right) \, \sqrt{79} + 25)}}{
Currently, eigenspaces of graphs are computed by constructing the
adjacency matrix, then converting to a matrix over RDF, and finally
computing the eigenspaces of this matrix. When the graph has integer
eigenvalues of high multiplicity, numerical inaccuracy is leading to
many one-dimensional eige
2009/6/8 davidloeffler :
>
> On Jun 8, 1:05 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, if you do "sage -upgrade" again, does it build
>> the documentation yet again?
>>
>> William
>
> Yes, it does.
So I guess the fix will be to modify the file spkg/install. Right now
it has these lines:
2009/6/8 Nicolas M. Thiery :
>
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:32:34AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:35 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Come on, guys; is it really so hard to run "sage -docbuild reference
>> >> > html" and check the output before you submit (or give a p
Today I first heard about mlabwrap. It's something like the rpy python
module (included in sage) for wrapping R, but for matlab. It makes
working with matlab in python (i.e. converting to numpy
datastructures) easier. Maybe useful for sage? Has anybody experience
with it?
The survey from last fall
On Jun 8, 6:20 pm, Nick Alexander wrote:
> * I want these amazing interact examples to be included in the sage
> library, as incredibly cool building blocks for future interacts.
>
i could think of something like
interact_plot( | | ...)
that presents an interface, min to max value, color,
t
Hi Pablo,
Pablo De Napoli wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm thinking about presenting a talk on Sage on the next "Python
> Argentina 2009" conference
> which will be held in Buenos Aires on next September. and is
> organized by Pyar (the Python user group of
> Argentina, http://python.org.ar/pyar/)
>
> (If
Hi,
I'm thinking about presenting a talk on Sage on the next "Python
Argentina 2009" conference
which will be held in Buenos Aires on next September. and is
organized by Pyar (the Python user group of
Argentina, http://python.org.ar/pyar/)
(If you can read Spanish, you can find the details abou
John H Palmieri wrote:
> On Jun 8, 8:42 am, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>> davidloeffler wrote:
>>> Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really nice
>>> if we could get rid of the insufferable "WARNING: html_favicon is not
>>> an .ico file" on building the documentation. Inspection
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 10:39:03AM +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Although, when I first saw Rng in Axiom, I didn't understand why the
> programmers used something that looked like an abbreviation. But, in
> fact, I somehow like that name. It makes it pretty obvious that the
> 'identity' is some
On Jun 8, 8:42 am, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
> davidloeffler wrote:
> > Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really nice
> > if we could get rid of the insufferable "WARNING: html_favicon is not
> > an .ico file" on building the documentation. Inspection reveals that
> > the favic
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Rado wrote:
>
>>
>> XX. Coding Theory
>>
>> * Algebraic-Geometric codes -- I'm sure we're missing a lot
>>
>> PROJECT: Implement standard range of AG codes. Requires more
>> algebraic curve functionality, some of which isn't available in the
>> open source world
William Stein wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:35 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Come on, guys; is it really so hard to run "sage -docbuild reference
html" and check the output before you submit (or give a positive
review to) a patch?
\end{grumble}
>>> I've added this to the patch revie
Nick Alexander wrote:
> Many of you know that I am, let's say, committed to emacs, and
> certainly not a big fan of the notebook. However... it does do at
> least one thing really well, and that is @interact.
At first, I thought you were announcing interacts for your emacs mode!
These ar
On Jun 8, 8:56 am, Nick Alexander wrote:
> On 8-Jun-09, at 8:42 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
>
>
> > davidloeffler wrote:
> >> Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really
> >> nice
> >> if we could get rid of the insufferable "WARNING: html_favicon is not
> >> an .ico file"
>
> XX. Coding Theory
>
> * Algebraic-Geometric codes -- I'm sure we're missing a lot
>
> PROJECT: Implement standard range of AG codes. Requires more
> algebraic curve functionality, some of which isn't available in the
> open source world.
My advisor, Prof. Iwan Duursma, and I are using pyth
William Stein wrote:
> The justification for the existence of "./sage -sh" is that you can
> type "exit" to get out of that subshell, and all the Sage environment
> variables are no longer defined. Also, on some systems "./sage -sh"
> changes the prompt as a reminder (it's a bug that it doesn't
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:32:34AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>> There's interest in creating a function in Sage that will apply the
>> patches from a given trac ticket, run all tests, verify that the docs
>> don't break, and report the result. The idea is that this
On Tue, Jun 02, 2009 at 10:32:34AM -0700, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 8:35 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> >
> >> > Come on, guys; is it really so hard to run "sage -docbuild reference
> >> > html" and check the output before you submit (or give a positive
> >> > review to) a patch?
>
Many of you know that I am, let's say, committed to emacs, and
certainly not a big fan of the notebook. However... it does do at
least one thing really well, and that is @interact.
