On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 4) Generating public and private keys
>>
>> Choosing p and q of such different sizes is really a bad idea and IMHO
>> shouldn't be encouraged. The hardness of factorisation depends on the size
>> (and form) of the smaller
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to reply to myself, but I also believe that Fernando is subscribed
> to this list, so he might see your comments here as well.
Yes, I am, and I'll be happy to update the doc before sending it to
python-dev with any fe
Hi Martin,
Martin Albrecht wrote:
>> http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto.pdf
>>
>> This is a short tutorial on using Sage to study elementary number
>> theory and the RSA public key cryptosystem. By "short", I mean at most
>> 10 pages. If anyone has write privileges on the ww
Thanks, Minh, for the offer to take in my group theory notes. I'll be
back in touch once I have something to "dump" your way. ;-)
Rob
On Nov 4, 7:11 pm, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A good way to do it is to "dump" your abstract algebra notes on a novice
> like me :-) I'd be more
Does anyone know if it is assumed that if the _pos dictionary in a graph
is not None, then it contains each vertex as a key? It seems like it is
assumed several places in the code (e.g., in the subgraph() function).
However, _pos isn't updated properly (e.g., in the delete_vertex
function, th
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
>> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
>>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
>>>
Hi Rob,
Rob Beezer wrote:
> As I have been teaching abstract algebra this semester, I have been
> keeping notes on how to use Sage for this, and distributing them to my
> students. So they follow the outline of a typical undergraduate
> course on group theory, trying to use only the ideas they h
As I have been teaching abstract algebra this semester, I have been
keeping notes on how to use Sage for this, and distributing them to my
students. So they follow the outline of a typical undergraduate
course on group theory, trying to use only the ideas they have been
taught previously in the c
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
> > > how to get files there (
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> > There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
>> >
Jason Grout wrote:
> Ronan Paixão wrote:
>> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu:
>>> On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates
>>> for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address
>>> matrix multiplication versus element-wise m
Agreed!
I am still hoping to replace the document const.tex by
cookbook.tex. I'm happy to assemble the chapters but
even happier if someone else does:-)
I'm not sure what the correct procedure is, so I put a
chapter up on trac http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3624
Maybe a wiki page is b
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
> > how to get files there (who to send to). I noticed there have been quite
> > som
Ronan Paixão wrote:
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu:
>> On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates
>> for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address
>> matrix multiplication versus element-wise multiplication. Fernando
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi Harald,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
>> > <[EMAI
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Harald,
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the qual
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> William Stein wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
>> had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
>> and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
>> and o
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:56 -0600, Jason Grout escreveu:
> On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates
> for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address
> matrix multiplication versus element-wise multiplication. Fernando
> Perez has put together
William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
> had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
> and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
> and on the website.
Is that a challenge? :-)
On a serious note, I'm planning to d
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
> how to get files there (who to send to). I noticed there have been quite
> some talks around since I started watching this list.
It would likely b
Hi,
I skimmed the crypto tutorial and liked it. I really wish we
had a bunch of domain-specific tutorials gathered together
and included in a single book or directory with Sage,
and on the website. I wrote one recently for algebraic
number fields. These tutorials would mostly -- like yours
an
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 6:07 PM, Harald Schilly
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I want to propose a process to increase the quality of the Sage
>> documentation. This is the by far most annoying thing
Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
>
>> Mma returns the term as "0. t^3"
>>
>
> That's interesting. Which version of Magma?
I meant mathematica; version 6.0.1 on Linux.
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsub
On the numpy list, there has been discussion on PEP225, which advocates
for more custom inline operators in python, particularly to address
matrix multiplication versus element-wise multiplication. Fernando
Perez has put together a summary and is sending this to python-dev in a
few days. See
Doh! Mma = mathematica. I need to learn how to read!!
Thanks for checking that.
Bill.
