Hi Martin!
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:35:22AM +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
> "Nicolas M. Thiery" writes:
> > Just a short question: does the interpreter handle transitivity:
> > i.e. if there is a coercion A -> B and one B -> C, then deduce one for
> > A -> C?
>
> I just realized that you
David - thanks for the reply, and especially for the reminder to not
forget about R.
Ahmed - I'd like to use your application in the review. I'll contact
you off-list right now for more, but if you miss that, please be back
in contact.
Fredrik - glad we could help make your day. ;-)
More cont
On Mar 16, 7:27 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 at 07:13PM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote:
> > If I do search_doc("orbit") in sage 3.4 (in the notebook), I get
> > (amongst others) a link:
>
> >https://localhost:8000/doc/live/html/en/reference/genindex-F.html
>
> > which leads to a "resource
Since this concerns a communication protocol between
GAP and Maple (and KANT and some others), I thought
some people on this list might find this interesting.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dan Roozemond
Date: Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:18 PM
Subject: [Om] Announcement: Java Library
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 at 07:13PM -0700, Nils Bruin wrote:
> If I do search_doc("orbit") in sage 3.4 (in the notebook), I get
> (amongst others) a link:
>
> https://localhost:8000/doc/live/html/en/reference/genindex-F.html
>
> which leads to a "resource cannot be found". The appropriate link
> seems
If I do search_doc("orbit") in sage 3.4 (in the notebook), I get
(amongst others) a link:
https://localhost:8000/doc/live/html/en/reference/genindex-F.html
which leads to a "resource cannot be found". The appropriate link
seems to be
https://localhost:8000/doc/live/reference/genindex-F.html
It
> Sorry for the self reply, amend that second example to clarify my intent:
> sage: f=1
> sage: # many lines of code
> sage: integrate(f) # what does this mean?
> ...
> sage: integrate(f,x)
> x
>
> Perhaps I should also say that I actually found the original versions of plot
> outright confusing
What on earth is that function is_primitive() doing there? If you
asked me to define what it means for a univariate polynomial over a
ring to be primitive then I would say that it means that the
coefficients generate the unit ideal.
The function there seems to be a different concept only relevan
On Mar 16, 1:43 pm, davidloeffler wrote:
Hi David,
> I also came across the problem with quaternion_order_ideal.py, but for
> me it went away when I re-built from a clean tarball (rather than
> upgrading from 3.4.rc0 as I had done before). But even the final 3.4
> tarball generates some Sphin
Hi there,
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/5535
adds a neat way of shooting yourself in the foot in the name of performance,
so I wonder if anyone has any hard feelings about that? I suggested to
include this in Sage (Ryan had a local version for his application), so I
think it is
On Mar 16, 2009, at 9:47 AM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:19 AM, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar
> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Folks,
>>
>> I am working my way through the Sage 3.4 Tutorial from my local
>> copy of
>> it, with sage running in a terminal.
>>
>> I have encountered some pit
On Mar 14, 2009, at 6:29 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> It sounds like the problems is the known issue that numpy does not
> interact very well with Sage data types. Try this:
>
> from numpy import *
> import quantities as pq
> res = 10r*pq.ohm
>
> The 10r means to create a python integer, rather than
On Mar 15, 2009, at 7:29 PM, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Dom, 2009-03-15 às 17:11 -0700, kcrisman escreveu:
>>
>>> Wouldn't it be clearer if the error message read
>>>
>>> NameError: name 't' is not defined, try var('t') beforehand
>>>
>>> or something similar?
>>>
>>> Perhaps as Carl deprecates c
I also came across the problem with quaternion_order_ideal.py, but for
me it went away when I re-built from a clean tarball (rather than
upgrading from 3.4.rc0 as I had done before). But even the final 3.4
tarball generates some Sphinx error messages when you do a docbuild,
from some slightly mis-
Hi,
setuptools is part of standard sage.
Is it feasable to get setupdocs in?
