On Jan 13, 2009, at 11:12 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> I've been working on trac #3941 trying to figure out a nice syntax for
> computing the total (matrix) derivative of a multivariable function
> (e.g., the Jacobian matrix and the Hessian matrix). Relevant
> discussion
> for the current diff beh
I've been working on trac #3941 trying to figure out a nice syntax for
computing the total (matrix) derivative of a multivariable function
(e.g., the Jacobian matrix and the Hessian matrix). Relevant discussion
for the current diff behavior is at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/brow
Hi Michael,
So the previous problem disappeared, but I ran into 2 more problems,
one of which is still unresolved.
It has been reported earlier that the fortran compiler that comes with
sage does not work well with Archlinux. The work-around the Archlinux
group used was to set 2 environmental var
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:47 PM, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 at 04:53AM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
>> > For what it's worth, I always use my system Mercurial.
>>
>> Why? Is the one we ship broken?
>
> No big reason. To use Sage's hg, I need to add something to my path, and
> since I have S
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 at 04:53AM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
> > For what it's worth, I always use my system Mercurial.
>
> Why? Is the one we ship broken?
No big reason. To use Sage's hg, I need to add something to my path, and
since I have Sage trees here and there, this is harder than doing
nothing a
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>>
>>
>> +1, that sounds like a very good idea. I'd imagine one could have a
>> fresh copy of sage, and just fork from there for every new doctest/
>> notebook session. (It would probably be a lot simpler, and still
>>
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
>
> +1, that sounds like a very good idea. I'd imagine one could have a
> fresh copy of sage, and just fork from there for every new doctest/
> notebook session. (It would probably be a lot simpler, and still
> scale much better, for the notebook to start an unused
On Jan 13, 6:29 pm, DavidS wrote:
> Hi Michael,
Hi David,
> I don't think libpari.so was ever built (I can only find the comments
> for libpari.a in install.log). Perhaps I fouled things up when I built
> the first few packages (including libpari.so) with icc and icpc. I had
> wanted to uploa
On Jan 13, 2009, at 6:04 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 13, 5:50 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Jason Grout wrote:
>
>
>
>>> I noticed that for my Sage server, each open worksheet took about
>>> 140MB
>>> of RAM. When I ran out of memory, the server froze and lots of
>>> errors
>>> happened. To
Hi Michael,
I don't think libpari.so was ever built (I can only find the comments
for libpari.a in install.log). Perhaps I fouled things up when I built
the first few packages (including libpari.so) with icc and icpc. I had
wanted to upload my log, but I managed to mess my install.log up while
tr
On 13 jan, 22:43, mabshoff wrote:
> A couple remarks:
>
> * spkgs usually install software into $SAGE_ROOT/local or in local/
> lib/python/site-packages (via standard distutils mechanism, i.e.
> "python setup.py install") and not into the Sage library and I would
> highly discourage anyone to
A couple remarks:
* spkgs usually install software into $SAGE_ROOT/local or in local/
lib/python/site-packages (via standard distutils mechanism, i.e.
"python setup.py install") and not into the Sage library and I would
highly discourage anyone to attempt to install into the Sage library
itself
Vincent Delecroix wrote:
>
>
> Jason was right : "I have some python code that creates some objects
> that are interesting to me; how do I get this into Sage
> permanently ?". I've aldready put my files in the $SAGE_ROOT/devel/
> sage/sage directory and I've done two modifications of the
> conf
On Jan 13, 2009, at 12:54 PM, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
>
> Jason was right : "I have some python code that creates some objects
> that are interesting to me; how do I get this into Sage
> permanently ?". I've aldready put my files in the $SAGE_ROOT/devel/
> sage/sage directory and I've done two mo
On 13 jan, 20:27, Jason Grout wrote:
> Simon King wrote:
> > Dear Vincent,
>
> > On Jan 13, 6:38 pm, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> I need objects in Sage that not yet totally exist (a combinatoric one,
> >> and another derived from oriented graph). So I write som
> * testing with FF 2.0.x on OSX
> * testing with Safari on 10.4
I have reviewed for Safari on 10.4 PPC, FF on 10.4 PPC (see ticket).
Safari looks good! But I have inexplicable, horrible, rendering bug
on FF 2.0.0.13 which is reproducible for me, but hopefully not for
anyone else.
-
> > 1. Implement a chdir() method for the Maple interface which changes
> > Maple's working directory and tell Maple's plot command always to
> > write to a gif in the working directory. I don't know if either of
> > these are doable from the Maple side.
>
> That seems like a good idea.
