>XIV. Commutative Algebra
>
> * Modules over multivariate rings. This is a big Gap in
> functionality in Sage; presumably Singular can help fill it in?
>
>PROJECT: If Singular can do this well, wrap it. If not, consider
>Macaulay 2 which certainly can.
Actually, you have already wrapped
Hi everyone,
Craig Citro and I (Nick Alexander) are your humble release managers
for this iteration, sage-4.0.2.
The plan is to cut a release candidate Friday, June 12, probably
evening PST. The release itself will be Saturday, June 13. Hopefully
Minh will update the release notes and Ha
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:02 PM, Tom Boothby wrote:
> I'd like to point out that Mike Hansen has been doing some work on
> rewriting the notebook. It'd be good to get his input on whatever you
> do -- and perhaps you could help out with his rewrite
> since he's now busy doing release management.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 9:19 PM, ghtdak wrote:
>
>
>
> On Jun 7, 9:09 am, Craig Citro wrote:
>> > Trying an equivalent Cython NumPy test file yields the following error:
>>
>> > tar...@tarbox-laptop:$ python setup.py build_ext --inplace
>>
>> Just to confirm here: are you running from a sage shell
On Jun 7, 9:09 am, Craig Citro wrote:
> > Trying an equivalent Cython NumPy test file yields the following error:
>
> > tar...@tarbox-laptop:$ python setup.py build_ext --inplace
>
> Just to confirm here: are you running from a sage shell (i.e. by
> running sage -sh)? Otherwise my first thought
I'd like to point out that Mike Hansen has been doing some work on
rewriting the notebook. It'd be good to get his input on whatever you
do -- and perhaps you could help out with his rewrite since he's now
busy doing release management.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:18 AM, Yoav Aner wrote:
>
> Hello
As some of you know, I downloaded the Solaris toochain and managed to
build sage on my Blade 2000. But Sage will not build on
t2.math.washington.edu, due to a problem with gfortran.
The Blade 2500 on which the toolchain ws build is quite a similar
machine to my Blade 2000, but t2 is quite diff
On 7 Jun 2009, at 12:44, Kevin Horton wrote:
>
> Arrgh. This was actually on ubuntu 8.10. The machine with ubuntu
> 9.04 is still working its way through its tests.
>
> I've renamed the log to:
>
> http://www.kilohotel.com/misc/testlong_sage-4.0.1-Ubuntu_8.10.log.gz
>
> Sorry about the confusio
Glenn Tarbox, PhD wrote:
> setup.py is pulled directly from the cython tutorial docs:
>
> tar...@puget:$ cat setup.py
> from distutils.core import setup
> from distutils.extension import Extension
> from Cython.Distutils import build_ext
>
> setup(
> cmdclass = {'build_ext': build_ext},
>
On 6 Jun 2009, at 15:40, William Stein wrote:
> Sage-4.0.1 has been released (by William Stein and Mike Hansen). You
> can download it from
>
All tests passed on Eee PC 901 with Atom N270 CPU running Ubuntu 9.04.
--
Kevin Horton
Ottawa, Canada
--~--~-~--~~~---~-
2009/6/7 Martin Albrecht :
>
> On Saturday 06 June 2009, William Stein wrote:
>> Hi Sage Devel,
>>
>> Now that sage-4.0.1 has been released (13 hours ahead of schedule, and
>> on budget!), it's time for the *community* to work on planning the
>> next Sage release.
>>
>> To get things going, here a
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:31 AM, Yoav Aner wrote:
> I'm guessing the answer is no, but are there any high or lower level
> diagrams to help understand the architecture (e.g. server pool
> processes, OS processes, web front-end and their interfaces etc, how
> it all sits together)?
No.
> I mean o
Thank you for useful points / comments and for the pointers to how
sage works in particular. I certainly have more information to get
started now, though I'm sure I'll end up with more questions sooner or
later...
I'm guessing the answer is no, but are there any high or lower level
diagrams to he
Arrgh. This was actually on ubuntu 8.10. The machine with ubuntu
9.04 is still working its way through its tests.
I've renamed the log to:
http://www.kilohotel.com/misc/testlong_sage-4.0.1-Ubuntu_8.10.log.gz
Sorry about the confusion.
Kevin Horton
On 7 Jun 2009, at 08:21, Kevin Horton w
> Trying an equivalent Cython NumPy test file yields the following error:
>
>
>
> tar...@tarbox-laptop:$ python setup.py build_ext --inplace
>
Just to confirm here: are you running from a sage shell (i.e. by
running sage -sh)? Otherwise my first thought
Hi,
By the way, for the impatient, binaries are appearing here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/incoming/
as they get made.
William
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:01 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>
>
>
>>> All tests passed on sage.ma
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 1:01 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> All tests passed on sage.math, except for the following:
>>
>> [mv...@sage sage-4.0.1]$ sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/interfaces/psage.py
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/usr/local/sage/local/bin/sage-test", line 49, in
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:40 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sage-4.0.1 has been released (by William Stein and Mike Hansen). You
>> can download it from
>>
>> http://sagemath.org/src/
>>
>> as usual. I'm building binaries right now
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:40 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sage-4.0.1 has been released (by William Stein and Mike Hansen). You
> can download it from
>
> http://sagemath.org/src/
>
> as usual. I'm building binaries right now too (which should work on a
> wider range of processors, by the
This has become a two part question / issue:
- The use of Cython / Numpy in the notebook
- The use of Cython / Numpy on the command line
Cython itself seems to work fine with the "Hello World" example, so the core
installation is consistent with the base cython package (at least with my
adm
I did a "make testlong" with sage 4.0.1 on ubuntu 9.04, and got a
large number of failures. Many (all?) of the failures are with
singular. Full log at:
http://www.kilohotel.com/misc/testlong_sage-4.0.1-Ubuntu_9.04.log.gz
The following tests failed:
sage -t -long "devel/sage/sage/s
On Saturday 06 June 2009, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage Devel,
>
> Now that sage-4.0.1 has been released (13 hours ahead of schedule, and
> on budget!), it's time for the *community* to work on planning the
> next Sage release.
>
> To get things going, here are some questions.
>
> Should it be a
22 matches
Mail list logo