Available Packages
Name : python-setupdocs
Arch : noarch
Version: 1.0.1
Release: 3.fc9
Size : 16 k
Repo : updates-newkey
Summary: Setuptools plugin
URL: http://pypi.python.or
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:37 PM, John Cremona wrote:
> I assumed that Stirling numbers would be in Sage as part of sage-combinat
> but it seems that we just wrap two GAP functions. Are we as fast as we
> could be? And does Neil Sloane read any of our lists as he clearly does
> pari-users?
Rela
I assumed that Stirling numbers would be in Sage as part of sage-combinat
but it seems that we just wrap two GAP functions. Are we as fast as we
could be? And does Neil Sloane read any of our lists as he clearly does
pari-users?
John
PS also tere's a typo in the docstring of stirling_number1().
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:51 AM, Joel B. Mohler wrote:
>
> On Monday 16 March 2009 12:27:10 pm kcrisman wrote:
>> sage: integrate(y^2)
>> ---
>> TypeError Traceback (most recent call
>> last)
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:03 PM, Joel B. Mohler wrote:
>
> On Monday 16 March 2009 02:51:30 pm Joel B. Mohler wrote:
>> On Monday 16 March 2009 12:27:10 pm kcrisman wrote:
>> > sage: integrate(y^2)
>> > -
>> >-- TypeError
On Monday 16 March 2009 02:51:30 pm Joel B. Mohler wrote:
> On Monday 16 March 2009 12:27:10 pm kcrisman wrote:
> > sage: integrate(y^2)
> > -
> >-- TypeError Traceback (most recent call
> > las
On Monday 16 March 2009 12:27:10 pm kcrisman wrote:
> sage: integrate(y^2)
> ---
> TypeError Traceback (most recent call
> last)
> TypeError: cannot coerce type ' 'sage.symbolic.expression.Expre
On Mar 16, 11:43 am, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> > It might be, but this is the error reported: "OSError: [Errno 24] Too
> > many open files"
>
> > Can you check with ulimit -a what your current limit is (it seems to
> > be 1024 on sage.math for example) and increase it and try again? The
> > sphin
> It might be, but this is the error reported: "OSError: [Errno 24] Too
> many open files"
>
> Can you check with ulimit -a what your current limit is (it seems to
> be 1024 on sage.math for example) and increase it and try again? The
> sphinx build works for me with 256 max open files on OSX, so
In fact my idea is a bit different, and I'll explain in a minute:
provided that the system is SI, you should get the result as a
multiplier (bigger than one) of the closest classic unit
representation
ex: meters -> nm - um - mm - m - km - ecc ecc
ex:
x1 = 10cm
x2 = 1m
x1 + x2 = 1.1m
y1 = 1V (Vol
On Mar 16, 11:25 am, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Hi
>
> > There is a quaternion_order.rst in devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
> > algebras that seems to be autogenerated.
>
> > After nuking the output directory rebuilding all documentation
> > repeatedly works.
>
> I tried this one... But on m
Hi
> There is a quaternion_order.rst in devel/sage/doc/en/reference/sage/
> algebras that seems to be autogenerated.
>
> After nuking the output directory rebuilding all documentation
> repeatedly works.
I tried this one... But on my computation server:
sage/algebras/steenrod_algebra_elem
On Mar 16, 11:08 am, Carl Witty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> > On Mar 16, 10:37 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
> >
>
> >> But strangely enough when I run the documentation build I run into the
> >> same issue you described. I am poking around to see what is
> >> happ
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:46 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mar 16, 10:37 am, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
>
>> But strangely enough when I run the documentation build I run into the
>> same issue you described. I am poking around to see what is
>> happening ...
>
> An observation:
>
> "
> pickling env
On Mar 16, 10:37 am, mabshoff wrote:
> But strangely enough when I run the documentation build I run into the
> same issue you described. I am poking around to see what is
> happening ...
