Hi folks,
Browsing through the directory
sage-3.1.4/devel/doc-main/overviews/numerical_sage
I notice that Josh Kantor has written a document on numerical computing
using Sage. Still excited about Harald Schilly's Documentation Quality
Initiative (DQI), I'd like to update and polish Josh's notes
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:17 PM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the above document on numerical computing is covered by CC 3.0 or a
> compatible license, then I'd be glad to work on it for the DQI. However,
> would future source releases of Sage continue to ship that document
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Bill Page wrote:
>> ...
>> It seems to me that of all the existing computer algebra systems,
>> because of it's strong and often pedantic type system, Axiom
>> seems most compatible with taking category theor
Hi Bill,
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The current design should leave the door open for those who will
>> want to do category theory (i.e. calculations on the categories
>> themselves), rather than using them to organize generic code which
>> is my own
Warning: This email consists mostly of a "rant" on category theory,
computer algebra, and a comparison of implementations that is somewhat
tangential to the main subject.
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Bill Page wrote:
>> >> The Sage concept of 'parent' is an attempt to capture similar
>> >>
On Nov 9, 2008, at 7:31 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
> Dear Sage developers,
>
>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Bill Page
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Sage concept of 'parent' is an attempt to capture similar
generic
relationships that are represented by categorie
> sage: C = VectorSpaces(GF(5))
> sage: C
> Category of vector spaces over Finite Field of size 5
> sage: W = (ZZ^3).span([[1,2,3],[4,5,3]])
> sage: W
>
> Free module of degree 3 and rank 2 over Integer Ring
> Echelon basis matrix:
> [1 2 3]
> [0 3 9]
> sage: C(W)
>
> Vector space of degree 3 and
On Nov 9, 2008, at 3:32 PM, William Stein wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:07 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 2:04 PM, Justin C. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Nov 9, 2008, at 13:27 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
Hell
I uploaded it. You can find it now at
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~mderickx/Install_Sage.zip.
Kind Regards
On Nov 10, 1:27 am, koffie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So, after getting us all exited could you describe what you did?
>
> To describe it a bit more precise, it is just a small work
Em Seg, 2008-11-10 às 01:14 -0200, Pablo De Napoli escreveu:
> Hi,
>
> I've tried to watch at the videos on Linux using vlc, xine and mplayer but I
> failed.
At least the first video I downloaded (the second one) I was able to
play in mplayer, xine, vlc and totem (though with some speed issues
> > I've tried to watch at the videos on Linux using vlc, xine and
> > mplayer but I
> > failed.
Here are the error messages when running
vlc craig_citro.mov
on Ubuntu 8.04 (Hardy):
VLC media player 0.8.6e Janus
[0304] mp4 demuxer error: MP4 plugin discarded (no moov box)
[0283] mai
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I would propose that *single variable* expressions behave like
> callables in one variable, there is no ambiguity as to the ordering,
> so one should be able to call, integrate, differentiate, plot, etc.
> with them without having to specify the variabl
12 matches
Mail list logo
