Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Sex, 2008-11-21 às 16:44 -0700, dean moore escreveu:
>> Haven't posted anything to this list in a long time. Posting to both
>> lists -- unsure of proper bin.
>>
>> Searched & googled, couldn't find this previously reported or solved
>> -- sorry if I'm spamming.
>>
>> Run
Em Sex, 2008-11-21 às 16:44 -0700, dean moore escreveu:
> Haven't posted anything to this list in a long time. Posting to both
> lists -- unsure of proper bin.
>
> Searched & googled, couldn't find this previously reported or solved
> -- sorry if I'm spamming.
>
> Running SAGE Version 3.1.2 on
Em Sex, 2008-11-21 às 16:38 -0800, mhampton escreveu:
>
> Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Hey, that's much more awesome! It lacks some antialiasing, though.
>
> That image was actually made with anti-aliasing turned on in tachyon,
> but there are some other funny things going on. In
William,
Thanks for the reply. Yes, I can see you've been busy with lots of
other things. ;-)
I've been working with Eitan Guari (tex4ht author) and I think he
understands the situation better now, since he isn't a SAGE user
(yet). He's been very responsive, so I think we can lean on tex4ht's
On Nov 21, 6:10 pm, Guillaume Moroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> I'm new to sage, and so far I like it!
>
:)
> Just my two cents here: it seems that the sage interface to singular
> is not aware that Singular handles multivariate polynomial rings with
> coefficients in a fraction f
Hi,
I'm new to sage, and so far I like it!
Just my two cents here: it seems that the sage interface to singular
is not aware that Singular handles multivariate polynomial rings with
coefficients in a fraction field.
sage: from sage.rings.polynomial.polynomial_singular_interface import
can_conve
Hi Sage Developers,
If you're a grad student and interested in quadratic forms, you should
apply to go to the
Arizona Winter School this March: http://math.arizona.edu/~swc/
I'm one of the organizers, and Jon Hanke (another Sage developer) will
be one of the
featured speakers. The other feature
Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hey, that's much more awesome! It lacks some antialiasing, though.
That image was actually made with anti-aliasing turned on in tachyon,
but there are some other funny things going on. In a sense it was a
mistake, I was trying to do something else and I
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:08 PM, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear William,
>
> On Nov 21, 5:00 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The license is very very open source according to the website:
>>
>>http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/license.htm
>>
>> I've made
Haven't posted anything to this list in a long time. Posting to both lists
-- unsure of proper bin.
Searched & googled, couldn't find this previously reported or solved --
sorry if I'm spamming.
Running SAGE Version 3.1.2 on Ubuntu Linux in notebook, though about same
happened
command line.
*Sc
Simon King wrote:
> Dear William,
>
> On Nov 21, 11:15 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:37 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I tried the spkg that I made just now on some macs, and it seems
>> to just work fine. It doesn't have jpg support buil
Dear William,
On Nov 21, 11:15 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:37 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried the spkg that I made just now on some macs, and it seems
> to just work fine. It doesn't have jpg support built in since Sage doesn't
> s
Dear William,
On Nov 21, 5:00 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The license is very very open source according to the website:
>
> http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/license.htm
>
> I've made an optional PIL spkg (it's small -- 384kb) and posted it here:
>
> http://sagema
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:37 PM, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would love to have PIL in sage, and for someone to fix the gd module
> that Tom Boothby worked on. I guess the advantage of gd is its
> speed. I think for both of them there are some issues on macs, with
> the jpeg librar
I would love to have PIL in sage, and for someone to fix the gd module
that Tom Boothby worked on. I guess the advantage of gd is its
speed. I think for both of them there are some issues on macs, with
the jpeg library, but maybe that's been fixed in PIL now. With gd I
remember I finally got it
On Nov 21, 12:42 pm, Octoploid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 7:51 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This seems to indicate that you upgraded from a binary build with a C+
> > + compiler using a different ABI. What did you upgrade from? Did you
> > upgrade the C++ compiler
On Nov 21, 7:51 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 21, 9:45 am, Octoploid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Nov 20, 10:44 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > For early adopters, sage-3.2 has been released. You can get the
> > > source from here:http:
On Nov 20, 2008, at 1:44 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For early adopters, sage-3.2 has been released. You can get the
> source from here: http://sagemath.org/src/
> Or you can do "sage -upgrade".
