[sage-devel] Re: does zn_poly normally take a long time to build?

2008-07-16 Thread tkeller
Sage 3.0.3 definitely built from source for me 3ish weeks ago. I've applied suggested Debian/Ubuntu updates since then (nothing too radical sticks out) , but I'll trying rebuilding 3.0.3 tomorrow morning. Thanks much for your responses. Regards, Thomas On Jul 16, 10:59 pm, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROT

[sage-devel] Re: Parent and Element support for non numeric data

2008-07-16 Thread Arnaud Bergeron
2008/7/16 Mike Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi Arnaud, > >>On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Arnaud Bergeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation >> of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already >> there). You ca

[sage-devel] Re: does zn_poly normally take a long time to build?

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 16, 8:54 pm, tkeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Thomas, > I may have been imprecise. To clarify, zn_poly built, then displayed > this message: > Calibrating cycle counter... ok (3.84e+18) > KS mul: ... > KS sqr: ... > Nussbaumer m

[sage-devel] Re: does zn_poly normally take a long time to build?

2008-07-16 Thread tkeller
I may have been imprecise. To clarify, zn_poly built, then displayed this message: Calibrating cycle counter... ok (3.84e+18) KS mul: ... KS sqr: ... Nussbaumer mul: ... Nussbaumer sqr:

[sage-devel] Sage 3.0.6.alpha0 released

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
Hello folks, this is 3.0.6.alpha0. This release is a mix of bug fixes and new features. Nothing crazy has been merged so far and it is unclear at the moment how things will develop until ISSAC. I have a bunch of Solaris build fixes sitting on my box that have not been merged due to lack of time (

[sage-devel] Re: does zn_poly normally take a long time to build?

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 16, 8:39 pm, tkeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > The last build I built from source (3.0.3) took ~ 3 hours total on my > average dell laptop  (running kubuntu 8.0.4.1).  Building 3.0.5 is > ongoing, but has spent the last 5+ hours on "zn_poly tuning program." > Is this normal?  It ha

[sage-devel] does zn_poly normally take a long time to build?

2008-07-16 Thread tkeller
The last build I built from source (3.0.3) took ~ 3 hours total on my average dell laptop (running kubuntu 8.0.4.1). Building 3.0.5 is ongoing, but has spent the last 5+ hours on "zn_poly tuning program." Is this normal? It hasn't stalled, but has effectively tripled the compilation time (at le

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.5/3.0.6.alpha0: doctest failure in ssmod.py

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 16, 6:49 pm, "Andrzej Giniewicz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Hi, > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Craig Citro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is bad, in the sense that it's wrong. What machine was this > > happening on? > > in my case it's AMD Athlon from "Barton age", ther

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.5/3.0.6.alpha0: doctest failure in ssmod.py

2008-07-16 Thread Andrzej Giniewicz
Hi, On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Craig Citro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is bad, in the sense that it's wrong. What machine was this > happening on? in my case it's AMD Athlon from "Barton age", there's cpuinfo: processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 6

[sage-devel] Re: Sage 3.0.5/3.0.6.alpha0: doctest failure in ssmod.py

2008-07-16 Thread Craig Citro
This is bad, in the sense that it's wrong. What machine was this happening on? Did you try running this same test 100 or so times with 3.0.3 (before the new FLINT)? It might be worth upgrading FLINT anyway -- someone else could be hitting the same corner case, maybe in a non-doctest fashion ...

[sage-devel] Sage 3.0.5/3.0.6.alpha0: doctest failure in ssmod.py

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
Hi, I hit the following doctest failure in Sage 3.0.5/3.0.6.alpha0: sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/modular/ssmod/ssmod.py ** File "/scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle/sage-3.0.6.alpha0/tmp/ssmod.py", line 14: sage: D[:3] Expected

[sage-devel] Re: Parent and Element support for non numeric data

2008-07-16 Thread Mike Hansen
Hi Arnaud, >On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:13 PM, Arnaud Bergeron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation > of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already > there). You can find our current code at > http://sage-words.goog

[sage-devel] Re: Parent and Element support for non numeric data

2008-07-16 Thread Robert Bradshaw
On Jul 16, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Arnaud Bergeron wrote: > I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation > of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already > there). You can find our current code at > http://sage-words.googlecode.com/ if you are interested. >