On 5 Nov, 00:45, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5 Nov, 00:26, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > > On 4 Nov, 03:39, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
On 5 Nov, 00:26, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Hart wrote:
>
> > On 4 Nov, 03:39, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Bill Hart wrote:
> >>> sage: R.=RDF['t']
> >>> sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
> >>> sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
> >>> s
Bill Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 4 Nov, 03:39, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Bill Hart wrote:
>>> sage: R.=RDF['t']
>>> sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
>>> sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
>>> sage: s*u
>>> 100.0*t^6 - 100.0*t^5 + 100.0*t^4 - 100.0*t^2 + 100.0*t
No I concocted the example as a result of a conversation with someone
about a related computation comparing speed of algorithms in RDF['x'].
Interestingly Pari returns 0.e-36*t^3 for the middle term. This means
that if further computations are done involving that term, the answer
will always yiel
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 at 07:09AM -0800, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Yes, I looked closely at SageTex a couple of
> months ago. Its a great idea, but I think it maybe does the reverse
> of what I want. I'd like to have Sage input/commands appear in a
> worksheet, surrounded by text fro
On 4 Nov, 03:39, Jason Grout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bill Hart wrote:
> > sage: R.=RDF['t']
> > sage: s=1.0e1*t^3+1.0e-100*t^2+1.01234e-100*t+1.0e1
> > sage: u=1.0e1*t^3-1.0e1*t^2+1.0e1*t-1.0e1
> > sage: s*u
> > 100.0*t^6 - 100.0*t^5 + 100.0*t^4 - 100.0*t^2 + 100.0*t - 100.0
>
> > What happ
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Right, I typed it incorrectly. But if I type R. = RDF['t'] the
> result is the same.
> Bill.
Yes, that's true. I just jumped on that one problem, since it
initially prevented
me from executing the rest of the code. Then wh
Right, I typed it incorrectly. But if I type R. = RDF['t'] the
result is the same.
Bill.
On 4 Nov, 03:43, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Bill Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > sage: R.=RDF['t']
>
> This first line is wrong. It should be
>
> R
Note: You have log in first at sagenb.org before that link will work.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:25 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Are there safeguards in place to prevent a student from changing the
>>
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:38 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are there safeguards in place to prevent a student from changing the
> contents of the book?
Yes.
> Also, if the notebook itself is not user-changeable, at least
> temporarily, it would defeat the most of the purpose of
The book is open-source with a GFDL license, so no, there are no
safeguards. In fact, changes are encouraged. ;-)
Seriously though, I'm thinking each student would have a local copy,
rather than a shared copy on a server. They could experiment with
Sage within this copy, and perhaps annotate i
There are no talks from 2008. Somewhere there should be instructions on
how to get files there (who to send to). I noticed there have been quite
some talks around since I started watching this list.
Ronan
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 11:19 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:14 A
Are there safeguards in place to prevent a student from changing the
contents of the book?
Also, if the notebook itself is not user-changeable, at least
temporarily, it would defeat the most of the purpose of making it the
book inside a notebook.
I'm not familiar enough with the notebook's authe
Wow, the last talks in there are from 2007!
Here are mine, feel free to add them:
OKCon:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb/talks/20080315%20-%20Sage%20-%20OKCon%20-%20London.pdf
Trophees du libre:
http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb/talks/20071129%20-%20Sage%20-%20Soissons.pdf
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Ronan Paixão <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would it be possible to create a repository of talks about sage?
>
> Ronan Paixão
It would be good to add to this:
http://sagemath.org/talks/
William
>
> Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 01:08 -0800, Craig Citro escreveu:
>> Hey
Would it be possible to create a repository of talks about sage?