If it ma
Simon King wrote:
> Dear Vincent,
>
> On Jan 13, 6:38 pm, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I need objects in Sage that not yet totally exist (a combinatoric one,
>> and another derived from oriented graph). So I write some python files
>> (pure python for the moment) to c
Dear Vincent,
On Jan 13, 6:38 pm, Vincent Delecroix <20100.delecr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I need objects in Sage that not yet totally exist (a combinatoric one,
> and another derived from oriented graph). So I write some python files
> (pure python for the moment) to create those new objects. My p
On Jan 13, 2009, at 9:38 AM, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
> Hi sage-developers,
>
> I need objects in Sage that not yet totally exist (a combinatoric one,
> and another derived from oriented graph). So I write some python files
> (pure python for the moment) to create those new objects. My problem
>
On 13 jan, 18:46, "David Joyner" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Vincent Delecroix
>
> <20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi sage-developers,
>
> > I need objects in Sage that not yet totally exist (a combinatoric one,
> > and another derived from oriented graph). So I write some
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Vincent Delecroix
<20100.delecr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi sage-developers,
>
> I need objects in Sage that not yet totally exist (a combinatoric one,
> and another derived from oriented graph). So I write some python files
> (pure python for the moment) to creat
Hi sage-developers,
I need objects in Sage that not yet totally exist (a combinatoric one,
and another derived from oriented graph). So I write some python files
(pure python for the moment) to create those new objects. My problem
is that I didn't find any place on the web where it's said how to
mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> On Jan 8, 3:22 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
>> mabshoff wrote:
>>
>>> I think that the editor is just as important as the @interact in the
>>> notebook. So if we could find some more people to test the patches we
>>> can get them into the next release. As long as they don't brea
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
>
>> In particular the class
>>
>> cdef class Polynomial_zmod_flint(Polynomial_template):
>>
>> only has like 5 or 6 methods. Just make a version of this class that is
>>
>> cdef class Polynomial_zmod_flint_and_ntl(Polynomial_template):
>>
On Jan 12, 3:52 pm, mabshoff wrote:
> On Jan 12, 6:04 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
> wrote:
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> > > > Discussion about the usage of (lazy) attributes w.r.t
> > > > parameterless methods i.e. f.bla or f.bla()
> > > Well, one objection is that the lazy attributes don't work in Cython
> In particular the class
>
> cdef class Polynomial_zmod_flint(Polynomial_template):
>
> only has like 5 or 6 methods. Just make a version of this class that is
>
> cdef class Polynomial_zmod_flint_and_ntl(Polynomial_template):
>
> say that defines versions of all 5 or 6 methods that use both ntl
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:57 PM, William Stein wrote:
>> Do you have any idea how this would work? I mean, what would Sage
>> actually do? I don't mean "how would it be implemented in Sage", but
>> if you could program sage in natural l
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 4:17 AM, Martin Albrecht
wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> this is a continuation of a thread on [sage-nt] on arithmetic over Z/nZ[x] for
> n word sized.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-nt/browse_thread/thread/6e415c61089ea435
>
> It started about #4965
>
> http://trac.sa
On Jan 13, 4:35 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 at 03:30AM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
> > Hi Jason,
Hi Dan,
> > > I've almost exclusively been using my system mercurial, which I've
> > > kept updated. I don't think I've ever seen a problem with using
> > > that instead of the bundled
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 at 03:30AM -0800, mabshoff wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> > I've almost exclusively been using my system mercurial, which I've
> > kept updated. I don't think I've ever seen a problem with using
> > that instead of the bundled version of mercurial. I think that lots
> > of other deve
Hi there,
this is a continuation of a thread on [sage-nt] on arithmetic over Z/nZ[x] for
n word sized.
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-nt/browse_thread/thread/6e415c61089ea435
It started about #4965
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4965
as a call for help because I can't see
On Jan 13, 3:26 am, Jason Grout wrote:
Hi Jason,
> I've almost exclusively been using my system mercurial, which I've kept
> updated. I don't think I've ever seen a problem with using that instead
> of the bundled version of mercurial. I think that lots of other
> developers are also usin
Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the plan for upgrading the version of mercurial distributed
> with sage? 1.0.2 fixes a bug which readily crashed my sage-combinat
> patch repository twice (namely: don't qrename a new patch in your
> queue before committing it!)?
>
> As a temporary
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:16 PM, mabshoff wrote:
>
> Ok, since it is queues no one has complained so far. The upgrade
> should be trivial and it has been on my todo list, so please open a
> ticket and it will be in 3.3.
>
>
It's #4969 on trac. I've been using queues exclusively for almost a year
On Jan 13, 1:04 am, "Nicolas M. Thiery"
wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> What's the plan for upgrading the version of mercurial distributed
> with sage? 1.0.2 fixes a bug which readily crashed my sage-combinat
> patch repository twice (namely: don't qrename a new patch in your
> queue before commit
Hi,
What's the plan for upgrading the version of mercurial distributed
with sage? 1.0.2 fixes a bug which readily crashed my sage-combinat
patch repository twice (namely: don't qrename a new patch in your
queue before committing it!)?
As a temporary alternative, do you foresee any proble
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:57 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Do you have any idea how this would work? I mean, what would Sage
> actually do? I don't mean "how would it be implemented in Sage", but
> if you could program sage in natural language, how would you describe
> what you're asking for righ
38 matches
Mail list logo
