Robert Bradshaw wrote: > > > +1, that sounds like a very good idea. I'd imagine one could have a > fresh copy of sage, and just fork from there for every new doctest/ > notebook session. (It would probably be a lot simpler, and still > scale much better, for the notebook to start an unused sage process > in the background and then repeatedly forking that rather than trying > to fork the notebook process itself).
How does forking behave on Windows? Are we still making decisions based on portability to an eventual Windows port? Jason --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URLs: http://www.sagemath.org -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
