While we are discussing licenses, I thought I would point out that the Sage wiki very prominently says "By making an explicit contribution to the Sage wiki (or the Sage documentation), one certifies that one's contribution is licensed under the Creative Commons 3.0 license."
(I don't know about implicit contributions. :) The link goes to the attribution-sharealike unported license [1]. Before we start getting into gritty details of CC and GFDL and GPL and so on, we should note that the wiki already claims to "auto-licenses" everything fed into it. Perhaps that line on the front page of the wiki should say something like "Unless specified otherwise..."? Dan 1. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ -- --- Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ----- KAIST Department of Mathematical Sciences ------- http://mathsci.kaist.ac.kr/~drake
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
