On Tue, 12 May 2009 at 05:05PM -0700, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes,
> depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much
> like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great
> to edit the doctest
> Yippee! All of those are serious time savers! Thanks!
>
>> Beta testers, please let me know what problems you have.
>> I felt like I added a lot of requested features this iteration, so
>> keep them coming.
>
> I will :-)
>
> An to start with:
>
> - C-C C-j seems to get confused by tabs in the i
Jason Grout wrote:
> Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>>
>> - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes,
>>depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much
>>like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great
>>to edit the doctests in
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
>
>
> - Is there general support in emacs for switching between two modes,
>depending on whether one is in the code or in comments? I very much
>like the rst-mode of emacs, and in the long run it would be great
>to edit the doctests in rst-mode and the code
2009/5/11 mabshoff :
>
> Ok, no 4.0.a0 yet, but it should drop fairly soon. An update of what
> is going on:
>
> * 75% coverage - we are already close at 74.4% or so and the pynac
> symbolics switch will get us past 75%. There is also a bunch of code
> in trac that should increase coverage even f
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:22:32PM -0700, Nick Alexander wrote:
>
> I am pleased to announce the release of sage-mode-0.6, the all-
> singing, all-dancing sage development Emacs environment. As always,
> you can get it from http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-mode. But now...
> it's in the optio
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 5:29 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this isn't against David, it just annoys me to no end that people do
> this: This has come up before, but I consider it *completely useless*
> when someone opens a page named
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/extra%20documentation%20%28for%
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 2:29 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> this isn't against David, it just annoys me to no end that people do
> this: This has come up before, but I consider it *completely useless*
> when someone opens a page named
>
> http://wiki.sagemath.org/extra%20documentation%20%28for%
Hi,
this isn't against David, it just annoys me to no end that people do
this: This has come up before, but I consider it *completely useless*
when someone opens a page named
http://wiki.sagemath.org/extra%20documentation%20%28for%20the%20standard%20components%20of%20SAGE%29
since no one can
On May 12, 10:37 am, William Stein wrote:
> 2009/5/12 mabshoff :
> I can resolve the failure in gen.pyx easily: Just completely delete
> the finitefield_init function!
Well, nuking functionality is always a solution ;)
> This pari function has always been
> flakie, IMHO, and is used n
2009/5/12 mabshoff :
>
> Hello folks,
>
> due to Martin Albrecht tracking down the evasive libSingular issue
> (turns out it was a linker oddity due to static libs being linked
> multiple times into an extension in case you care) I have build a
> 3.4.2 binary with various fixes and posted it at
>
On 12-May-09, at 7:56 AM, Florent Hivert wrote:
>
> Dear William,
>
>> FreeAlgebraElement was written in 2005, and nobody has worked on it
>> since.
>> Maybe now it is your turn.
>
> Or my student's :). That was my intention ! The obvious question is
> now the
> naming convention. It se
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
>
> Dear William,
>
>> FreeAlgebraElement was written in 2005, and nobody has worked on it since.
>> Maybe now it is your turn.
>
> Or my student's :). That was my intention ! The obvious question is now the
> naming convention. It seems
Dear William,
> FreeAlgebraElement was written in 2005, and nobody has worked on it since.
> Maybe now it is your turn.
Or my student's :). That was my intention ! The obvious question is now the
naming convention. It seems to me that we should stick as close as possible to
polynomials:
s
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Florent Hivert
wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> It seems that FreeAlgebraElement is missing some accessors:
> It is very easy to create elements:
> sage: sage: A.=FreeAlgebra(ZZ,3)
> sage: bla = -x+3*y*z
> sage: bla
> -x + 3*y*z
> but I can't find any wa
Dear All,
It seems that FreeAlgebraElement is missing some accessors:
It is very easy to create elements:
sage: sage: A.=FreeAlgebra(ZZ,3)
sage: bla = -x+3*y*z
sage: bla
-x + 3*y*z
but I can't find any way to get some information on an element (except for
printing it of cour
Hello folks,
due to Martin Albrecht tracking down the evasive libSingular issue
(turns out it was a linker oddity due to static libs being linked
multiple times into an extension in case you care) I have build a
3.4.2 binary with various fixes and posted it at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/
17 matches
Mail list logo