I am writing code to numerically compute period matrices for Riemann
surfaces, and the first step includes a
On 8-Jun-09, at 8:42 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
>
> davidloeffler wrote:
>> Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really
>> nice
>> if we could get rid of the insufferable "WARNING: html_favicon is not
>> an .ico file" on building the documentation. Inspection reveals that
>>
davidloeffler wrote:
> Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really nice
> if we could get rid of the insufferable "WARNING: html_favicon is not
> an .ico file" on building the documentation. Inspection reveals that
> the favicon is set to "output/html/en/blah/_static/sageicon
Hi
On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 05:34:33PM +0200, Jaap Spies wrote:
> Not the wrong thing, but not what you expected :)
doh!
I will keep the assumptions in check next time.
Jan
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
Jan Groenewald wrote:
> Hi
>
> sage -upgrade from 3.4.2 to 4.0.1
>
> http://www.sagemath.org//spkg/standard/atlas-3.8.3.p3.spkg -->
> atlas-3.8.3.p3.spkg
> [..]
> Deleting old spkg atlas-3.8.3.p1.spkg
>
This is the expected behaviour. From the r
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 at 07:59AM -0400, William Stein wrote:
> If it hasn't already happened, it would be helpful if you guys made
> trac tickets for both of the above items, and posted the numbers here.
> Even though doing them is easy for the release manager, it is good to
> keep trac of the issue
Hi
sage -upgrade from 3.4.2 to 4.0.1
http://www.sagemath.org//spkg/standard/atlas-3.8.3.p3.spkg -->
atlas-3.8.3.p3.spkg
[..]
Deleting old spkg atlas-3.8.3.p1.spkg
All the SPKGes do this.
NEW -> NEW
..
deleting OLD
instead of
OLD -
On Jun 8, 1:05 pm, William Stein wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, if you do "sage -upgrade" again, does it build
> the documentation yet again?
>
> William
Yes, it does.
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
Jason Grout wrote:
> Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>>> ghtdak wrote:
On Jun 7, 11:29 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
>> setup.py is pulled directly from the cython tutorial docs:
>> tar...@puget:$ cat setup.py
>> from distut
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:28 AM, daveloeffler wrote:
>
> I just tried to upgrade from Sage 4.0.1.rc2 to the final 4.0.1, and it
> downloaded the changed packages fine, built everything fine, built the
> documentation ... and then built the documentation again! This is
> deeply tedious as building t
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 at 03:24AM -0700, davidloeffler wrote:
>> Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really nice
>> if we could get rid of the insufferable "WARNING: html_favicon is not
>> an .ico file" on building the document
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> ghtdak wrote:
>>> On Jun 7, 11:29 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> setup.py is pulled directly from the cython tutorial docs:
> tar...@puget:$ cat setup.py
> from distutils.core import setup
> f
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
> Jason Grout wrote:
>> ghtdak wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jun 7, 11:29 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>>> wrote:
Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> setup.py is pulled directly from the cython tutorial docs:
> tar...@puget:$ cat setup.py
> from distutils.core import setup
>>>
Jason Grout wrote:
> ghtdak wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 7, 11:29 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
>> wrote:
>>> Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
setup.py is pulled directly from the cython tutorial docs:
tar...@puget:$ cat setup.py
from distutils.core import setup
from distutils.extension import Exte
ghtdak wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 7, 11:29 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
> wrote:
>> Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
>>> setup.py is pulled directly from the cython tutorial docs:
>>> tar...@puget:$ cat setup.py
>>> from distutils.core import setup
>>> from distutils.extension import Extension
>>> from Cython.Dis
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 at 03:24AM -0700, davidloeffler wrote:
> Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really nice
> if we could get rid of the insufferable "WARNING: html_favicon is not
> an .ico file" on building the documentation. Inspection reveals that
> the favicon is set to
I just tried to upgrade from Sage 4.0.1.rc2 to the final 4.0.1, and it
downloaded the changed packages fine, built everything fine, built the
documentation ... and then built the documentation again! This is
deeply tedious as building the reference manual is very time-
consuming.
I've seen this b
Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really nice
if we could get rid of the insufferable "WARNING: html_favicon is not
an .ico file" on building the documentation. Inspection reveals that
the favicon is set to "output/html/en/blah/_static/sageicon.png",
which is not an .ico f
On Monday 08 June 2009, Tom Boothby wrote:
> I'd like to point out that Mike Hansen has been doing some work on
> rewriting the notebook. It'd be good to get his input on whatever you
> do
I was just wondering the same thing, Mike do you have any input how orthogonal
Yoav's project is to your r
On Jun 7, 11:29 am, Dag Sverre Seljebotn
wrote:
> Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> > setup.py is pulled directly from the cython tutorial docs:
>
> > tar...@puget:$ cat setup.py
> > from distutils.core import setup
> > from distutils.extension import Extension
> > from Cython.Distutils import build_e
41 matches
Mail list logo