An observation:
"
pickling environment... done
checking consistency... WARNING: /scratch/mabshoff/sage
On Mar 16, 10:30 am, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Dear Michael,
Hi Florent,
> > This issue was fixed in the final 3.4 tarball - you should check if
> > you have multiple heads in case you are truly running the final 3.4.
>
> Strange !!! My install is a brand new one from the following tar I
Dear Michael,
> On Mar 16, 8:09 am, Florent Hivert
> wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I've some trouble compiling the doc:
>
>
>
> > File "/usr/local/sage/sage/devel/sage/doc/common/builder.py", line 498,
> > in get_module_docstring_title
> > __import__(module_name)
> > Impo
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
>
> Greetings. This might not qualify as interesting or relevant, but for
> my own research, I wrote a Sage app to calculate via Monte Carlo
> approximation the Cramer-Rao bounds for estimating certain target
> parameters from synthetic aperture
On Mar 16, 9:53 am, William Stein wrote:
> Hi Sage-Devel,
>
> Here's yet *another* person that can't use our binary on OS X 10.4
> PPC. Michael, can you change the binary name to make it clear that it
> won't work?
I have removed both OSX 10.4 binaries from them mirror directory (they
are in
kcrisman wrote:
>
>>> I agree. As a member of the non-math-teacher part of this list, I must
>>> agree that plot(some_single_var_function_or_expression, 0, 1) should be
>>> considered as valid input.
>> The original proposal by Carl said this would work (see point 3).
>> (well, he had parentheses
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:04 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I'm worried when you say that the whole schemes directory is being
> "scrubbed", since this could either mean "thoroughly cleaned up to it
> is sparklingly clean and beautiful" or "deleted, erased completely" as
> in a well-used blackboard.
>
Hi Sage-Devel,
Here's yet *another* person that can't use our binary on OS X 10.4
PPC. Michael, can you change the binary name to make it clear that it
won't work?
Hi Tom,
Currently the only way to install sage-3.4 on a G4 is to upgrade an
existing install or build from source.
William
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 8:19 AM, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar
wrote:
>
> Dear Folks,
>
> I am working my way through the Sage 3.4 Tutorial from my local copy of
> it, with sage running in a terminal.
>
> I have encountered some pitfalls., some typographic errors, and some
> mystifying errors. I am c
On Mar 16, 8:09 am, Florent Hivert
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I've some trouble compiling the doc:
> File "/usr/local/sage/sage/devel/sage/doc/common/builder.py", line 498, in
> get_module_docstring_title
> __import__(module_name)
> ImportError: No module named quaternion_order
>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Ahmed Fasih wrote:
>
> Greetings. This might not qualify as interesting or relevant, but for
> my own research, I wrote a Sage app to calculate via Monte Carlo
> approximation the Cramer-Rao bounds for estimating certain target
> parameters from synthetic aperture
Greetings. This might not qualify as interesting or relevant, but for
my own research, I wrote a Sage app to calculate via Monte Carlo
approximation the Cramer-Rao bounds for estimating certain target
parameters from synthetic aperture radar data. MPMath's arbitrary-
precision float functionality
Thanks, Justin. I wish I could have been there!
John
2009/3/16 Justin Walker :
>
>
> On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:04 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm worried when you say that the whole schemes directory is being
>> "scrubbed", since this could either mean "thoroughly cleaned up to it
>> is sparkli
> > I agree. As a member of the non-math-teacher part of this list, I must
> > agree that plot(some_single_var_function_or_expression, 0, 1) should be
> > considered as valid input.
>
> The original proposal by Carl said this would work (see point 3).
> (well, he had parentheses around the range,
On Mar 16, 2009, at 3:04 AM, John Cremona wrote:
>
> I'm worried when you say that the whole schemes directory is being
> "scrubbed", since this could either mean "thoroughly cleaned up to it
> is sparklingly clean and beautiful" or "deleted, erased completely" as
> in a well-used blackboard.
>
Ronan Paixão wrote:
>
> I agree. As a member of the non-math-teacher part of this list, I must
> agree that plot(some_single_var_function_or_expression, 0, 1) should be
> considered as valid input.