[sage-devel] Parent and Element support for non numeric data

2008-07-16 Thread Arnaud Bergeron
I am currently working on a module for combinatorics and manipulation of words in sage (which is much more powerful than what is already there). You can find our current code at http://sage-words.googlecode.com/ if you are interested. We started out using as little as possible from the Sage libra

[sage-devel] Re: Wrapping C++ Classes in Cython

2008-07-16 Thread Chris Swierczewski
Joel, > Do you have control of the CFLAGS that are passed to the compiler (presumably > gcc) which compiles the cython generated code?  If so, you can use the -D > switch to define the __LINUX identifier. Yes. Just to clarify, I've been able to compile by setting this flag and simply typing ope

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 16, 1:33 am, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 15 Jul, 23:48, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > According to ls -l, the file is 139557984 bytes long. Here's the > > > checksum: Hi David, > > > $  dig

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4/5

2008-07-16 Thread Michael Abshoff
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:40 AM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5? I'm > > wondering whether to bother building the latter having just do

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4/5

2008-07-16 Thread John Cremona
Thanks! I hope you enjoy your European trip, though it's a pity that our paths will not cross this time. John 2008/7/16 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 a

[sage-devel] Re: 3.0.4/5

2008-07-16 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:38 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5? I'm > wondering whether to bother building the latter having just done the > former. A few tiny fixes for certain obscure architectures were added and so

[sage-devel] 3.0.4/5

2008-07-16 Thread John Cremona
What happened in the nanosecond between releases 3.0.4 and 3.0.5? I'm wondering whether to bother building the latter having just done the former. John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this

[sage-devel] Sage is worth $ 6,499,888

2008-07-16 Thread Harald Schilly
Recently I came across SLOCCount [1]. It claims to count source code lines "correctly" (heuristics, comments, detects duplicate files,...) and estimates the cost to develop it. It seems to don't know cython, but I still want to share this ;-) Maybe someone wants to play with it and tweak it to wor

[sage-devel] Re: sagenb.org and the other public notebooks are down

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 16, 12:24 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > just to let you know: For some reason all the public Sage notebooks on > > sage.math are down. Since William is off the grid and I have no > > documentation

[sage-devel] Re: optional packages without root access?

2008-07-16 Thread mabshoff
On Jul 16, 1:37 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Ursula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I am using the copy of Sage installed on sage.math.washington.edu from > > the command line.  I do not have root access. > > > I would like to use some comman

[sage-devel] Re: Wrapping C++ Classes in Cython

2008-07-16 Thread Joel B. Mohler
On Tuesday 15 July 2008 06:57:57 pm Chris Swierczewski wrote: > My Question (Finally): How do I go about wrapping this C++ class with > this strange little define hanging around the class declaration? > Methinks I'm having compile issues precisely because of this addition. > I checked the Cython w

[sage-devel] Re: optional packages without root access?

2008-07-16 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Ursula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am using the copy of Sage installed on sage.math.washington.edu from > the command line. I do not have root access. > > I would like to use some commands which require the optional package > gap_packages-4.4.10_4 . Because

[sage-devel] Re: Sage-3.0.5 Solaris-x86-sse3 binary

2008-07-16 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
On 15 Jul, 23:48, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 15, 3:18 pm, "Dr. David Kirkby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > According to ls -l, the file is 139557984 bytes long. Here's the > > checksum: > > > $ digest -v -a md5 sage-3.0.5-sse3-i86pc--SunOS_BETA.tar.gz > > > md5 (sage-3.0.5-sse3-i86

[sage-devel] Re: Bug in ComplexIntervalField

2008-07-16 Thread saucerful
I like 3. It probably makes the most sense because its the behavior is simplest to define/remember, and (in)equality is by far the most important anyway. On Jul 16, 2:44 am, Carl Witty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jul 13, 1:57 pm, saucerful <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I see.  Yes I agree

[sage-devel] Re: call for success stories

2008-07-16 Thread Simon King
Dear Harald, On Jul 15, 12:15 pm, "Harald Schilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am searching for interesting content and this time I want to ask > everyone who has used Sage for his or her research or in education in > class to write a short success story. It should talk about how it was > used

[sage-devel] Re: sagenb.org and the other public notebooks are down

2008-07-16 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:14 PM, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > just to let you know: For some reason all the public Sage notebooks on > sage.math are down. Since William is off the grid and I have no > documentation how to properly restart the notebooks they will be down > until William sh