>
> Binaries and an official announcement should come within a day or two.
Mac OS X, 10.5.
On Nov 21, 11:54 am, Tim Lahey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just compiled and ran make test on Mac OS X 10.5.5
> on my MacBook 2.1GHz. All tests passed except,
> The following tests failed:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py
>
> One thing I noticed is that the director
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:00 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Jason Bandlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Ronan Paixão wrote:
>>> Hey, that's much more awesome! It lacks some antialiasing, t
I just compiled and ran make test on Mac OS X 10.5.5
on my MacBook 2.1GHz. All tests passed except,
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py
**
File "/Users/tjlahey/sage/devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py",
On Nov 21, 4:55 am, Gabriel Gellner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:22:10PM -0800, kcrisman wrote:
> > I'm sorry if this is described somewhere, but I couldn't figure out
> > where that would be located. A sample of "before" and "after"
> > docstrings would be very he
William, congratulations!
This is a very nice book that deserved to be in print for a long time.
It's been available online all this time, and it's very nice that you
negotiated for it to be back online in the future. I will be getting a
bound hard-copy anyway.
I've used the book for an undergr
On Nov 21, 9:45 am, Octoploid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 20, 10:44 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > For early adopters, sage-3.2 has been released. You can get the
> > source from here:http://sagemath.org/src/
> > Or you can do "sage -upgrade".
>
> I ran "
Ronan Paixão wrote:
>
>>
>> Depending on feedback in this thread, I think we should consider
>> possibly including PIL standard in Sage. One could quickly make
>> some interesting interacts using it...
>>
>> William
>
> +1
> I for one would like it incorporated with the Graphics class, if
>
On Nov 20, 10:44 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For early adopters, sage-3.2 has been released. You can get the
> source from here:http://sagemath.org/src/
> Or you can do "sage -upgrade".
I ran "sage -upgrade" on my system amd64, gcc 4.3.2.
This is what I get after
> >
> > Ronan Paixão wrote:
> >> Hey, that's much more awesome! It lacks some antialiasing, though.
> >>
> >> Maybe we should add image manipulation support like those new
> >> Mathematica features:
> >> http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/newin7/content/BuiltInImageProcessing/
> >>
> >>
On Nov 14, 11:41 pm, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Jason Grout
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I just received this in an email from Wolfram:
>
> > Dear Mathematica User,
>
> > Soon we will release Mathematica 7! As a Premier Service
>
> Yeah!
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:20 AM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:53 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I wrote an undergraduate number theory book with lots of Sage code in
>> it, and it was officially
>> published by Springer-Verlag y
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Jason Bandlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ronan Paixão wrote:
>> Hey, that's much more awesome! It lacks some antialiasing, though.
>>
>> Maybe we should add image manipulation support like those new
>> Mathema
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Hey, that's much more awesome! It lacks some antialiasing, though.
>
> Maybe we should add image manipulation support like those new
> Mathematica features:
> http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/newin7/content/BuiltInImag
Hey, that's much more awesome! It lacks some antialiasing, though.
Maybe we should add image manipulation support like those new
Mathematica features:
http://www.wolfram.com/products/mathematica/newin7/content/BuiltInImageProcessing/
It sure would be nice to have PIL
http://www.pythonware.com/pr
Hi David,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 5:05 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this an implicit request to help with the sphinxification of tut.tex,
> inst.tex, prog.tex, const.tex? If so, I'd need further guidance.
Those are already done. He was just saying that when we convert all
o
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 4:56 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> now that 3.2 is out I have started building the 3.2.1.alpha0 merge
> tree. There are copious amounts of patches sitting in trac and we
> really ought to get as many merged of them in 3.2.1 as humanly
> possib
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:22:10PM -0800, kcrisman wrote:
>
> > possible since in 3.3 we will convert the docstrings to ReST. This
> > will likely break most patches not merged into 3.2.1.
>
> > around here is telling you what to do, but since the ReST transition
> > will be painful otherwise pl
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 9:53 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wrote an undergraduate number theory book with lots of Sage code in
> it, and it was officially
> published by Springer-Verlag yesterday.
>
> http://wstein.org/ent/
>
> http://www.springer.com/math/numbers/book
Just to throw a number around: There are *157* tickets with patches
and that is an all time high.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
37 matches
Mail list logo