The original proposal by Carl said this would work (see point 3).
(well, he had parentheses arou
Hi Alex,
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:04:37PM +1100, Alex Ghitza wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Minh Nguyen
>wrote:
>
> On the above site, I notice the following dot point:
>
> "credit: young people, publication record"
>
> I'm not sure why
Dear Folks,
I am working my way through the Sage 3.4 Tutorial from my local copy of
it, with sage running in a terminal.
I have encountered some pitfalls., some typographic errors, and some
mystifying errors. I am collating these into a text file. But before I
put in too much effort into it,
Dear All,
I've some trouble compiling the doc:
tomahawk-*e/sage-3.4/devel $ sage -clone doc
[...]
tomahawk-*e/sage-3.4/devel $ cd sage-doc
tomahawk-*4/devel/sage-doc $ sage -b doc
[...]
tomahawk-*4/devel/sage-doc $ sage -docbuild reference html
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
Maurizio wrote:
> Regarding the output of such expression you wrote, I agree that it
> should give a standard unit output for each physical quantity, so by
> presetting SI (or imperial, or anything else), it should give just
> meters (or feets, or anything else)...
I'm pretty sure that would cau
Maurizio wrote:
> Hi Fergus,
>
> thank you for your comments!
> So, do you consider working on a Quantity porting worthwhile? It seems
> that you got some good experience by working on it, so you can
> probably give some better advice about the structure of that package.
>
> Moreover, I'm wonder
> sage: K. = LaurentSeriesRing(QQ)
> sage: R. = PowerSeriesRing(QQ)
> 3. coercion to R does not work (R(u) fails trying to coerce to QQ).
I guess this is the same sort of problem as what I reported in trac
#5468.
chris.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this gro
Awesome! Looks like your patch is a little more comprehensive than
what I was planning, I might pick and choose a bit :-)
david
On Mar 15, 11:09 pm, Nick Alexander wrote:
> My wrapper that I never got around to submitting...
>
> Nick
>
> frobenius.py
> 10KViewDownload
>
>
>
> On 15-Mar-09, at
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
>
> Sage-Devel,
>
> I've been asked to write a review of Sage for SIAM Review, the main
> journal for the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. I'd
Great news!
> like to include some concrete examples of some fast and powerful
> co
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 2:30 AM, Burcin Erocal wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:04:37 +1100
> Alex Ghitza wrote:
>
>> A meta-comment: I basically just wrote down snippets of what people
>> were saying in that discussion. I will try to go through it and
>> expand a little bit. Also for
"Nicolas M. Thiery" writes:
> > > Do you foresee any occasion to meet physically all three of us?
> >
> > Well, at least two of us are at FPSAC 09 at RISC.
> >
> > (I love all these abbreviations, it feels so french :-)
>
> :-)
>
> > (3) The interpreter makes a heuristic choice which signatu
I'm worried when you say that the whole schemes directory is being
"scrubbed", since this could either mean "thoroughly cleaned up to it
is sparklingly clean and beautiful" or "deleted, erased completely" as
in a well-used blackboard.
I assume the former ;) but would appreciate it if some of the
What the code does is to assign PP to a suitable projective space. I
imagine that the intention was for the user to provide the ambient
space if they had it handy, so that assignment should be wrapped in
"if PP is None:".
John
2009/3/16 dmharvey :
>
> Hi,
>
> The constructor for hyperelliptic c
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:04:37 +1100
Alex Ghitza wrote:
> A meta-comment: I basically just wrote down snippets of what people
> were saying in that discussion. I will try to go through it and
> expand a little bit. Also for the technical parts (which are
> amenable to "send me a patch") I w
Hi Fergus,
thank you for your comments!
So, do you consider working on a Quantity porting worthwhile? It seems
that you got some good experience by working on it, so you can
probably give some better advice about the structure of that package.
Moreover, I'm wondering how much work would it requi
58 matches
Mail list logo
