mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> this is alpha4 and more progress toward the final 3.1.2. As some
> people have noticed this release is getting larger than the original
> 3.1, but I guess such is life. THe m4ri issues have been sorted out,
> but there are still four major issues:
>
> * ghmm/h
Live syntax highlighting for the notebook would be awesome. I'm sure
it would be hard to implement, but have a look at this demonstration
of codemirror:
http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/codemirror/jstest.html
which does live syntax highlighting for javascript in the browser.
The details are pretty ni
On a mac intel (10.5) I had:
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/lisp.py
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/sage0.py
...which look like they are all known issues.
-M. Hampton
On Sep 2, 7:05 pm, "Dav
On Sep 2, 10:40 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks very much for this response. ffmpeg looks very useful to me, I
> am checking it out right now. It is unclear to me what the overlap is
> with mplayer/mencoder. It seems that ffmpeg is somewhat leaner and
> more portable, so I am t
On Sep 2, 9:20 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Build reports
Hi John,
> 32-bit: just the already known failures:
>
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/hmm.pyx
> sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py
>
>
On Sep 2, 6:43 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi John,
> I hope I didn't kill #1115's chances by relabelling it from a bug fix
> to an enhancement, since I didn't just fix the bug...
Nope, code from that area is high level and usually does introduce no
failures that are platform
installed fine and all tests passed on amd64 hardy heron.
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 9:06 AM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
>
> this is alpha4 and more progress toward the final 3.1.2. As some
> people have noticed this release is getting larger than the original
> 3.1, but I
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, mabshoff wrote:
>
> On Sep 2, 8:52 am, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Karl-Dieter,
>
>> We are running a VMWare server for fall classes. However, we have run
>> into the disturbing problem that if we want to use a newer version of
>> Sage (such as to get the plotti
I changed the name to: "Implementing number fields defined by
non-monic polynomials" and have this comment:
It's not clear to me exactly what Nick means: defining polys in Z[x]
with leading coefficient -1, or something more general over Q, or also
relative number fields.
2008/9/2 mabshoff <[EMA
Hi,
as a solution around the problem: Why don't you shut down the VMWare
image, make a copy, start the VMWare image again, run an in place
upgrade and then restart the notebook again? That way you have a
backup of the old VMWare version with the worksheets and after the
upgrade a hopefully fully
On Sep 2, 8:52 am, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Karl-Dieter,
> We are running a VMWare server for fall classes. However, we have run
> into the disturbing problem that if we want to use a newer version of
> Sage (such as to get the plotting improvements), we would need to
> (quoting W
On Sep 2, 12:46 pm, Nick Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Implementing non-monic number fields would be hard, but not if the
> leading coefficient is a unit :) Could a ticket be opened, mabshoff?
>
> Nick
Hi Nick,
this is now #4041, but someone might want to come up with a better
desc
Implementing non-monic number fields would be hard, but not if the
leading coefficient is a unit :) Could a ticket be opened, mabshoff?
Nick
{{{
sage: NumberField(x^2 - 2, 'a')
Number Field in a with defining polynomial x^2 - 2
sage: NumberField(-x^2 - 2, 'a')
Build reports
32-bit: just the already known failures:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/chmm.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/stats/hmm/hmm.pyx
sage -t devel/sage/sage/interfaces/gp.py
on Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version
4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3
We are running a VMWare server for fall classes. However, we have run
into the disturbing problem that if we want to use a newer version of
Sage (such as to get the plotting improvements), we would need to
(quoting William in the earlier version of this thread) "upload them
tediously one by one."
There is a Notebook blocker at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3960
A critical one at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3918
Two major ones that are pretty serious to me:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3957 and
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3711
On Tue, Se
I hope I didn't kill #1115's chances by relabelling it from a bug fix
to an enhancement, since I didn't just fix the bug...
The only problem with the current patch is that we found a call to
dumps() crashes on a 64-bit machine but is fine on a 32-bit machine.
Anyone have any idea what might cause
Hello folks,
the end of the 3.1.2 release cycle is near - at least the point where
we will only merge bug fixes or even critical bug fixes. So if you
have things sitting in trac waiting to make it in please find somebody
to review the patch. Please also make sure that the positively
reviewed patc
Hello folks,
this is alpha4 and more progress toward the final 3.1.2. As some
people have noticed this release is getting larger than the original
3.1, but I guess such is life. THe m4ri issues have been sorted out,
but there are still four major issues:
* ghmm/hmm
* gp.py doctest failing on 3
The Sage banner was created by Alex Clemesha, http://alex.knoboo.com/, and
is open source because this topic has come up already on sage-devel
(long ago). As far as I know all Sage art is open source. AFAIK, the only
graphical thing related to Sage which is *not* open source are the page
designs w
Dear Harald,
On Sep 2, 12:12 pm, Harald Schilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, yes, for me no problem and I don't think for anyone else: as long
> as it is for "promoting" sage you can do what you want.
Certainly it is promotion. After all, one aim of my pages is to
present my computational re
On Sep 2, 11:22 am, Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am i allowed to use the picture on top of http://www.sagemath.org/for
> that purpose?
Hi, yes, for me no problem and I don't think for anyone else: as long
as it is for "promoting" sage you can do what you want. On the other
hand, ther
Dear team,
on my web pages, i'd like to put a couple of links to the Sage pages.
Of course i could use the text "Sage" for being klicked at, but i
think a picture would be nicer.
Am i allowed to use the picture on top of http://www.sagemath.org/ for
that purpose?
And am i allowed to change the
23 matches
Mail list logo