Ronan Paixão
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 01:08 -0800, Craig Citro escreveu:
> Hey Martin -- this looks great! In fact, I'm giving an Intro to Sage
> talk at SD11 on Friday ... I'm tempted to just reuse your slides! :P
>
> -cc
>
> On Mo
Harald Schilly wrote:
> Hello, in my last post about sagetex and more exposure of sage pages,
> i had the idea to create a random link (not really random, there is
> nothing like that in apache ssi, but the seconds of the timestamp are
> more than ok)
> therefore, there are now 10 links that are v
Hello, in my last post about sagetex and more exposure of sage pages,
i had the idea to create a random link (not really random, there is
nothing like that in apache ssi, but the seconds of the timestamp are
more than ok)
therefore, there are now 10 links that are very prominent on the
index.html
Dan,
Thanks for the reply. Yes, I looked closely at SageTex a couple of
months ago. Its a great idea, but I think it maybe does the reverse
of what I want. I'd like to have Sage input/commands appear in a
worksheet, surrounded by text from the book. Then a student could
read the text, execute
On Nov 4, 2:04 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think SageTeX deserves to have a more prominent place on the webpage
It's on http://sagemath.org/tour-research.html (not new, there since
months) but it could be more visible -- although as always, making
more things visible makes everyth
Hi,
I have made all known numerical noise issues with 3.2.a2 tickets - see
#4436-4439. If someone has some additional failures please add them to
the tickets. If you have a failure in another file please open a new
ticket against 3.2.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---
I think SageTeX deserves to have a more prominent place on the webpage
and wiki - maybe I'm missing it but I don't see any links to it.
When you (Dan) were first working on it, I tried to use it and failed
but I just tried again (on a mac) and almost everything works for me,
not using the imagema
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
> Does your permission to use your slides extend to others?
Definitely! I even wrote a README.txt:
"""
Feel free to re-use these slides for whatever purpose.
"""
Cheers,
Martin
--
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup
Martin Albrecht wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
>>> Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
>>> history/background for SD11 though.
>> Oh, I was mostly kidding -- but actually, please upload the sources!
>> Your beamer slides are WAY prettier than
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
> > Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
> > history/background for SD11 though.
>
> Oh, I was mostly kidding -- but actually, please upload the sources!
> Your beamer slides are WAY prettier than the ones I create. Amusi
On Nov 3, 11:43 pm, "Georg S. Weber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 4 Nov., 01:57, "Justin C. Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 31, 2008, at 5:13 PM, mabshoff wrote:
> > sage -t devel/sage/sage/calculus/calculus.py
> > this has been reported, but I just noticed that
> Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
> history/background for SD11 though.
>
Oh, I was mostly kidding -- but actually, please upload the sources!
Your beamer slides are WAY prettier than the ones I create. Amusingly,
I stole the template I currently use from your ta
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, Craig Citro wrote:
> Hey Martin -- this looks great! In fact, I'm giving an Intro to Sage
> talk at SD11 on Friday ... I'm tempted to just reuse your slides! :P
Go for it! I can upload my sources to sage.math. I would add some
history/background for SD11 though.
Mar
On Tuesday 04 November 2008, David Joyner wrote:
> I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition too.
> Very good.
>
> Someone was just asking me a question related to the program
> you used to create the graph of on page 26. Is this a graph of
> Sage classes? What is the p
Hey Martin -- this looks great! In fact, I'm giving an Intro to Sage
talk at SD11 on Friday ... I'm tempted to just reuse your slides! :P
-cc
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Martin Albrecht
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I'll give a talk on Sage this Thursday to the PhD student sem
On Sun, 02 Nov 2008 at 09:15PM -0800, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Long-term I would like to add "live" Sage code to my LaTeX sources and
> have them migrate to the worksheets as cells, demonstrating the use of
> Sage for the relevant aspects of linear algebra. The end result would
> be a "Sage-enhanced" v
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 at 02:58AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
>> I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition
>> too. Very good.
>
> I was totally not expecting 4chan to appear in a Sage talk...
>
>> Also,
On Tue, 04 Nov 2008 at 02:58AM -0500, David Joyner wrote:
> I think it's excellent. I laughed at the intro to the Sage definition
> too. Very good.
I was totally not expecting 4chan to appear in a Sage talk...
> Also, what font are you using? I like it. Maybe Arial or Veranda?
Looks like a stand
57 matches
Mail list logo
