In the spirit of "release early" I've added my (incomplete) notes on
graph theory commands to the Documentation Project wiki. These are
designed for a first-time student of the subject and are being
developed as I teach such a course this semester. So they should see
frequent updates for the nex
On 5-Nov-08, at 8:55 PM, Robert Dodier wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>
>> Would you consider this weird if you read it in a paper, or
>> would you know how to interpret it?
>>
>> "Let $f = x^3 + x + 1$ and consider $f(10)$."
>
> I'm not so sure I know what to do with that.
I find this bizarr
William Stein wrote:
> Would you consider this weird if you read it in a paper, or
> would you know how to interpret it?
>
> "Let $f = x^3 + x + 1$ and consider $f(10)$."
I'm not so sure I know what to do with that.
I'm pretty sure I want (x^3 + x + 1)(10) to be (x^3)(10) +
x(10) + 1(10). (If
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:28 AM, David Joyner wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> On Nov 5, 9:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?\
>>
>> -1 - the will only cause more li
On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 13:23 -0400, David Joyner escreveu:
>> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?
>> As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
>> countries, it also isn't a license technically
To quote U.S. copyright law, section 107:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use
of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or
phonorecords, or by any other means specified by that section, for
purposes such as criticism, comment, ne
While we are discussing licenses, I thought I would point out that the
Sage wiki very prominently says "By making an explicit contribution to
the Sage wiki (or the Sage documentation), one certifies that one's
contribution is licensed under the Creative Commons 3.0 license."
(I don't know about im
Hello folks,
here goes 3.2.alpha3 - somewhat later than planned. Hopefully we
fixed all numerical doctest noise from #788 (I even reverted a small
number of changes) and otherwise merged a couple other nice patches.
If this release builds and doctests fine it will likely become
3.2.final in the
On Nov 5, 10:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am personally happy with the GFDL 1.3, but some might find it
> a bit of overkill.
FWIW for Maxima I have pressed for new documents to be
licensed under GPL. Having the same license for documents
and code means stuff can be freely
Hi Sage Days 11 Participants (cc: sage-devel),
I have created a google group for Sage Days 11 here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-days11/. (I've had invite messages
sent to all of you, but it could be until Friday before they are sent,
because of Google's anti-spam system.)
I created a cod
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:43 AM, David Joyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I went through 5 passes, and sage -testall kept locking up at various
> places, so I rebuilt
> Sage. I also tested to see if the tarball was coorupted but it seems
> the download went okay.
>
> After the rebuild, the same
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 13:23 -0400, David Joyner escreveu:
> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?
> As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
> countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
Just now I noticed on the CC page that in B
Robert Miller wrote:
> Jason,
>
>> Does anyone know if it is assumed that if the _pos dictionary in a graph
>> is not None, then it contains each vertex as a key? It seems like it is
>> assumed several places in the code (e.g., in the subgraph() function).
>> However, _pos isn't updated properly
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Nov 5, 9:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?\
>
> -1 - the will only cause more license proliferation.
>
>> As was pointed out, "public
On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:23 AM, David Joyner wrote:
> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?
> As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
> countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
Much of the headache in choosing a license is that t
On Nov 5, 9:23 am, "David Joyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?\
-1 - the will only cause more license proliferation.
> As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
> countries, it also isn't a license techn
Should we consider creating our own "Sage documentation license"?
As was pointed out, "public domain" not only doesn't exist in some
countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
I am personally happy with the GFDL 1.3, but some might find it
a bit of overkill.
Comments? Unless people
Robert Miller wrote:
> Jason,
>
>> Does anyone know if it is assumed that if the _pos dictionary in a graph
>> is not None, then it contains each vertex as a key? It seems like it is
>> assumed several places in the code (e.g., in the subgraph() function).
>> However, _pos isn't updated properly
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Harald Schilly
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Nov 5, 3:45 pm, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
>> crypto:
>>
>> http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
>
> wo
On Nov 5, 3:45 pm, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
> crypto:
>
> http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
wow, looks really good and is nearly exactly what i originally
expected.
It's now linked
Jason,
> Does anyone know if it is assumed that if the _pos dictionary in a graph
> is not None, then it contains each vertex as a key? It seems like it is
> assumed several places in the code (e.g., in the subgraph() function).
> However, _pos isn't updated properly (e.g., in the delete_vertex
Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
> crypto:
>
> http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
>
> This version incorporates suggestions from John, Martin and William, and
> they are duly acknowledged in th
Hi folks,
Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
crypto:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
This version incorporates suggestions from John, Martin and William, and
they are duly acknowledged in the document itself. Please remind me i
Martin Albrecht wrote:
>
> I suppose my preferred copyright statement is something like this: "I don't
> care what you do with these slides and I happily provide TeX sources. You
> might violate someone's copyright though, but that is your problem." Don't
> get me wrong: You are of course righ
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> >> Martin Albrecht wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> > On Tue, No
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Martin Albrecht wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:03 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > Hi Hara
I have now placed MAF on my website. You can find it at
www.alunw.freeuk.com/MAF/download.html
As yet there is no licence of any kind with any of the downloads,
though the download page does state my intention to publish the
program under the terms of the GPL.
I shall try to update the download
Hi,
sorry for taking this off-list earlier.
> > 1) "Modern cryptography uses many fundamental concepts from number
> > theory"
> >
> > I think the precise statement would be that public key cryptography uses
> > many fundamental concepts from number theory. Most of symmetric
> > cryptography is
2008/11/5 Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Martin Albrecht wrote:
>>> http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto.pdf
>>>
>>> This is a short tutorial on using Sage to study elementary number
>>> theory and the RSA public key cryptosystem. By "short", I mean at most
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> Martin Albrecht wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> >> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> >>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão
> >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > wrote:
> Ther
31 matches
Mail list logo
